logo Sign In

.: The X0 Project Discussion Thread :. (* unfinished project *) — Page 19

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time
Mothr3,

It's natural that it looked better on TV since TV's aren't as high resolution as a monitor. As bad as my project looks, it doesn't look as bad on my TV.

Patrick
"When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk." - Tuco from The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
Author
Time
Yeah, turning the brightness down on your TV is kinda like setting a different blackpoint, but then you lose other detail as well.

http://www.mudgee.net/ot/leiagunner.jpg

More info on the x0project.com site.
Author
Time
Heh, Laserman, you're going to need to use the Cowclops v2 for your screenshot comparisons now.

Dr. M

Author
Time
Sounds fair enough...

<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>

<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>

<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>

Author
Time
I agree...
Once I get a finished cowclops disc in my hands, I will definately be using it for my comparison shots. At this stage though I don't think it is 'out' yet.
Author
Time
^ not sure if it is 'out' - though TR47 has posted that he has received the cowclops v2 set

A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.

Author
Time
It's definitely 'out'. Hurin, what about those official DVD comparisons?
Author
Time
Hey guys, I know we mentioned this a while back, but I wanted to bring it up again to see if anyone can help us out. A couple of us are in need of some extra hard drive space in order to get the video processing underway. We're looking to get two or three 100GB+ drives. If anyone out there lives in North America and could spare to lend us an extra hard drive, please PM me. I'm more than willing to pay for shipping.

My Projects:
[Holiday Special Hybrid DVD v2]
[X0 Project]
[Backstroke of the West DVD]
[ROTS Theatrical DVD]

Author
Time
Well, it may be out, but it aint in my hands yet.

Moth3r, there will be some PAL news soon - what LD player did you use for your capture?

What ever happened to those DVD compares someone was going to post?
Author
Time
Anyone considering helping X0 out with drives should check the sunday flyers. You can frequently find 100+ gig drives for less than $.50 a gig at Best Buy, Circuit City, etc if you're willing to mail in a rebate.

Dr. M

Author
Time
as far as drives go, is there any thing specific you guys need or just any 7200 rpm ide drive fine? any brand preference (i know some people dont 'trust' or like to use certain brands)

Im actually pressed for HD space myself and am looking to get myself a new hd..so 2 possibilities...if i do that i could possibly loan you my 120 gig Western Digital...but i would also be willing to say join up with 2 or 3 other people and chip in for a ~100 gig drive

-Darth Simon
Why Anakin really turned to the dark side:
"Anakin, You're father I am" - Yoda
"No. No. That's not true! That's impossible!" - Anakin

0100111001101001011011100110101001100001

*touchy people disclaimer*
some or all of the above comments are partially exaggerated to convey a point, none of the comments are meant as personal attacks on anyone mentioned or reference in the above post
Author
Time
hi guys if you need hard drives i just got one from DTTechnology.com,it is a 250GB western digital for only $98.00 here are some links to a couple western digital drives.
http://www.dttechnology.com/showproduct.aspx?productid=91
http://www.dttechnology.com/showproduct.aspx?productid=122
hope this helps
darkjedi
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Laserman
Moth3r, there will be some PAL news soon - what LD player did you use for your capture?
I look forward to it. My cap was from a D925.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
Do you still have the 925?
Author
Time
Yes.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
I have a couple of questions.

1.) I was wondering if anyone has used and/or plans to try out AVISynth?

2.) As far as screenshots go, I've noticed that it looks like there are comparisons between the first TR-47 transfer and X0 transfer. In the comparisons, aren't the TR-47 frames taken from a finished DVD and not a raw AVI file? I'm not doubting that the X0 is going to provide the best source, but is it a fair comparison if you compare an uncompressed AVI frame to a compressed MPEG-2 frame? I've read that Cowclops cannot provide an uncompressed frame, but wouldn't it be possible to provide an MPEG-2 compressed X0 frame?


