logo Sign In

The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS ** — Page 190

Author
Time

NeverarGreat said:

According to ‘# of movies they’ve been in’, Palpatine, Obi-wan, Yoda, and Anakin are the main characters in the saga.

I thought it was Chewbacca, R2-D2, and C-3P0.

Author
Time

rodneyfaile said:

NeverarGreat said:

According to ‘# of movies they’ve been in’, Palpatine, Obi-wan, Yoda, and Anakin are the main characters in the saga.

I thought it was Chewbacca, R2-D2, and C-3P0.

+1

and i would add the Millennium Falcon to that.

Author
Time

R2 and 3PO win by default, since they’re in every film.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

DrDre said:

The ST is meant to be part of a larger overarching story.

Again this is just your desire/opinion. I don’t care about the development of characters from PT to OT, and furthermore trying to use that as a justification for calling character development a “plot hole” just doesn’t work.

Which is your opinion, and arguing semantics.

TV’s Frink said:

Words mean things. Plot holes are something specific, and are not what you are describing. It’s not semantics.

But ok. I said I give up before, I mean it this time.

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

Words mean things. Plot holes are something specific, and are not what you are describing. It’s not semantics.

But ok. I said I give up before, I mean it this time.

“Arguing semantics is a derogatory term used by one party in an argument to resist the other party’s attempt to question the terms and language used in the argument.”

I’ve explained what my issues are with the ST, which is the point, I’m trying to get across. Despite this you continue to avoid the topic, by arguing about the meaning of a word (semantics) I used to summarize my argument. A word I would gladly replace by a more appropriate term, if that makes you happy, as I’ve indicated. Ergo, you are arguing semantics. I would like to get away from semantics, and discuss the issues I’ve raised with those posters, interested in discussing them.

Actually, the full quora.com post is…

'“Arguing semantics” is a derogatory term used by one party in an argument to resist the other party’s attempt to question the terms and language used in the argument. This is generally done because the current terms favor his / her position.

In this situation the first party will often feign impatience – “Come on, let’s stop quibbling about semantics and get on with things!”’

 

I don’t see Frink stating ‘arguing semantics’? Do you?

And it certainly wasn’t used as a derogatory term by him - as you inferred by mentioning it in your post.
 

A word of warning - tread carefully when trying to cast aspersions of using a ‘derogatory term’ onto others.
 

That is all - thank you.

A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.

Author
Time

I think the answer to this is to look at what BOTH movies are telling us.

Han: I know every time … every time you look at me you’re reminded of him
Leia: You think I want to forget him? I want him back.
Han: There is nothing more we could have done. There’s too much Vader in him.
Leia: That’s why I wanted him to train with Luke but… I just never should have sent him away. That’s when I lost him. That’s when I lost you both.
Han: We both had to deal with it in our own way. I went back to the only thing I was ever any good at.
Leia: We both did.
Han: We lost our son, forever.
Leia: No, it was Snoke. He seduced our son to the dark side. But we can still save him. Me… you.
Han: If Luke couldn’t reach him how could I.
Leia: Luke is a Jedi. You’re his father. There’s still light in him, I know it.

Rey: Master Skywalker, we need you to bring the Jedi back because Kylo Ren is strong with the dark side of the force. Without the Jedi we won’t stand a chance against him.
Luke: What do you know about the force?
Rey: It’s a power that Jedi have that let’s them control people and make things float.
Luke: Impressive. Every word in that sentence was wrong. Lesson one, sit here, legs crossed. The force is not a power you have. It’s not about lifting rocks. It’s the energy between all things. The tension… the balance that binds the universe together.
Rey: Ok. But what is it?
Luke: Close your eyes. Breathe. Now, reach out.
Rey literally reaches out her hand and Luke used a long leaf to tap her hand. Rey gasps.
Rey: I feel something.
Luke: Do you feel it?
Rey: Yes, I feel it.
Luke: That’s the force
Rey: Really?
Luke: Wow, it must be really strong with you.
Rey: Oh, I’ve never felt any…
Luke hits Rey’s hand with the leaf.
Rey: Ow!
Rey looks at him hurt and he looks back and her and then she realizes her mistake.
Rey: You meant reach out like… I’ll try again.
Luke: Breathe. Just breathe. Reach out with your feelings. What do you see?
Rey: The island. Life. Death and decay that feeds new life. Warmth. Cold. Peace. Violence.
Luke: And between it all?
Rey: Balance and energy. A force.
Luke: And inside you?
Rey: And inside me, that same force.
Luke: And this is the lesson. That force does not belong to the Jedi. To say that if the Jedi die the light dies is vanity. Can you feel that.
Rey: There’s something else. Beneath the island. A Place. A dark place.
Luke: Balance - powerful light, powerful darknes.
Rey: It’s cold.
The rock breaks and the pebbles on the rock start to float.
Rey: It’s calling me.
Luke: Resist it, Rey. Rey! Rey!
A wave blows up through the whole and breaks Rey’s concentration. Rey gasps for breath.
Luke: You went straight to the dark.
Rey: That place was trying to show me something.
Luke: It offered something you needed… and you didn’t even try to stop yourself.
Rey: I didn’t see you. Nothing from you. You’ve closed yourself off from the force. Of course you have.
Luke: I’ve seen this raw strength only once before, in Ben Solo. I didn’t scare me enough then, it does now.

