logo Sign In

Daredevil Director's Cut

Author
Time
I admit I watched it, even though the theatrical cut wasn't very good. The director cut is a little better, with more emphasis on Matt Murdock's lawyer work, but still not very good, still too much an unsuccesful attempt to blend Spider-Man with Batman. Anyone else bother with it?
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an Obi-Wan to go.

Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v72/greencapt/hansolovsindy.jpg
Author
Time
i personally liked daredevil, sure the villians sucked but everything else in the movie i thought was good.
Author
Time
I liked how balls-out violent it was. It was a decent flick, which is about all I can say for every Marvel comic book movie.

I used to be very active on this forum. I’m not really anymore. Sometimes, people still want to get in touch with me about something, and that is great! If that describes you, please email me at [my username]ATgmailDOTcom.

Hi everybody. You’re all awesome. Keep up the good work.

Author
Time
I actually liked the Theatrical cut of Daredevil,that said though it wasnt the greatest comic book adaption or film I had ever seen but I enjoyed for what it was, I thought the Directors Cut was better than the Theatrical Cut and added more to the film, though again it doesnt it make the greastest comic book adaption............
Author
Time
Originally posted by: ReverendBeastly
I liked how balls-out violent it was. It was a decent flick, which is about all I can say for every Marvel comic book movie.


Most of the balls-out violence was lost in a stream of bad editing.
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an Obi-Wan to go.

Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v72/greencapt/hansolovsindy.jpg
Author
Time
Wasting a couple of hours and few £s in the cinema on a very forgettable fimlm - and then they'd like us to part with more time and cash for a Director's Cut?

Enough of this crap. No more double dipping or whatever the term is.

A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com - includes info on how to ask for a fan project and how to search for projects and threads on OT•com.

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

Take your time to look around this site before posting… Do NOT just lazily make yet another ‘link request’ post - or a new thread asking for projects.

Author
Time
Originally posted by: oojason
Wasting a couple of hours and few £s in the cinema on a very forgettable fimlm - and then they'd like us to part with more time and cash for a Director's Cut?

Enough of this crap. No more double dipping or whatever the term is.

You make a good point, actually. I'm pretty sure "double dipping" is the correct term as given to us by Seinfeld.

I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an Obi-Wan to go.

Red heads ROCK. Blondes do not rock. Nuff said.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v72/greencapt/hansolovsindy.jpg