logo Sign In

What was George Lucas's worst decision with the Star Wars franchise? — Page 6

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

generalfrevious said:

Kurtz was fired because of Lucas’s ego, and the budget issues on ESB were just an excuse. Lucas could not stand someone else making a better SW movie than him, one that put story first and merchandising second. If Kurtz worked on Jedi it would have blown Empire out of the water.

The ending would have been way better but as it pertains to the totality of ROTJ it is uncertain. Surely things like Luke skipping the end of his training and the Ewoks being so focal wouldn’t have been written into the script but Kurtz’s version of ROTJ would need to do more than fixing the mistakes of the original ROTJ to be legitimately better.

The ending would have been the same. In ESB, Kurtz was not even involved in story creation to begin with. As Kasdan stated about the draft Lucas written “The structure of the story was all there”. If Lucas wanted it to end that way, Kurtz could do absolutely nothing about it.

From what I heard Kurtz’s ending was bittersweet with Luke going into exile and Han dying. Though the latter could have reportedly happened earlier in the film.

It is completely irrelevant since he had no control over the story.

Well clearly because it didn’t go his way, but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have input.

It does not mean he had any either.

真実

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

DominicCobb said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

generalfrevious said:

Kurtz was fired because of Lucas’s ego, and the budget issues on ESB were just an excuse. Lucas could not stand someone else making a better SW movie than him, one that put story first and merchandising second. If Kurtz worked on Jedi it would have blown Empire out of the water.

The ending would have been way better but as it pertains to the totality of ROTJ it is uncertain. Surely things like Luke skipping the end of his training and the Ewoks being so focal wouldn’t have been written into the script but Kurtz’s version of ROTJ would need to do more than fixing the mistakes of the original ROTJ to be legitimately better.

The ending would have been the same. In ESB, Kurtz was not even involved in story creation to begin with. As Kasdan stated about the draft Lucas written “The structure of the story was all there”. If Lucas wanted it to end that way, Kurtz could do absolutely nothing about it.

From what I heard Kurtz’s ending was bittersweet with Luke going into exile and Han dying. Though the latter could have reportedly happened earlier in the film.

It is completely irrelevant since he had no control over the story.

Well clearly because it didn’t go his way, but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have input.

It does not mean he had any either.

Let’s not be silly now.

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

imperialscum said:

DominicCobb said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

generalfrevious said:

Kurtz was fired because of Lucas’s ego, and the budget issues on ESB were just an excuse. Lucas could not stand someone else making a better SW movie than him, one that put story first and merchandising second. If Kurtz worked on Jedi it would have blown Empire out of the water.

The ending would have been way better but as it pertains to the totality of ROTJ it is uncertain. Surely things like Luke skipping the end of his training and the Ewoks being so focal wouldn’t have been written into the script but Kurtz’s version of ROTJ would need to do more than fixing the mistakes of the original ROTJ to be legitimately better.

The ending would have been the same. In ESB, Kurtz was not even involved in story creation to begin with. As Kasdan stated about the draft Lucas written “The structure of the story was all there”. If Lucas wanted it to end that way, Kurtz could do absolutely nothing about it.

From what I heard Kurtz’s ending was bittersweet with Luke going into exile and Han dying. Though the latter could have reportedly happened earlier in the film.

It is completely irrelevant since he had no control over the story.

Well clearly because it didn’t go his way, but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have input.

It does not mean he had any either.

Let’s not be silly now.

I guess “any significant” would be more diplomatic. Even in ESB script Lucas did not seem to involve him much. Brackett only met with Lucas, while Kasdan said he only interacted with Lucas and Kershner after Lucas handed him his 2nd draft. He was present at November 1978 script conference when much of it was already done.

真実

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

imperialscum said:

DominicCobb said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

generalfrevious said:

Kurtz was fired because of Lucas’s ego, and the budget issues on ESB were just an excuse. Lucas could not stand someone else making a better SW movie than him, one that put story first and merchandising second. If Kurtz worked on Jedi it would have blown Empire out of the water.

