Ehm, Star Trek anybody?
What are your favorite parts of the TNG classic, “Shades of Grey”?
The Person in Question
Ehm, Star Trek anybody?
What are your favorite parts of the TNG classic, “Shades of Grey”?
The part where Riker is lying on his bed. I always wanted a job where I could spend my workday in bed.
I also like that part. Such a great close to a great season.
The Person in Question
Loved how Riker’s flashbacks contained cutaways he couldn’t possibly have seen!
This must have been the easiest episode to remaster in HD, for obvious reasons. 😉
Where were you in '77?
Loved how Riker’s flashbacks contained cutaways he couldn’t possibly have seen!
This must have been the easiest episode to remaster in HD, for obvious reasons. 😉
Speaking of reused footage, do you think they remastered the theme song in every single episode? Or did they just restore one from each version of the theme and use it for the relevant episodes?
The Person in Question
Lol
I don’t see anything funny.
The post right before his was kind of funny.
The Person in Question
I was knocking this up as a better quality example / suggestion etc for you Warbler:-
and have seen you have totally removed your sig (which I hope you change your mind on, and also re-read the posts made about your signature as to what has actually been said to you) - as well as just having seeing Wook’s cool sig for you above too.
I see nothing funny here.
I’ll think about it.
Or here
time loops are so predictable
I’ll think about it.
Or here
That’s what I was talking about.
The Person in Question
Again, I see nothing funny about it.
This is tiresome.
I strongly suggest people pack it in with the attitude, pack it in with the lols and sighs posts etc - and get back on topic.
A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…
Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
‘How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com
A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)
… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.
Ehm, Star Trek anybody?
What are your favorite parts of the TNG classic, “Shades of Grey”?
The end titles appearing mate, the end titles.
A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…
Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
‘How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com
A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)
… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.
Ehm, Star Trek anybody?
What are your favorite parts of the TNG classic, “Shades of Grey”?
The end titles appearing mate, the end titles.
Sometimes I expect the end titles to just be a flashback of other episodes’ end titles, and it goes on for an hour.
The Person in Question
Ehm, Star Trek anybody?
What are your favorite parts of the TNG classic, “Shades of Grey”?
The end titles appearing mate, the end titles.
Sometimes I expect the end titles to just be a flashback of other episodes’ end titles, and it goes on for an hour.
😃
That’d still be more preferable to watch than the Threshold episode from Voyager - which would also be infinitely better if it just showed the titles.
Thankfully there’s a fair few quality episodes out there too 😃
A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…
Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
‘How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com
A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)
… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.
Welp, looks like Discovery has been “borrowing” from an indie adventure game:
Star Trek Discovery & Tardigrades
edit. deleted. I should have read oojason’s post more carefully. I do think he edited it more than once. But I am sorry.
Are you trying to get banned again? Why would you immediately do what the moderator that banned you last time explicitly said not to do?
Welp, looks like Discovery has been “borrowing” from an indie adventure game:
Star Trek Discovery & Tardigrades
‘oh my’. and they just got renewed.
Are you trying to get banned again? Why would you immediately do what the moderator that banned you last time explicitly said not to do?
I thought his first banning was pretty ridiculous but his behavior recently is more deserving.
Not deserving, but more deserving. Two mods ask you to shorten your sig and instead you just throw a hissy fit and delete the whole thing and then act like you’re being oppressed about it even though nobody even suggested you delete it.
On topic, I enjoyed voyager quite a bit but “Threshold” was laughably bad.
Are you trying to get banned again? Why would you immediately do what the moderator that banned you last time explicitly said not to do?
I thought his first banning was pretty ridiculous but his behavior recently is more deserving.
Not deserving, but more deserving. Two mods ask you to shorten your sig and instead you just throw a hissy fit and delete the whole thing and then act like you’re being oppressed about it even though nobody even suggested you delete it.
He also replied to a post that said “no more sighs” with a sigh.
Come on warb.