Luke: Lesson two. Now that they’re extinct, the Jedi are romanticized, deified. But if you strip away the myth and look at their deeds, the legacy of the Jedi is failure, hypocrisy, hubris.
Rey: That’s not true.
Luke: At the height of their powers, they allowed Darth Sideous to rise, create the Empire and wipe them out. It was a Jedi master who was responsible for training and creation of Darth Vader.
Rey: And a Jedi who saved him. Yes, the most hated man in the galaxy, but you saw there was conflict inside him. You believed that he wasn’t gone, that he could be turned.
Luke: And I became a legend. For many years there was balance, and then I saw… Ben, my nephew, with that mighty Skywalker blood. In my hubris I thought I could train him, I could pass on my strengths. Han was… Han about it, but Leia… trusted me with her son. I took him and a dozen students and began a training temple. By the time I realized I was no match for the darkness rising in him, it was too late.
Rey: What happened?
Luke: I went to confront him and he turned on me. (Vision - Luke: Ben, No! - shows unarmed Luke and unarmed Ben maing the hut collapse) He must have thought I was dead. When I came too, the temple was burning. He had vanished with a handful of my students and slaughtered the rest. Leia blamed Snoke, but it was me. I failed… Because I was Luke Skykwalker, Jedi Master… a legend.
Rey: The galaxy may need a legend, I need someone to show me my place in all this. And you didn’t fail Kylo. Kylo failed you. I won’t.

Rey: I’d rather not do this now.
Kylo: Yeah, me too.
Rey: Why did you hate your father? Do you have something? A towel or something you can put on? Why did you hate your father? Give me an honest answer. You had a father who loved you, he gave a damn about you.
Kylo: I didn’t hate him.
Rey: They why?
Kylo: Why what? Why what? Say it.
Rey: Why did you… why did you kill him? I don’t understand.
Kylo: No, Your parents threw you away like garbage.
Rey: They didn’t.
Kylo: They did, but you can’t stop needing them. It’s your greatest weakness. Looking for them every where. Inn Han Solo, now in Skywalker. Did he tell you what happened that night?
Rey: Yes!
Kylo: No. He had sensed my power, as he senses yours, and he feared it. (Vision of Kylo waking up to Luke holding his green lightsaber and Luke striking and Kylo defending and then collapsing the hut).
Rey: Liar.
Kylo: Let the past die. Kill it if you have to. That is the only way to become who you were meant to be.

Rey: I should have felt trapped or panicked, but I didn’t. It didn’t go on forever. I knew it was leading somewhere… and at the end it would show me what I came to see. (let me see… my parents… please) I thought I’d find answers here. I was wrong. I never felt so alone.
Kylo: you are not alone.
Rey: Neither are you.
Luke: (from a distance) Rey!
Rey: It isn’t too late.
Kylo and Rey touch then Luke appears and the connection breaks.
Luke: Stop!
Rey: Is it true? Did you try to murder him?
Luke: Leave this island now!
Rey: Stop! Stop! Did you do it? Did you create Kylo Ren?
Luke and Rey fight until Rey grabs the saber and Luke stumbles.
Rey: Tell me the truth.
Luke: I saw darkness. I’d sensed it building in him. I’d seen it in moments during his training. But then I looked inside and it was beyond what I’d ever imagined. (Vision - sound of screaming people) Shoke had already turned his heart. He would bring destruction and pain and death and the end of everything I loved because of what he will become and for the briefest of pure instinct I thought I could stop it. (Vision - luke draws and ignites his green lightsaber). It passed like a fleeting shadow and I was left with shame and with consequence and the last thing I saw were the eyes of a frighted boy whose master had failed him. (Vision - Kylo sees Luke and they lock eyes and then Kylo draws his blue saber and strikes at Luke. Luke: Ben, No. Then Kylo brings down the hut)
Rey: You failed him by thinking his choice was made. It wasn’t. There’s still conflict in him. If he would turn from the dark side that could shift the tide. This could be how we win.
Luke: This is not going to go the way you think.
Rey. It is. Just now, when we touched hands, I saw his future. As solid as I’m seeing you. If I go to him, Ben Solo will turn.
Luke: Rey, don’t do this.
Rey stands and offers him the lightsaber. Luke looks away
Rey: Then he’s our last hope.
The Millenium Falcon flies off. Luke changes to his white robes, goes to the tree and ignites a torch, then sees Yoda
Luke: Master Yoda.
Yoda: Young Skywalker.
Luke: I’m ending all of this, the tree, the texts, the Jedi. I’m going to burn it down.
Luke goes to the tree but hesitates.
Yoda: Hm.
Yoda raises a finger. From the clouds above, lightning strikes the tree and it catches fire.
Yoda: [laughing] Ah, Skywalker, missed you have I.
Luke tries to go in to save the text but a gout of flame pushes him back.
Luke: So it is time for the Jedi Order to end.
Yoda: Time it is… for you to look past a pile of old books.
Luke: The sacred Jedi texts!
Yoda: Oo? Read them have you?
Luke: Well… I…
Yoda: Page turners they were not. Yes, yes, yes, wisdom they held, but that library contained nothing that the girl Rey does not already posses. Hm. Skywalker, still looking to the horizon. Here, here, now, the need in front your nose. Hm!
Luke: I was weak, unwise.
Yoda: Lost Ben Solo you did. Lose Rey we must not.
Luke: I can’t be what she needs me to be.
Yoda: Heed my words not did you. Pass on what you have learned. Strength, mastery, hm! But weakness, folly, failure also. Yes failure most of all. The greatest teacher failure is. Hm. Luke, we are what they grow beyond. That is the true burden of all masters.