The ending would have been way better but as it pertains to the totality of ROTJ it is uncertain. Surely things like Luke skipping the end of his training and the Ewoks being so focal wouldn’t have been written into the script but Kurtz’s version of ROTJ would need to do more than fixing the mistakes of the original ROTJ to be legitimately better.

The ending would have been the same. In ESB, Kurtz was not even involved in story creation to begin with. As Kasdan stated about the draft Lucas written “The structure of the story was all there”. If Lucas wanted it to end that way, Kurtz could do absolutely nothing about it.

From what I heard Kurtz’s ending was bittersweet with Luke going into exile and Han dying. Though the latter could have reportedly happened earlier in the film.

It is completely irrelevant since he had no control over the story.

Well clearly because it didn’t go his way, but that doesn’t mean he didn’t have input.

It does not mean he had any either.

Let’s not be silly now.

Why stop now?

Author
Time

He can stop at any time and join me on the non-silly side.

真実

Author
Time

Does that side provide cookies and refreshments?

Author
Time

I think GL selling was the best thing he could have done after butchering his masterpieces and destroying everything he did by creating those 'other’films. Disney murdering Star Wars is inevitable and expected, the PT was a huge shock! The Han solo car crash is coming, tfa was crap and Rogue One was a good film trying to break out. I wish they’d spent a bit more time on R1 and maybe it could have been accepted. I await a plethora of shite films.

Author
Time

Burying the originals is obviously George’s worst decision, but at a close second I would say his decision to shoot AotC and RotS on measly 2/3" digital cameras long before that technology was ready (it’s only in the last four or five years that we’ve gotten digital cameras that even come close to replicating the look of actual 35mm cinemascope) and his obsession with green screen and cgi in general.

I also want to say “directing the prequels himself,” but it’s hard to blame him for that when he offered the job to his friends (Howard, Zemeckis, et al) and they all turned it down saying George should do it. I guess it’s all their fault!

Then there’s the creation of the Special Edition, which ultimately should never have happened, but a world where the SE never happened kind of goes hand in hand with a world where George successfully handed over the PT to other directors (or at least directed it himself without going digital crazy).

Author
Time

Fang Zei said:

Burying the originals is obviously George’s worst decision, but at a close second I would say his decision to shoot AotC and RotS on measly 2/3" digital cameras long before that technology was ready (it’s only in the last four or five years that we’ve gotten digital cameras that even come close to replicating the look of actual 35mm cinemascope) and his obsession with green screen and cgi in general.

Just ignoring the prequels does wonders for these concerns.

Then there’s the creation of the Special Edition, which ultimately should never have happened

Why? Who cares?

Author
Time

There was nothing wrong with George doing a special edition.

Attempting to erase the originals from history…that’s a completely different matter though.

Author
Time

IP55 said:

I think GL selling was the best thing he could have done after butchering his masterpieces and destroying everything he did by creating those 'other’films. Disney murdering Star Wars is inevitable and expected, the PT was a huge shock! The Han solo car crash is coming, tfa was crap and Rogue One was a good film trying to break out. I wish they’d spent a bit more time on R1 and maybe it could have been accepted. I await a plethora of shite films.

Damn, how good does a movie have to be for you to “accept” it? Whatever that means.

Author
Time

Alderaan said:

There was nothing wrong with George doing a special edition.

Attempting to erase the originals from history…that’s a completely different matter though.

Exactly, what he should have done is like what James Cameron did with Aliens on DVD and Blu Ray. There should be an option to watch either version.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Alderaan said:

Attempting to erase the originals from history…that’s a completely different matter though.

That’s simply not true. Never did he attempt to erase them from history. For a while he might have attempted to erase them from the free market, but not history. Empire of Dreams is essentially about the making of the OOT, he released them in 2006, and he included some old, classic documentaries on the making of the OOT as special features.

The Person in Question

Author
Time

“Erase” may be hyperbole but he did try to cover the OUT with a foot of manure with the hopes no one would notice.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

moviefreakedmind said:

Alderaan said:

Attempting to erase the originals from history…that’s a completely different matter though.

That’s simply not true. Never did he attempt to erase them from history. For a while he might have attempted to erase them from the free market, but not history. Empire of Dreams is essentially about the making of the OOT, he released them in 2006, and he included some old, classic documentaries on the making of the OOT as special features.

