- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Star Wars - The Edits and DVDr releases thread — Page 11
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Maybe sometime you could just edit the prequels with ALL the footage, not to make the films better but for us to see how misguided Lucas COULD have been.
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Crygor64
I want those Magnolia Fan Edits so freeakin bad it's not funny.
I want those Magnolia Fan Edits so freeakin bad it's not funny.
I got all of the Star Wars DVD's you might ever need
Hit me up for an extensive list.
RiK
“My skill are no longer as Mad as the once were” RiK
- Time
- Post link
The Anamorphic Version has finally found it's REAL NAME
I was reading up over on the www.millenniumfalcon.com message boards and the guy that created them had commented that he did them and he posted them as the Dr. Gonzo Versions.
SO as of today the REAL name of the "Anamorphic Version" is "The Dr. Gonzo Version"
I've updated the above list...........
Word
“My skill are no longer as Mad as the once were” RiK
- Time
- Post link
IF you browse these boards........
I have corrected this error and have now give you your proper credit and I will do my best to post this information everywhere that I come across them!
THANKS so much for creating this Set!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“My skill are no longer as Mad as the once were” RiK
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Great work on the Balance of the Force edit. Why hasn't Lucasfilm hired you yet?? Hehe.
What sort of tweaks are you making to The Clone Wars? I was planning on buying a copy of BOTF and TCW, but would you reocmmend waiting for your extra tweaks or are they just minor things and I should just buy now?
Excellent work. I can't beleve, it makes the prequels NOT suck!
Jar Jar binks - DOESN'T SUCK
Jake Lloyd - DOESN'T SUCK
- Time
- Post link
I would wait for the finished CW.
I fixed an error in the crawl, smoothed several transitions, touched up some saber effects, I'm working on adding one new scene, and there are a few more little things that I am still working on.
- Time
- Post link
A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…
Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
‘How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com
A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)
… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.
- Time
- Post link
Feature an uncompressed PCM copy of the Dolby Prologic II soundtrack from the original Laser Discs. This is the clearest, crispest, nicest sound. No shoddy home-made 5.1 remix or fake DTS. Prologic II is 4-channel surround sound encoded into stereo tracks – so if you have a surround sound decoder and it’s compatible with Prologic II (it would have to be very old not to be, like more than 10 years old) then you will be able to enjoy the surround sound.
The PCM soundtrack on the LD's is not Pro-Logic II encoded! It can be Pro-Logic II decoded with the right equipment. Pro-Logic II was designed to create "5.1" sound from stereo sources, and didn't even exist until a few years ago, well after the last LD was ever pressed.
"The LaserDiscs are not anamorphic, so to make their picture anamorphic you have to add an extra line of resolution every 4 lines, which means interpolation."
That's crap as well. All you have to do is zoom in on the picture in your editing program, much like one would do with a DVD player or a digital TV. No extra lines are being created at all!
If you are going to brag about your DVD's or complain about others, at least educate yourself on the technical aspects before doing so.
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: MoBiUs
ive got the clone wars bootleg and it has die jedi scum on it but..this is a cinema bootleg
ive got the clone wars bootleg and it has die jedi scum on it but..this is a cinema bootleg
Can I get a copy of this from you?
As the Cinema version IS not the same version that's on DVD?
I'll trade you from my Star Wars list
RiK
“My skill are no longer as Mad as the once were” RiK
- Time
- Post link
I'm working on talking hm through ripping the audio for that clip, in case he has a version that has this fabled line...
- Time
- Post link
This is a response to MeBeJedi's post:
The PCM soundtrack on the LD's is not Pro-Logic II encoded! It can be Pro-Logic II decoded with the right equipment. Pro-Logic II was designed to create "5.1" sound from stereo sources, and didn't even exist until a few years ago, well after the last LD was ever pressed.
This is almost correct, but I want to clarify a couple of things.
The PCM soundtracks on the Laserdiscs are encoded with matrixed Dolby Surround information. Dolby Surround is a 3 channel (Left, Right, and a mono Surround track), 1980's version of surround sound. The "surround" track is encoded 90 degrees out of phase with the L and R signals with the intention that the decoder will place this info the in the rear speakers after a few ms of delay.
Dolby Pro-Logic was a (Decode-Only) way to better reproduce the surround environment by 1)extracting center channel info from the L and R signals to be put in a center speaker, and 2) "Logic Steering" a sound source (eg a TIE Fighter) into the corresponding L or R surround speakers for a slightly more realistic effect when going from front-to-back or back-to-front.