Leia: Luke. I know what you are going to say. I changed my hair.
Luke: It looks nice that way. Leia, I’m sorry.
Leia: I know. I know you are. I’m just glad you’re here… at the end.
Luke: I came to face him, Leia, and I can’t save him.
Leia: I held out hope for so long, but I know my son is gone.
Luke: No one is every really gone.

Well, that is as close as I can get barring an official script

The key is Ben’s fall. The dialog from TFA between Han and Leia shows he was heading down the dark path before Luke ever started training him. Snoke had already gotten to him. Luke believed he could correct it by following the Jedi training. But he saw hints during training but never imagined that it was too late. Ben had used the training to find others like him and they killed the rest and fled after the hut incident.

One of the keys is to see how Hammil acts the scenes. Luke is not crushed because a student turned. He is crushed because it was his nephew, Leia’s son. He is crushed because he was sure he could stop it but it was already too late. Leia rightly blamed snoke, but for the man who had saved his father, the most hated and evil man the galaxy had known (they didn’t really know Sideous), to lose his nephew like that is a blow that he couldn’t take. In the movies he says he went to the island to die, but, like other Jedi masters and like himself in regards to the full truth about the fall of Ben Solo, I doubt we got the real truth. I think he went to Ach-to looking for answers and when he didn’t find them in the greatest wisdom of the Jedi, he sank his X-wing and decided to live the rest of his life in solitude. We saw in ANH how he hungered to learn anything about his father. Owen and Beru tied him to Tatooine and only their deaths set him on the path. He cherishes family. We saw that again as he talked with Leia in ROTJ. That was the trigger that lead to him channeling the dark side to defeat Vader. Family is what turned Anakin both to the dark side and back again. Luke could not save his nephew and was crushed. He did not fear the raw power Ben had shown (contrary to what Kylo tells Rey) but he fears that same raw power in Rey.

So, given the above dialog (that the way the lines are delivered), the fall of Ben Solo was set in motion before he ever went to study with his uncle and Luke was no match for the darkness that Snoke had sparked. The fall of Ben Solo was a certainty, not a maybe. He had already fallen, he just hadn’t revealed himself yet. From his worship of Vader’s helmet, and the dialog in TFA, he wanted to follow his grandfather into darkness. And Luke completely missed all of it, like the PT Jedi missed Darth Sideous right under their noses. When you put everything together, Luke’s failure is epic. Luke should have been training Kylo from his childhood, not when Han and Leia were having problems with him. There is a reason the Jedi started the training at a very young age.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

oojason said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

DrDre said:

The ST is meant to be part of a larger overarching story.

Again this is just your desire/opinion. I don’t care about the development of characters from PT to OT, and furthermore trying to use that as a justification for calling character development a “plot hole” just doesn’t work.

Which is your opinion, and arguing semantics.

TV’s Frink said:

Words mean things. Plot holes are something specific, and are not what you are describing. It’s not semantics.

But ok. I said I give up before, I mean it this time.

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

Words mean things. Plot holes are something specific, and are not what you are describing. It’s not semantics.

But ok. I said I give up before, I mean it this time.

“Arguing semantics is a derogatory term used by one party in an argument to resist the other party’s attempt to question the terms and language used in the argument.”

I’ve explained what my issues are with the ST, which is the point, I’m trying to get across. Despite this you continue to avoid the topic, by arguing about the meaning of a word (semantics) I used to summarize my argument. A word I would gladly replace by a more appropriate term, if that makes you happy, as I’ve indicated. Ergo, you are arguing semantics. I would like to get away from semantics, and discuss the issues I’ve raised with those posters, interested in discussing them.

Actually, the full quora.com post is…

'“Arguing semantics” is a derogatory term used by one party in an argument to resist the other party’s attempt to question the terms and language used in the argument. This is generally done because the current terms favor his / her position.

In this situation the first party will often feign impatience – “Come on, let’s stop quibbling about semantics and get on with things!”’

 

I don’t see Frink stating ‘arguing semantics’? Do you?

And it certainly wasn’t used as a derogatory term by him - as you inferred by mentioning it in your post.
 

A word of warning - tread carefully when trying to cast aspersions of using a ‘derogatory term’ onto others.
 

That is all - thank you.

I was the one who said Frink was arguing semantics, not the other way around. I was getting impatient with Frink for banging on about my choice of words or specifically a word, when I wanted to debate an argument. I already stated, I would be happy to use an other term to summarize my criticisms. Despite this fact, Frink further debated the meaning of the word I used previously, hence my response, where I reiterated, why I felt he was arguing semantics, rather than debating the argument.

Author
Time

DrDre said:

oojason said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

DrDre said:

The ST is meant to be part of a larger overarching story.