Patrick
"When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk." - Tuco from The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
Author
Time
It is a good point that they aren't *exactly* like for like comparisons, but there is no intention of 'cheating' or anything going on

I haven't finalised the compression rates that we will be using yet, but I have converted my images down to the same colour space, and they are jpeg-ed so what you are seeing isn't exactly the same as the raw images, but very, very close to what will be on the DVD, and in fact the displayed images are lower quality than our hidef conversion.

On the testing I have been doing, the differences are tiny between the encoded images and the 'raw' images, and at this stage it is too much work to encode them into a DVD format and then re-extract the image to do compares. We will throw up that sort of comparison when we are in the encoding phase of the project.

The comparisons are mainly in the area of colour balance, lack of crosstalk induced video noise, and dynamic range, none of which are going to be changed by the encoding process in any real way.
The large differences shown in those compares isn't going to change much just due to an encode (and it will be nothing less than a dual layer encode)

The fine detail may change a little, but in our testing not by much at all.

The images shown so far are far from finished anyway, there is a lot more work ot be done to them, and they will only improve from here. I'd bet my left nut that the images we are showing now will be *worse* than what is on the final discs!

But yeah, it is worth pointing out for anyone who hadn't thought about that part of it.
Author
Time
Oh yeah, I forgot , we are using avisynth extensively.
If you have signed up for the newsletter, and you will see an article using it to do some amazing stuff shortly.
Author
Time
I just signed up for the newsletter.

Is there any way to receive past newsletters, if any?

What’s the internal temperature of a TaunTaun? Luke warm.

Author
Time
You signed up just in time, the first one is almost ready to roll out, so you haven't missed a thing
Author
Time
oh jolly good!

What’s the internal temperature of a TaunTaun? Luke warm.

Author
Time
Thanks for answering my questions in detail Laserman. I like to ask the hard questions to get them out of the way. So when someone else asks, they can be referred back to page so and so.

I have also signed up for the newsletter as I am curious and excited to see how things are progressing.

AVISynth is definitely a program I'm going to have to learn. I know the power of it, I just don't know which of the 1000's of options to use.

Patrick
"When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk." - Tuco from The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
Author
Time
Laserman, MeBeJedi and Zion:

(and let's not forget 'other' )

I just found out about this fan preservation thing, but already I think yours looks the most promising (well, and mverta's for different reasons). I don't have much practical video experience, but if I had the equipment I'm sure I'd be trying something like X0 myself. Until then, I'm glad to offer what little I can to your cause. I don't have any hard drives lying around, I'm afraid, but I've made a small donation through the site. I hope it helps!

A site question (sorry if it's been answered here and I just missed it): Why is there a 'login' form? Or is that just for X0 team members?

Thanks and good luck!
"Silence, fools! Don't you believe in progress?"
Author
Time
I had one other question for the guys. I know you are not at the encoding stage yet, but I know each of you have done other work.

I want to ask which bitrate encoding method gives the best results. Variable or Constant? I ask because that will probably determine which one I go with on my project.

Thanks.

Patrick
"When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk." - Tuco from The Good, The Bad And The Ugly
Author
Time
It depends on the detail in your images.
If the images are on the soft side, and you are going dual layer, then it probably won't make any difference if the bitrates are high enough. Past a certain bitrate you stop getting any improvements at all.
In general, a multi pass variable bitrate is best, just don't set the minimum bitrate too low or your quality might suffer.

The problem really occurs where you have detailed images, or a long movie and are going out single layer. Constant bit rates just can't get high enough for the amount data you want to store *and still fit on the disc*, so if going constant, you get ugly problems. (Basically because you need high bitrates for some scenes to look any good at all, but you don't have the space on the disc to do that)
This is where variable bitrates can help, you save space by having a lower bitrate on the scenes that don't really need a high bitrate, and then can use a higher bitrate for the problem scenes, and still fit it onto your disc. Have too low a bitrate on the easy scenes though and they will get ugly, so it is a balancing act.

At work we run an 8 pass variable bitrate, and then look at any potential problem areas and manually change those.