❗ #ReleaseTheOriginalTrilogy | OriginalTrilogy.com’s enduring goal | How you can help ❗ — Page 3

EDIT: Please disregard. When I posted this, I was operating on limited/flawed information based on a lower quality video. My concerns were answered in the other post about the 2027 re-release.

𝐻𝑒𝑦, 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑟. 𝐼 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝐼 𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡. 𝐼 𝑠𝑎𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 “𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒” 𝑜𝑛 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠. 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑒’𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒:

[[𝑁𝑂𝑇𝐸: 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝐼’𝑚 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟, 𝐼 𝑐𝑎𝑛’𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑏𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑠 𝑦𝑒𝑡, 𝑠𝑜 𝐼 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 . 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑠. 𝐼 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑖𝑡’𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑛, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑓 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑔𝑜 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑠, 𝑦𝑜𝑢’𝑙𝑙 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑝𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠.]]

𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒. 𝑐𝑜𝑚/𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑐ℎ?𝑣=4𝑍6𝑇𝑝𝑘𝑇-6𝐴𝑌

𝐼 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑤 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑑 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑤𝑒𝑏𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚, 𝑠𝑜 𝐼’𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑖𝑐𝑠 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒. 𝐼’𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 “𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒” 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑟.𝑊𝑎𝑟𝑠.4𝐾77.2160𝑝.𝑈𝐻𝐷.𝑁𝑜-𝐷𝑁𝑅.35𝑚𝑚.𝑥265-𝑣1.4 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛:

𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑓. 𝑐𝑜𝑚/𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑠/𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠/𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑑-20𝑡ℎ-𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑦-𝑓𝑜𝑥-𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜-𝑝𝑛𝑔.1992607/
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑓. 𝑐𝑜𝑚/𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑠/𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠/05-𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟-𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑠-4𝑘77-2160𝑝-𝑢ℎ𝑑-𝑛𝑜-𝑑𝑛𝑟-35𝑚𝑚-𝑥265-𝑣1-4-𝑚𝑘𝑣_𝑠𝑛𝑎𝑝𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑡_00-00-05-858-𝑗𝑝𝑔.1992590/
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑓. 𝑐𝑜𝑚/𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑠/𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠/𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒-𝑖𝑣-𝑏𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑦-𝑝𝑛𝑔.1992608/
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑓. 𝑐𝑜𝑚/𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑠/𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠/05-𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟-𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑠-4𝑘77-2160𝑝-𝑢ℎ𝑑-𝑛𝑜-𝑑𝑛𝑟-35𝑚𝑚-𝑥265-𝑣1-4-𝑚𝑘𝑣_𝑠𝑛𝑎𝑝𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑡_00-02-35-185-𝑗𝑝𝑔.1992592/
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑓. 𝑐𝑜𝑚/𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑠/𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠/𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒-𝑖𝑣-𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟-𝑝𝑛𝑔.1992609/
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑓. 𝑐𝑜𝑚/𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑠/𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠/05-𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟-𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑠-4𝑘77-2160𝑝-𝑢ℎ𝑑-𝑛𝑜-𝑑𝑛𝑟-35𝑚𝑚-𝑥265-𝑣1-4-𝑚𝑘𝑣_𝑠𝑛𝑎𝑝𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑡_00-02-35-193-𝑗𝑝𝑔.1992593/

𝑁𝑜𝑤, 𝐼 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑇𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑, 𝑠𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝐼 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 4𝐾 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑠𝑜 𝑖𝑡 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑦 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑, 𝑎𝑡 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝐼 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒.

𝑆𝑜, 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝑑. 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑒’𝑠 𝑚𝑦 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑒𝑠, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑖𝑐 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑠:

• 𝑇ℎ𝑒 “𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛” 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑡𝑜𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑚 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑡. 𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑦 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 20𝑡ℎ 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑦 𝐹𝑜𝑥 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑑. 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝐼 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 20𝑡ℎ 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 (𝐼 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑡 𝑜𝑛 𝑎 16𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑛 4𝑘80). 𝐵𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑏𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑠 𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑠 𝑜𝑑𝑑. 𝑀𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛’𝑡 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝐼 𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑜 “𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑛” 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑠, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑖𝑔 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐴𝐼/𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑢𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑡𝑜𝑜 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑓𝑙𝑎𝑡, 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 “𝐶𝐺.”
  𝐼𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑑 𝑝𝑖𝑐𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐼𝑉, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑏𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙, 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑠. 𝐼 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑎 𝑏𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑠𝑜 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑦 4𝐾77 𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑡 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑛. 𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙.

• 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑚. 𝐴𝑙𝑠𝑜, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 20𝑡ℎ 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑙𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐼𝑉 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡, 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 4𝐾77 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛. 𝐼𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑑, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑜 𝑏𝑙𝑢𝑒. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 “𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛” 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑦 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑒. 𝐼’𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑜𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑟 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑊𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑚 ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒, 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑏𝑦 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝐷𝑟. 𝐷𝑟𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑛 𝑔𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒, 𝑠𝑜 𝐼’𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 “𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛” 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒.

• 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑑 - 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐶-3𝑃𝑂’𝑠 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑙𝑦 𝑐𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 “𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛” 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅2’𝑠 𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓𝑓 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒. 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ, 𝑢𝑛𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑚 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑏𝑎𝑑 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑝𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑝 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑏𝑡, 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 4𝐾77 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔. 𝑌𝑜𝑢’𝑑 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑠, 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑇𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑁𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 1 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ. 𝐼 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑛 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑝, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡’𝑠 𝑖𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑠𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑔𝑒𝑠.

𝐴𝑙𝑙 𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑙, 𝑖𝑡 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 “𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.” 𝐼𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑛𝑒𝑦, 𝑚𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑠𝑛’𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑢𝑝 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑑𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠. 𝑂𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑛𝑒𝑦 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑎𝑦, 𝐼 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤. 𝐼𝑡 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑦 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘. 𝐼𝑡 𝑏𝑢𝑔𝑠 𝑚𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑔𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 “𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛” 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑇𝑢𝑏𝑒. 𝐼 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑒𝑦𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑙𝑒𝑑𝑔𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑚 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑑, 𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑑𝑜𝑛’𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑦-𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑑, 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟-𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑑.

Thank you, I appreciate your help.

oojason said:

bloop said:

Hey, long time lurker. I just registered because I never had much to post about. I saw the supposed “leaked restoration footage” on youtube and wanted to share some observations and thoughts.

Discussion on the ALI OOT Restoration can be found in here…