Again this is just your desire/opinion. I don’t care about the development of characters from PT to OT, and furthermore trying to use that as a justification for calling character development a “plot hole” just doesn’t work.

Which is your opinion, and arguing semantics.

TV’s Frink said:

Words mean things. Plot holes are something specific, and are not what you are describing. It’s not semantics.

But ok. I said I give up before, I mean it this time.

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

Words mean things. Plot holes are something specific, and are not what you are describing. It’s not semantics.

But ok. I said I give up before, I mean it this time.

“Arguing semantics is a derogatory term used by one party in an argument to resist the other party’s attempt to question the terms and language used in the argument.”

I’ve explained what my issues are with the ST, which is the point, I’m trying to get across. Despite this you continue to avoid the topic, by arguing about the meaning of a word (semantics) I used to summarize my argument. A word I would gladly replace by a more appropriate term, if that makes you happy, as I’ve indicated. Ergo, you are arguing semantics. I would like to get away from semantics, and discuss the issues I’ve raised with those posters, interested in discussing them.

Actually, the full quora.com post is…

'“Arguing semantics” is a derogatory term used by one party in an argument to resist the other party’s attempt to question the terms and language used in the argument. This is generally done because the current terms favor his / her position.

In this situation the first party will often feign impatience – “Come on, let’s stop quibbling about semantics and get on with things!”’

 

I don’t see Frink stating ‘arguing semantics’? Do you?

And it certainly wasn’t used as a derogatory term by him - as you inferred by mentioning it in your post.
 

A word of warning - tread carefully when trying to cast aspersions of using a ‘derogatory term’ onto others.
 

That is all - thank you.

I was the one who said Frink was arguing semantics, not the other way around. I was getting impatient with Frink for banging on about my choice of words or specifically a word, when I wanted to debate an argument. I already stated, I would be happy to use an other term to summarize my criticisms. Despite this fact, Frink further debated the meaning of the word I used previously, hence my response, where I reiterated, why I felt he was arguing semantics, rather than debating the argument.

I agree with Dre on this

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Collipso said:

TV’s Frink said:

DrDre said:

Creox said:

DrDre said:

yotsuya said:

DrDre said:

yotsuya said:

DrDre said:

yhwx said:

It’s amazing how people have selective amnesia. Yes, Luke did throw away his saber in ROTJ, but a few seconds before, he was about to kill Vader. And a few minutes before that, he’s prepared to “strike down” the Emperor, only to have his faithful apprentice intercept the attack.

I would call that a character arc. These things didn’t happen in a random order. Luke get’s goaded into using force, first by Palps, then by Vader to the point of almost killing Vader. Luke realizes he’s about to follow in his father footsteps, and composes himself, tossing away his lightsaber. He’s learned a valuable lesson, and passed the test. A test he then again fails in TLJ.

How did he fail that same test? Aren’t his actions just consistent with how he was portrayed in ROTJ? A person doesn’t stop making mistakes just because they make the right decision one time. As you pointed out, the Emperor goaded Luke into striking. Vader goaded Luke into striking. He seems to like striking and be easily goaded and then later comes to his senses. How then is going to Ben’s hut to confront him and freaking out about how far he has fallen and igniting his light saber out of character. It seems totally in character by the very example you have provided. That is his MO. React on instinct and then let his wisdom rein him in. You have just proven with your own examples that Luke’s actions in Ben’s hut are 100% consistent with ROTJ Luke.

I don’t agree. The idea of a character arc is, that people make a journey, usually learning from their mistakes, such that they don’t make that mistake again. In TESB Luke drew his weapon first when confronted with Vader, itching for a fight. In ROTJ Luke had to be goaded into a fight, and he resisted the Emperor for a long time, despite the real threat and suffering he faced. Luke learned from his experience in TESB, as he learned from his experience in ROTJ to finally become a Jedi. So, after ROTJ Luke should have grown beyond such mistakes in my view. The situation with the possible future of Ben Solo pales in comparison to Luke’s previous real experiences from my point of view, and so he should have been able to control himself. Let’s not forget Luke has had at least two decades to learn from his experiences before his fallout with young Ben, and to grow as a Jedi Master. Yet, TLJ seems to suggest the opposite happened. Luke regressed, and turned out to have become a far worse Jedi than Obi-Wan or Yoda, despite growing beyond their dogma in ROTJ.

When did we see Luke actually learn from his mistakes? We see him make similar mistakes over and over again and we never see him really grow past it.

I gave you a very clear example in my previous post.

And why should the fall of his nephew not shake him to the core?

It should shake him to the core, but he’s been trained to deal with this stuff both by studying and experience. A fireman is not supposed to freak out at the idea of having to put out a big fire, especially when we saw him put out bigger fires in the past, and he should certainly not give up while the fire is still small, and allow it to burn the house down.

You are building Luke up as a legend and not seeing the flaws he carried right to the end of ROTJ.

And you refuse to acknowledge the growth of Luke’s character over the course of three films.

When Luke threw down his saber and faced the Emperor he knew that he was likely to die. The Emperor didn’t goad him any further, he just tried to kill him. But there is no big huge change in Luke’s personality.

