logo Sign In

MOVED THREAD (Guy Fawkes Day)

Author
Time
He is said to be "The only honorable man who ever set foot In Parliament."
Author
Time
"Remeber, remember, the 5th of november, gunpowder treason and plot. I see no reason why this gunpowder treason should ever be forgot."
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” — Nazi Reich Marshal Hermann Goering
Author
Time
Ah ... V ... a movie penned by a couple of Americans, starring an Israeli-American and an Austrailian as Brits lamenting the passing of civil rights in a dystopian future. Almost as ironic as casting a Brit to play the man who led India to freedom from the Brits.
I am fluent in over six million forms of procrastination.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
Ah ... V ... a movie penned by a couple of Americans, starring an Israeli-American and an Austrailian as Brits lamenting the passing of civil rights in a dystopian future. Almost as ironic as casting a Brit to play the man who led India to freedom from the Brits.


You got to admit it beat the hell out of LXG.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
Ah ... V ... a movie penned by a couple of Americans, starring an Israeli-American and an Austrailian as Brits lamenting the passing of civil rights in a dystopian future. Almost as ironic as casting a Brit to play the man who led India to freedom from the Brits.


Or a Welshman to play the American Batman.....or an Australian as the Scottish William Wallace.......

The list goes on.

http://i.imgur.com/7N84TM8.jpg

Author
Time
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
Ah ... V ... a movie penned by a couple of Americans, starring an Israeli-American and an Austrailian as Brits lamenting the passing of civil rights in a dystopian future. Almost as ironic as casting a Brit to play the man who led India to freedom from the Brits.


Who cares who wrote it? It's awesome-frickin' flick!

4

Author
Time
'Course it does. I'm just pointing out the irony on Guy Fawkes day.
I am fluent in over six million forms of procrastination.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Guy Fawkes is supposed to be celebrated?


Guy Fawkes Day is a British Holiday, were they would burn Guy Fawkes in effigy and stuff like that. I don't think it is really that important of a holiday anymore, but some of our members from the UK might be able to correct me if I'm wrong.
Author
Time
It's bigger than Halloween.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Number20
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Guy Fawkes is supposed to be celebrated?


Guy Fawkes Day is a British Holiday, were they would burn Guy Fawkes in effigy and stuff like that. I don't think it is really that important of a holiday anymore, but some of our members from the UK might be able to correct me if I'm wrong.




Guy Fawkes Day - or 'Bonfire Night' as it seems to be increasingly better known as - still attracts large crowds to organised bonfire and firework displays. The dressing a guy up (aka 'penny for the guy') isn't that popular anymore.

I suppose the actual day still a popular event on the calendar - but doubt many people could actually tell the story of what the whole thing is about. It certainly isn't taught in history in schools - probably be offensive to those who like going around blowing things up



A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
Ah ... V ... a movie penned by a couple of Americans, starring an Israeli-American and an Austrailian as Brits lamenting the passing of civil rights in a dystopian future. Almost as ironic as casting a Brit to play the man who led India to freedom from the Brits.


Who cares who wrote it? It's awesome-frickin' flick!


negative.
the movie took itself way too seriously and they way they went about comparing it to our world today was just too extreme and in your face.

it was a fun movie but would never deserve a second viewing.
i find it caters towards those who want to watch a smart movie but dont plan on thinking too hard.
so they throw together a movie which contains some sort of intelligent premise.. but then they dum it down so that it caters to even the most level headed viewer.

just my two cents..
"Never. I'll never turn to the darkside. You've failed your highness. I am a jedi, like my father before me."
Author
Time
it was a fun movie but would never deserve a second viewing.
i find it caters towards those who want to watch a smart movie but dont plan on thinking too hard.
so they throw together a movie which contains some sort of intelligent premise.. but then they dum it down so that it caters to even the most level headed viewer.


That's kind of the way I felt about the "Da Vinci Code" movie, but alas, that's a whole other topic.

It seemed like V for Vendetta was written by a super-liberal that couldn't quite get his point across in a subtle manner. I'm sorry, but when you stop and think about it, lines like "People should not be afraid of their governments; governments should be afraid of their people." are kind of....well, stupid. A little subtlety goes a long way.

It was okay other than that, though. I just wouldn't call it "one of the best movies of the year!" or anything.

http://i.imgur.com/7N84TM8.jpg

Author
Time
It was okay other than that, though. I just wouldn't call it "one of the best movies of the year!" or anything.


definatly not!
however i must give credit where credit is due.

Natalie Portman carried that movie. Special mention for Hugo Weaving as well.
"Never. I'll never turn to the darkside. You've failed your highness. I am a jedi, like my father before me."
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Luke Skywalker
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
Ah ... V ... a movie penned by a couple of Americans, starring an Israeli-American and an Austrailian as Brits lamenting the passing of civil rights in a dystopian future. Almost as ironic as casting a Brit to play the man who led India to freedom from the Brits.


Who cares who wrote it? It's awesome-frickin' flick!


negative.
the movie took itself way too seriously and they way they went about comparing it to our world today was just too extreme and in your face.

it was a fun movie but would never deserve a second viewing.
i find it caters towards those who want to watch a smart movie but dont plan on thinking too hard.
so they throw together a movie which contains some sort of intelligent premise.. but then they dum it down so that it caters to even the most level headed viewer.

just my two cents..


Don't think of it as anti-Bush propaganda--that's just reading too much into it. Wishful thinking by a bunch of leftist Bush-haters. The totalitarian regime in the film is far closer to what happens in the average Muslim nation (just reversed with hypothetical 'Christian' radicals in power) than anything in the modern day west.

Just think of it as an action flick with a side-dish of 'nature of tyranny' talk. IE, Tyranny begins with the individual submitting to it. It's a lesson I think Iraq sorely needs to learn lest the nutjobs completely take over the country.

4

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
The totalitarian regime in the film is far closer to what happens in the average Muslim nation (just reversed with hypothetical 'Christian' radicals in power) than anything in the modern day west.
<snip>
Tyranny begins with the individual submitting to it.

Like when we turn a blind eye to the suspension of habeas corpus in the United States.

Nah, that would never happen in the West, only in those rogue Muslim nations.
I am fluent in over six million forms of procrastination.
Author
Time
Exactly, ADM.

No, seriously, I find it rather insulting that everytime someone brings this up they utterly fail to mention that Habeus Corpus has conditions on which it can be suspended written into the very Constitution you accuse Bush of violating. If you want to argue this further, take it to the politics thread though. Anything else you post here on the subject I will ignore.

4

Author
Time
Originally posted by: sean wookie
V was in fact My favorite along with Borat.


That's Nice! *smooch* *kiss* *kiss* How much?

I love everybody. Lets all smoke some reefer and chill. Hug and kisses for everybody.