Empire of Dreams was released in 2004 and is pretty bad when it comes to revisionist history actually (though not really in regards to SE stuff).

And the classic docs didn’t show up until '11.

Author
Time

Only two of the classic docs showed up on Blu Ray, in the form of ancient video masters. Star Wars To Jedi:The Making Of A Saga was a curious omission, but they did need room for all those parodies, didn’t they? 😉

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

ray_afraid said:

I dunno if it’s been mentioned, but not taking a year off after ESB to spend with his wife (as he had promised) was the beginning of the end in many ways. I might list that as the #1.

This might be the first time I’ve heard that story.

We never would’ve gotten Raiders, though. Speaking of which, Indy came along and kind of stole the focus that should’ve been kept on Jedi. At least, I’ve always thought so.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

With George out of the picture, Lucasfilm really needs to mend fences with Dave Prowse while he’s still around. Forget the past, and start fresh. At least allow him to attend Celebration again. It’s a disservice to the fans that he isn’t there.

This, a lot of this.

Sadly though, I don’t think it’ll happen. Seemingly too many egos at Lucas Film - too many uneasy questions that’ll be asked - and ground retrodden, a still-stubborn Lucas - all which does nothing for the incorrectly accused, and unfairly scapegoated, Dave Prowse.

A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.

Author
Time

His worst decision was not completely breaking Anakin Skywalker.

He should have killed Padme earlier in the third film. He should have kept the children a secret from Anakin. He should have had Padme turn to Obi Wan for help, thus leading Anakin to suspect Padme and Obi Wan were having an affair. Anakin should have been the one following Obi Wan, leading to the duel happening earlier. Anakin in his rage still believes he kills Padme, Obi Wan still cuts Anakin to pieces. Emperor still builds Vader.

Anakin becomes Vader, Obi Wan is off caring for Padme/hiding the twins. She still dies in child birth from the injuries (not broken heart) while Darth Vader returns to Coruscant broken and filed with rage. Under the Emperor’s direction, he begins to wipe out the Jedi.

He had a lot of the right pieces for the PT, he just flubbed the order to put them in. He boxed himself in by wanting the story to be about Anakin, not Vader.

The Jedi are all but extinct.......
Author
Time

I believe the original script had Anakin suspecting a Padme and Obi affair more explicitly. There’s still hints of it in the final film.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

I believe the original script had Anakin suspecting a Padme and Obi affair more explicitly. There’s still hints of it in the final film.

I think you’re right. I feel like it would have made Anakin choking his pregnant wife and trying to kill his best friend make much more sense than standing for ‘security in the new empire’.

The Jedi are all but extinct.......
Author
Time
 (Edited)

Anakin’s story shouldn’t have been a soap opera. It should have been more like Macbeth. He becomes corrupted by power. Instead you can tell Lucas has a perverse understanding of the world, or came to develop one, since he made Anakin’s perceived feebleness his weakness, whereas he should have been undone by his own strength.

The entire prequel trilogy is whiny and childish because it represents a whiny and childish view of the world: that even bad people are good, and there are plenty of excuses that justify or explain their actions. And then comes the Saga, where all you have to do is save your son’s life and you’re suddenly forgiven for all of your sins.

The prequels are an abomination because they are nothing more than a 3-movie long excuse for why a really evil person wasn’t so bad after all.

Author
Time

Alderaan said:

Anakin’s story shouldn’t have been a soap opera. It should have been more like Macbeth. He becomes corrupted by power. Instead you can tell Lucas has a perverse understanding of the world, or came to develop one, since he made Anakin’s perceived feebleness his weakness, whereas he should have been undone by his own strength.

The entire prequel trilogy is whiny and childish because it represents a whiny and childish view of the world: that even bad people are good, and there are plenty of excuses that justify or explain their actions. And then comes the Saga, where all you have to do is save your son’s life and you’re suddenly forgiven for all of your sins.

The prequels are an abomination because they are nothing more than a 3-movie long excuse for why a really evil person wasn’t so bad after all.

Are you lumping ROTJ int the PT? Because otherwise, your view of the character does not fit.

The Jedi are all but extinct.......