I think you are wrong. For Luke to throw away his weapon in the face of danger, and to resign himself is a major progression of his character. Just look at how he refused to leave his weapon when Yoda suggested he didn’t need it in the Dagobah dark side cave. The Luke who proclaims himself a Jedi is a very different person from the one who enters the cave. That is character progression. It’s poor story telling in my view to then just wipe that all off the table with a sixty second flashback, and more or less say Luke’s different now, move along.

so him making a similar mistake due to the horror of seeing how far his nephew had fallen already could be shock enough for him to act on instinct over intelligence for a moment. I don’t know why that is so hard to believe of his character. His arc was to redeem his father, not to be the perfect Jedi.

No, but his arc was to become a capable one, not one of the worst Jedi in history. Luke became one of the lost 20. The only thing that could have happened, that would be worse, is Luke joining the dark side. At least the PT took three movies to explain (poorly) how Anakin turned from a young hero into an evil monster. TLJ condensed a similar character arc into a sixty second flashback. That won’t do for me.

The one fact that is missed in many discussions surrounding your points is that 30 years have passed. That is a long time to consider ones life and choices, good and bad.

The other thing I was thinking about with regards to the horror Luke feels when he searches Kylo is that Kylo was likely being influenced by Snoke for quite a while by then. It is possible that Luke was sensing the Supreme Leader or at least his evil presence along with Kylo’s turning. This would cause Luke to respond as he does imo.

It might, but IMO thirty years passing is no excuse for plot holes.

I know it’s pointless to bring it up but they aren’t plot holes. You just wanted something different than what you got. Not the same thing.

I think a better way to describe would be “character inconsistencies”.

Just a reminder that this is all that needed to be said, and I accepted it immediately. But nah, let’s spend a few pages arguing instead. An especially effective tactic is to start quoting definitions…that always ends the argument, right?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

Collipso said:

TV’s Frink said:

DrDre said:

Creox said:

DrDre said:

yotsuya said:

DrDre said:

yotsuya said:

DrDre said:

yhwx said:

It’s amazing how people have selective amnesia. Yes, Luke did throw away his saber in ROTJ, but a few seconds before, he was about to kill Vader. And a few minutes before that, he’s prepared to “strike down” the Emperor, only to have his faithful apprentice intercept the attack.

I would call that a character arc. These things didn’t happen in a random order. Luke get’s goaded into using force, first by Palps, then by Vader to the point of almost killing Vader. Luke realizes he’s about to follow in his father footsteps, and composes himself, tossing away his lightsaber. He’s learned a valuable lesson, and passed the test. A test he then again fails in TLJ.

How did he fail that same test? Aren’t his actions just consistent with how he was portrayed in ROTJ? A person doesn’t stop making mistakes just because they make the right decision one time. As you pointed out, the Emperor goaded Luke into striking. Vader goaded Luke into striking. He seems to like striking and be easily goaded and then later comes to his senses. How then is going to Ben’s hut to confront him and freaking out about how far he has fallen and igniting his light saber out of character. It seems totally in character by the very example you have provided. That is his MO. React on instinct and then let his wisdom rein him in. You have just proven with your own examples that Luke’s actions in Ben’s hut are 100% consistent with ROTJ Luke.

I don’t agree. The idea of a character arc is, that people make a journey, usually learning from their mistakes, such that they don’t make that mistake again. In TESB Luke drew his weapon first when confronted with Vader, itching for a fight. In ROTJ Luke had to be goaded into a fight, and he resisted the Emperor for a long time, despite the real threat and suffering he faced. Luke learned from his experience in TESB, as he learned from his experience in ROTJ to finally become a Jedi. So, after ROTJ Luke should have grown beyond such mistakes in my view. The situation with the possible future of Ben Solo pales in comparison to Luke’s previous real experiences from my point of view, and so he should have been able to control himself. Let’s not forget Luke has had at least two decades to learn from his experiences before his fallout with young Ben, and to grow as a Jedi Master. Yet, TLJ seems to suggest the opposite happened. Luke regressed, and turned out to have become a far worse Jedi than Obi-Wan or Yoda, despite growing beyond their dogma in ROTJ.

When did we see Luke actually learn from his mistakes? We see him make similar mistakes over and over again and we never see him really grow past it.

I gave you a very clear example in my previous post.

And why should the fall of his nephew not shake him to the core?

It should shake him to the core, but he’s been trained to deal with this stuff both by studying and experience. A fireman is not supposed to freak out at the idea of having to put out a big fire, especially when we saw him put out bigger fires in the past, and he should certainly not give up while the fire is still small, and allow it to burn the house down.

You are building Luke up as a legend and not seeing the flaws he carried right to the end of ROTJ.

And you refuse to acknowledge the growth of Luke’s character over the course of three films.

When Luke threw down his saber and faced the Emperor he knew that he was likely to die. The Emperor didn’t goad him any further, he just tried to kill him. But there is no big huge change in Luke’s personality.

I think you are wrong. For Luke to throw away his weapon in the face of danger, and to resign himself is a major progression of his character. Just look at how he refused to leave his weapon when Yoda suggested he didn’t need it in the Dagobah dark side cave. The Luke who proclaims himself a Jedi is a very different person from the one who enters the cave. That is character progression. It’s poor story telling in my view to then just wipe that all off the table with a sixty second flashback, and more or less say Luke’s different now, move along.

so him making a similar mistake due to the horror of seeing how far his nephew had fallen already could be shock enough for him to act on instinct over intelligence for a moment. I don’t know why that is so hard to believe of his character. His arc was to redeem his father, not to be the perfect Jedi.