Dolby Pro-Logic II is just the current version of Pro-Logic, which takes those same matrix-encoded Dolby Surround stereo tracks, does the math (center channel extraction and more-advanced Logic Steering) and outputs 5.1 discreet channels of audio (L,C,R,LS,RS,LFE). As far as I know, PLII was not intended for Stereo sources, but rather matrix-encoded Dolby Surround sources.
I hope this clarifies rather than confuses!
-Joel
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: Joel
Hi all,
This is a response to MeBeJedi's post:
Dolby Pro-Logic was a (Decode-Only) way to better reproduce the surround environment by 1)extracting center channel info from the L and R signals to be put in a center speaker, and 2) "Logic Steering" a sound source (eg a TIE Fighter) into the corresponding L or R surround speakers for a slightly more realistic effect when going from front-to-back or back-to-front.
-Joel
Hi all,
This is a response to MeBeJedi's post:
Dolby Pro-Logic was a (Decode-Only) way to better reproduce the surround environment by 1)extracting center channel info from the L and R signals to be put in a center speaker, and 2) "Logic Steering" a sound source (eg a TIE Fighter) into the corresponding L or R surround speakers for a slightly more realistic effect when going from front-to-back or back-to-front.
-Joel
Original Prologic had mono surround (no rear steering)
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: eros
Original Prologic had mono surround (no rear steering)
Originally posted by: Joel
Hi all,
This is a response to MeBeJedi's post:
Dolby Pro-Logic was a (Decode-Only) way to better reproduce the surround environment by 1)extracting center channel info from the L and R signals to be put in a center speaker, and 2) "Logic Steering" a sound source (eg a TIE Fighter) into the corresponding L or R surround speakers for a slightly more realistic effect when going from front-to-back or back-to-front.
-Joel
Hi all,
This is a response to MeBeJedi's post:
Dolby Pro-Logic was a (Decode-Only) way to better reproduce the surround environment by 1)extracting center channel info from the L and R signals to be put in a center speaker, and 2) "Logic Steering" a sound source (eg a TIE Fighter) into the corresponding L or R surround speakers for a slightly more realistic effect when going from front-to-back or back-to-front.
-Joel
Original Prologic had mono surround (no rear steering)
ON THE MONEY!
I love these boards and the neat things we share and also learn/teach each other
“My skill are no longer as Mad as the once were” RiK
- Time
- Post link
Actually, I was entirely correct. I simply didn't go into the actual encoding process.
"Original Prologic had mono surround (no rear steering)"
Exactly, which is why PL-II was created.
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>
- Time
- Post link
Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
"This is almost correct, but I want to clarify a couple of things."
Actually, I was entirely correct. I simply didn't go into the actual encoding process.
"Original Prologic had mono surround (no rear steering)"
Exactly, which is why PL-II was created.
"This is almost correct, but I want to clarify a couple of things."
Actually, I was entirely correct. I simply didn't go into the actual encoding process.
"Original Prologic had mono surround (no rear steering)"
Exactly, which is why PL-II was created.
YES!!!!!!!!
IF the true PCM was captured based on his software ~> MeBeJedi SHOULD have been able to extract the MATRIXED mono surround track. Once this is done it's a simple process to have the software then output a TRUE unaltered Dolby PL-II version of the original PCM mono surround signal all he has done is DUPLICATE the exsisting mono track. SO we will be getting the same audio as the PCM just slight tweeked
“My skill are no longer as Mad as the once were” RiK
- Time
- Post link
I even have an optical cable running between my LD player and my computer. In fact, one of the main reasons why I bought this Soyo motherboard (I put my own computer together) was because it had built-in digital/optical 5.1 recording capablities. Of course, Rikter shall be finding this out pretty soon......
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>
- Time
- Post link
Original Prologic had mono surround (no rear steering)
Ummm.... No steering between lr and rr maybe, but steering from front to back, back to front, that was the point of "logic steering."
From "gizmohighway.com"
With the addition of the Centre channel, the distribution of sound elements becomes clearer In addition, by installing the adaptive matrix circuit into the playback side, Pro Logic emphasises the sound directions.
Ummm.... No steering between lr and rr maybe, but steering from front to back, back to front, that was the point of "logic steering."
From "gizmohighway.com"
With the addition of the Centre channel, the distribution of sound elements becomes clearer In addition, by installing the adaptive matrix circuit into the playback side, Pro Logic emphasises the sound directions.
I agree that the surround track was still mono, though.
..but I was incorrect about Pro-Logic II. According to the Dolby website, Pro-Logic II *IS* intended for regular ol' stereo.
BTW, hi everyone. In no way was I trying to insult anyone, or ruffle feathers, or anything like that. I'm a recording engineer and audiophile, and I was attempting to offer some insight.
Anxiously awaiting the Magnolia Fan DVDs myself,
Joel
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
None taken. We're just having fun here.
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>
<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>