![](avatars/25884.jpg)
- Time
- Post link
This topic has been locked by a moderator.
NBC is reporting that it’s official: Schneiderman is Mueller’s Plan B for after the Saturday Night Massacre.
Not only will Flynn cooperate with the federal investigators, and testify in federal court if necessary, but he also agreed to cooperate with applicable state and local authorities, as well as testifying in state court cases if necessary.
The federal deals stipulate cooperation with state authorities. Should the federal investigation disappear entirely, the witnesses will need to either cooperate with the state authorities, or else the state authorities will charge the witness with every state charge the feds had threatened them/bargained with in the first place.
So Trump fires Mueller, Flynn is still over a barrel and still cooperates with Schneiderman, who seamlessly picks up where Mueller left off, since many (but not all) of the serious charges exist at a state level (money laundering, kidnapping, conspiracy, obstruction).
The idea being that firing Mueller accomplishes nothing except making Trump look really guilty, and might even pick up an extra obstruction charge in the very unlikely case the House or Senate decide get their own investigations out of neutral. IMO it’s still a matter of when, not if, he’s fired, though. Since when has Trump shied away from doing things that accomplish nothing except making him look really guilty?
The text of that link makes me anxious.
You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)
The text of that link makes me anxious.
Which part? The
utm_content=Main&utm_campaign=SF&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=SocialMarketing#1
part?
I think that’s because I got to the article from a link on Twitter. You can delete that part and it works fine.
http://www.clickhole.com/article/second-chance-amazing-organization-helps-disgraced-7104
But really, the joke is just this;
‘Obama eclipses Trump in most popular Twitter posts of 2017’…
A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…
Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
‘How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com
A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)
… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.
I think the part that makes me nervous is “clickhole.”
I think it’s run by the same people who run The Onion.
Time trolls the Troll-In-Chief.
President Trump claimed in a tweet last month that Time magazine told him he would likely be named Person of the Year. But the magazine’s selection turned out to be, essentially, the opposite of Trump: The women and men speaking out about sexual misconduct.
Time dubbed these people “silence breakers” on a cover unveiled Wednesday, and some attributed their silence breaking to the president.
“I have real doubts about whether we’d be going through this if Hillary Clinton had won, because I think that President Trump’s election, in many ways, was a setback for women,” said NBC’s Megyn Kelly, the former Fox News host who last year accused former Fox chairman Roger Ailes of sexual harassment in a book. She added that “the overall message” of Trump’s victory “was that we don’t really matter.”
If the title is called PERSON of the Year, how can you pick a group of people?
Does it matter?
Does it matter?
Not even a tiny bit.
https://twitter.com/CharlotteAlter/status/938388795342323712
This was conceived, reported and written by women. It was fact-checked by women. The video was shot and edited by women. The layout and photo spread were designed by women. It’s one of the reasons I’m proud to work at @time
It is interesting that she brought up the idea that this may not have happened if Hillary had won. I think that Trump and his crew gaining power might have emboldened people a bit to stop putting up with the shit that Washington, network television, and Hollywood have been allowing to happen for years.
The Person in Question
Does it matter?
Not in the grand scheme of things I suppose. But it just doesn’t make sense.
“The Silence Breakers”(plural) are not a person(singular), they are people(plural).
(No offense intended to those that have/are coming foward and confronting those that sexaully harrassed/assulted them.)
Does it matter?
Not in the grand scheme of things I suppose. But it just doesn’t make sense.
“The Silence Breakers”(plural) are not a person(singular).
ok then
Well its true.
Does it matter?
Not in the grand scheme of things I suppose.
Or any other scheme of things.
If the title is called PERSON (Man) of the Year, how can you pick a group of people (women)?
Incoming Trump tweet.
If the title is called PERSON (Man) of the Year, how can you pick a group of people (women)?
Incoming Trump tweet.
I never said man. Don’t do that. I would have had no problem at all if they had picked a woman.
Does it matter?
Not in the grand scheme of things I suppose.
Or any other scheme of things.
How about the scheme of grammar?
Does it matter?
Not in the grand scheme of things I suppose.
Or any other scheme of things.
How about the scheme of grammar?
Ok, one scheme out of hundreds of thousands. You win.
I’m not trying to win anything.
Trump has declared that the USA will officially recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. He is also going to move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
Deleted.
If the title is called PERSON of the Year, how can you pick a group of people?
Easy to forget Time once picked a silicon based life form.
Where were you in '77?