No, but his arc was to become a capable one, not one of the worst Jedi in history. Luke became one of the lost 20. The only thing that could have happened, that would be worse, is Luke joining the dark side. At least the PT took three movies to explain (poorly) how Anakin turned from a young hero into an evil monster. TLJ condensed a similar character arc into a sixty second flashback. That won’t do for me.

The one fact that is missed in many discussions surrounding your points is that 30 years have passed. That is a long time to consider ones life and choices, good and bad.

The other thing I was thinking about with regards to the horror Luke feels when he searches Kylo is that Kylo was likely being influenced by Snoke for quite a while by then. It is possible that Luke was sensing the Supreme Leader or at least his evil presence along with Kylo’s turning. This would cause Luke to respond as he does imo.

It might, but IMO thirty years passing is no excuse for plot holes.

I know it’s pointless to bring it up but they aren’t plot holes. You just wanted something different than what you got. Not the same thing.

I think a better way to describe would be “character inconsistencies”.

Just a reminder that this is all that needed to be said, and I accepted it immediately. But nah, let’s spend a few pages arguing instead. An especially effective tactic is to start quoting definitions…that always ends the argument, right?

I agree with Frink on this

an argument is “an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.”

so well done all.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Just to clarify, I only pointed out the terminology he used was incorrect. I don’t see any point in debating the same “Luke acted correct vs. not correct” thing for the millionth time.

Author
Time

I left this thread on page 14, and now I’m on the bottom of page 190.
Is it possible to have a short summary of the 176 last pages ?

Author
Time

Just read the top of page 190. The rest is basically like that.

Ceci n’est pas une signature.

Author
Time

rodneyfaile said:

NeverarGreat said:

According to ‘# of movies they’ve been in’, Palpatine, Obi-wan, Yoda, and Anakin are the main characters in the saga.

I thought it was Chewbacca, R2-D2, and C-3P0.

I’m not sure this is a great summary of the whole thread but I’ll take it.

Author
Time

Thank you, I can now resume the thread of this discussion.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

rodneyfaile said:

NeverarGreat said:

According to ‘# of movies they’ve been in’, Palpatine, Obi-wan, Yoda, and Anakin are the main characters in the saga.

I thought it was Chewbacca, R2-D2, and C-3P0.

I’m not sure this is a great summary of the whole thread but I’ll take it.

The top of the page is more than one post.

Ceci n’est pas une signature.

Author
Time

Frank your Majesty said:

TV’s Frink said:

rodneyfaile said:

NeverarGreat said:

According to ‘# of movies they’ve been in’, Palpatine, Obi-wan, Yoda, and Anakin are the main characters in the saga.

I thought it was Chewbacca, R2-D2, and C-3P0.

I’m not sure this is a great summary of the whole thread but I’ll take it.

The top of the page is more than one post.

OK, I think that I see the stakes of this thread. See you on page 380.

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

Frank your Majesty said:

TV’s Frink said:

rodneyfaile said:

NeverarGreat said:

According to ‘# of movies they’ve been in’, Palpatine, Obi-wan, Yoda, and Anakin are the main characters in the saga.

I thought it was Chewbacca, R2-D2, and C-3P0.

I’m not sure this is a great summary of the whole thread but I’ll take it.

The top of the page is more than one post.

The whole page is one big post.

And look over there! DrDre and Mrebo waiting to quote us.

You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)

Author
Time

Oh that’s what that massive giant beautiful 90 foot high wall was?

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

Mrebo said:

DominicCobb said:

Mrebo said:

DominicCobb said:

Mrebo said:

DominicCobb said:

Mrebo said:

DominicCobb said:

Mrebo said:

DominicCobb said:

I guess it depends on your definition of fallen? I personally think the “Anakin died and became Vader” strict dichotomy is pretty silly.

It also depends whether we’re talking about before Luke entered the hut or after Luke searched Ben’s feelings.

So how do you define “fallen”? I don’t think having bad thoughts counts as fallen. But maybe that’s just me 😉

Luke doesn’t know Ben’s thoughts, he knows his feelings and his future, which I think are more telling.

Whether feelings or thoughts (the distinction isn’t terribly important as far as I’m concerned), perceiving the future is another matter. As Yoda said, “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future.”

And if Luke perceives that Ben might in the future fall, that is still different from perceiving that he is fallen.

But that’s not what Luke perceives. What he sees is a future where Ben does terrible things which leads his to a momentary lapse of judgement.

There’s no question of “Ben might fall” Luke makes it explicit that Ben had either already fallen or was deep in the process.

What Luke sensed in Ben’s feelings:

“I saw darkness. I sensed it building in him. I’d seen it in moments during his training. But then I looked inside, and it was beyond what I ever imagined. Snoke had already turned his heart.”

What Luke saw in Ben’s future:

“He would bring destruction, pain, death, and the end of everything I love because of what he will become.”

Saying Luke merely sensed Ben’s “bad thoughts” is dramatically underselling the situation.

When you say “that’s not what Luke perceives,” that’s not true unless you’re saying the future is certain. And we know it isn’t.

I’m saying Luke doesn’t see a future where Ben might fall because he’s already at that point. What he sees in the future is something far more horrifying than just the simple “Ben might fall.”

Your argument is that the vision Luke beheld was horrifying. My rhetoric was more tame (antihyperbole!) but I didn’t deny that it was a terrible thing to behold.

No, saying what Luke felt was simply bad thoughts is hyperbole. An exaggerated statement doesn’t have to be making something out to be bigger than it is, it can go the inverse too.

What a lot of us have trouble accepting is that Luke accepted what he saw, especially after the fact. “Snoke had already turned his heart,” means what? In large part, our appreciation for Luke is perhaps supposed to make it really meaningful. But there’s so much work being done in that line that many don’t buy.

“Snoke had already turned his heart” means exactly what it sounds like. That’s not a vision of the future in motion, that’s Luke’s perception of Ben’s current situation in that moment. I don’t know how you can disregard that. As for accepting the vision of the future? Did he really accept it as gospel or was it just something that briefly sparked a horribly misguided idea in his mind? The film would suggest the latter.

If Snoke turned Ben’s heart, that calls out for answers to why and how. I recall discussions in this forum (before TLJ) on how lacking in credibility it was that Luke could realistically have been convinced to turn to the dark side in the OT. That seems an entirely reasonable argument and I’m fairly convinced by it. There just wasn’t enough established in the movie to explain why Luke would turn.

I’ve made a similar argument, but it’s not that I don’t believe it’s possible that Luke could turn (I think they set it up quite well in ESB), I just think they dropped the ball when it came to exploring the temptation Luke should be facing throughout ROTJ.

In TLJ, we’re not given anything except Luke’s assurance that Ben was lost. We don’t know what Snoke could have possibly done to take Ben beyond the point of no return. I’m not ignoring Luke’s statement, I’m saying it doesn’t really explain anything.

Why should we have anymore than that? We don’t need to know anything more about that for the purposes of this story.

It does matter for the the credibility of this story and the characterizations. It’s strange to me that you would advocate for a movie showing as little as possible. Efficient storytelling has its virtues but if one is to accept that Snoke had an iron grip on Ben (and that Luke, of all people believed it) it calls out for more. If you can see how ROTJ dropped the ball, I don’t know how that isn’t apparent here.

I can accept that Luke saw something so horrible that raw defensive instincts kicked in. Others here have a harder time with that, but it makes sense to me. Note that is different than Luke concluding that Ben was already fallen.

So you refuse to accept a fact that the film presents then?

When it comes to a story, saying that one “refuses to accept a fact” is a strange statement. Stories are not facts that must be believed. A good story makes itself credible. If there are holes or poorly established elements, that’s the story’s problem. I’m not trying to challenge anyone’s enjoyment of the film, but there are gaps that don’t work for many of us.

This is not the story of how Ben was tempted to the dark side. He’s already Kylo Ren at the start of the film. I don’t know why you don’t see the distinction there. Yeah, we’re asked to take Snoke turning Ben to the dark side as a given. Why is that so hard to accept? I really don’t get why you won’t.

What I am addressing is Luke’s actions and thought processes. You’ve not seen me contest Ben’s turn to the dark side. That Ben was being tempted is established and accepted. Glad we cleared that up. An issue we have been discussing is whether Luke could have done something to save Ben. Specifically we are dealing with a scene that was shown from the past that is supposed to inform our understanding of both Luke and Ben. I have no trouble believing that after leaving Luke for dead Ben finally ran into the arms of Snoke. What is in dispute is that Luke concluded from Ben’s feelings alone that Ben was beyond his ability/desire to help him. And that is thin gruel in my view.

What doesn’t make sense is that Luke would give up afterward. And this goes again to the idea that Ben is lost and yet having no idea why that is. It begs for an explanation of exactly what Snoke did and of what Ben did to become beyond hope.

No and no. Luke didn’t quite give up, from his perspective going to the island to die and let the Jedi Order die with him was his solution to the problem (however misguided, of course). And I don’t quite think that Luke thinks Ben is “beyond hope,” he just doesn’t think he can help him.

And I like “antihyperbole,” AKA understatement which is not a synonym of “hyperbole” although a similar concept.

The question is why Luke thinks he can’t help Ben.

Because of the way he failed him. I don’t think Ben is quite open to the kind of strategy Luke took with his father.

Back to the real question, again. We can only guess at what influence Luke might have had with Ben. In what way did Luke fail Ben? Simply that he didn’t see Snoke’s influence? Not saying that isn’t bad, but it’s more negligence than anything.

And since I forget to respond to this…

And I like “antihyperbole,” AKA understatement which is not a synonym of “hyperbole” although a similar concept.

It’s still an exaggeration, so in my opinion it fits the definition.

I’m sorry but you are wrong. Understatement and exaggeration are opposites. An exaggeration is by definition an overstatement. We can argue about #rotjpigmen all day, but this is an open-and-shut case. For example, if you say, “Darth Vader was not a nice guy,” that’s not an exaggeration.

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time

Mrebo said:

We can argue about #rotjpigmen all day, but this is an open-and-shut case.

Hahahahahaha.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Collipso said:

TV’s Frink said:

DrDre said:

Creox said:

DrDre said:

yotsuya said:

DrDre said:

yotsuya said:

DrDre said:

yhwx said:

It’s amazing how people have selective amnesia. Yes, Luke did throw away his saber in ROTJ, but a few seconds before, he was about to kill Vader. And a few minutes before that, he’s prepared to “strike down” the Emperor, only to have his faithful apprentice intercept the attack.

I would call that a character arc. These things didn’t happen in a random order. Luke get’s goaded into using force, first by Palps, then by Vader to the point of almost killing Vader. Luke realizes he’s about to follow in his father footsteps, and composes himself, tossing away his lightsaber. He’s learned a valuable lesson, and passed the test. A test he then again fails in TLJ.

How did he fail that same test? Aren’t his actions just consistent with how he was portrayed in ROTJ? A person doesn’t stop making mistakes just because they make the right decision one time. As you pointed out, the Emperor goaded Luke into striking. Vader goaded Luke into striking. He seems to like striking and be easily goaded and then later comes to his senses. How then is going to Ben’s hut to confront him and freaking out about how far he has fallen and igniting his light saber out of character. It seems totally in character by the very example you have provided. That is his MO. React on instinct and then let his wisdom rein him in. You have just proven with your own examples that Luke’s actions in Ben’s hut are 100% consistent with ROTJ Luke.

I don’t agree. The idea of a character arc is, that people make a journey, usually learning from their mistakes, such that they don’t make that mistake again. In TESB Luke drew his weapon first when confronted with Vader, itching for a fight. In ROTJ Luke had to be goaded into a fight, and he resisted the Emperor for a long time, despite the real threat and suffering he faced. Luke learned from his experience in TESB, as he learned from his experience in ROTJ to finally become a Jedi. So, after ROTJ Luke should have grown beyond such mistakes in my view. The situation with the possible future of Ben Solo pales in comparison to Luke’s previous real experiences from my point of view, and so he should have been able to control himself. Let’s not forget Luke has had at least two decades to learn from his experiences before his fallout with young Ben, and to grow as a Jedi Master. Yet, TLJ seems to suggest the opposite happened. Luke regressed, and turned out to have become a far worse Jedi than Obi-Wan or Yoda, despite growing beyond their dogma in ROTJ.

When did we see Luke actually learn from his mistakes? We see him make similar mistakes over and over again and we never see him really grow past it.

I gave you a very clear example in my previous post.

And why should the fall of his nephew not shake him to the core?

It should shake him to the core, but he’s been trained to deal with this stuff both by studying and experience. A fireman is not supposed to freak out at the idea of having to put out a big fire, especially when we saw him put out bigger fires in the past, and he should certainly not give up while the fire is still small, and allow it to burn the house down.

You are building Luke up as a legend and not seeing the flaws he carried right to the end of ROTJ.

And you refuse to acknowledge the growth of Luke’s character over the course of three films.

When Luke threw down his saber and faced the Emperor he knew that he was likely to die. The Emperor didn’t goad him any further, he just tried to kill him. But there is no big huge change in Luke’s personality.

I think you are wrong. For Luke to throw away his weapon in the face of danger, and to resign himself is a major progression of his character. Just look at how he refused to leave his weapon when Yoda suggested he didn’t need it in the Dagobah dark side cave. The Luke who proclaims himself a Jedi is a very different person from the one who enters the cave. That is character progression. It’s poor story telling in my view to then just wipe that all off the table with a sixty second flashback, and more or less say Luke’s different now, move along.

so him making a similar mistake due to the horror of seeing how far his nephew had fallen already could be shock enough for him to act on instinct over intelligence for a moment. I don’t know why that is so hard to believe of his character. His arc was to redeem his father, not to be the perfect Jedi.

No, but his arc was to become a capable one, not one of the worst Jedi in history. Luke became one of the lost 20. The only thing that could have happened, that would be worse, is Luke joining the dark side. At least the PT took three movies to explain (poorly) how Anakin turned from a young hero into an evil monster. TLJ condensed a similar character arc into a sixty second flashback. That won’t do for me.

The one fact that is missed in many discussions surrounding your points is that 30 years have passed. That is a long time to consider ones life and choices, good and bad.

The other thing I was thinking about with regards to the horror Luke feels when he searches Kylo is that Kylo was likely being influenced by Snoke for quite a while by then. It is possible that Luke was sensing the Supreme Leader or at least his evil presence along with Kylo’s turning. This would cause Luke to respond as he does imo.

It might, but IMO thirty years passing is no excuse for plot holes.

I know it’s pointless to bring it up but they aren’t plot holes. You just wanted something different than what you got. Not the same thing.

I think a better way to describe would be “character inconsistencies”.

Just a reminder that this is all that needed to be said, and I accepted it immediately. But nah, let’s spend a few pages arguing instead. An especially effective tactic is to start quoting definitions…that always ends the argument, right?

I agree with Frink on this

an argument is “an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.”

so well done all.

Since Dom and I are also on a topic of semantics, want to add your two cents on hyperbole/exaggeration vs understatement?

The blue elephant in the room.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Mrebo said:

We can argue about #rotjpigmen all day, but this is an open-and-shut case.

Hahahahahaha.

I was hoping someone would appreciate that 😄 Had to be you.

The blue elephant in the room.