The established canon for the Kelvin “timeline” is that it is in fact actually an entirely different alternate reality:
That is not the way it appears in Star Trek 2009.
That is exactly how it appeared and was intended to appear.
That is not the meaning I got out of Star Trek 2009.
Just because you did not interpret the intended meaning, that doesn’t mean it only means what your interpretation was. You do not seem to leave any room for the possibility that your interpretation of canon may be wrong; and because canon is apparently so important to you, you argue why it must be what you say that it is.
Now, you can have a headcanon where, to you, Star Trek Prime does not exist. But what you are doing here now is arguing what the official is, in which case your interpretation doesn’t matter, but rather those of the creators of Star Trek. You have been given a boatload of evidence to support that the Prime Universe still exists despite the events of Star Trek '09.
What matters is whether the official canon matters to you (“you” meaning the individual viewer, not just you Warbler). If the official canon matters, then you must seek out the official intent of the canon. If it does not, then you can believe what you want. Regardless, your opinion regarding whether official canon must be observed does not impede me from having a different opinion. As it stands, my headcanon says Discovery is not part of the Trek Prime Universe; and Padme Amidala does not die during Revenge of the Sith.
Again, official canon regarding fiction is not Truth. It is not absolute. And besides that, my understanding of the Truth of my faith is that nitpicking the details in even that regard is missing the point (the point being fostering the relationship, not the adherence to rules.) So either way, your want to enforce your own interpretation on others is unfounded.
tl;dr: Stop arguing about why your interpretation of official canon is valid. If official canon matters, then correct interpretation is not up to you. If it doesn’t, then it is only up to you for your own sake and not for ours. You can’t say Prime doesn’t exist and both use official canon to argue your point, while using your point to argue official canon.
chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.
The established canon for the Kelvin “timeline” is that it is in fact actually an entirely different alternate reality:
That is not the way it appears in Star Trek 2009.
That is exactly how it appeared and was intended to appear.
That is not the meaning I got out of Star Trek 2009.
Just because you did not interpret the intended meaning, that doesn’t mean it only means what your interpretation was. You do not seem to leave any room for the possibility that your interpretation of canon may be wrong; and because canon is apparently so important to you, you argue why it must be what you say that it is.
Now, you can have a headcanon where, to you, Star Trek Prime does not exist. But what you are doing here now is arguing what the official is, in which case your interpretation doesn’t matter, but rather those of the creators of Star Trek. You have been given a boatload of evidence to support that the Prime Universe still exists despite the events of Star Trek '09.
What matters is whether the official canon matters to you (“you” meaning the individual viewer, not just you Warbler). If the official canon matters, then you must seek out the official intent of the canon. If it does not, then you can believe what you want. Regardless, your opinion regarding whether official canon must be observed does not impede me from having a different opinion. As it stands, my headcanon says Discovery is not part of the Trek Prime Universe; and Padme Amidala does not die during Revenge of the Sith.
Again, official canon regarding fiction is not Truth. It is not absolute. And besides that, my understanding of the Truth of my faith is that nitpicking the details in even that regard is missing the point (the point being fostering the relationship, not the adherence to rules.) So either way, your want to enforce your own interpretation on others is unfounded.
tl;dr: Stop arguing about why your interpretation of official canon is valid. If official canon matters, then correct interpretation is not up to you. If it doesn’t, then it is only up to you for your own sake and not for ours. You can’t say Prime doesn’t exist and both use official canon to argue your point, while using your point to argue official canon.
I tried to stop arguing the point multiple times. I will try again.
Are you trying to get banned again? Why would you immediately do what the moderator that banned you last time explicitly said not to do?
I thought his first banning was pretty ridiculous but his behavior recently is more deserving.
Not deserving, but more deserving. Two mods ask you to shorten your sig and instead you just throw a hissy fit and delete the whole thing and then act like you’re being oppressed about it even though nobody even suggested you delete it.
He also replied to a post that said “no more sighs” with a sigh.
Come on warb.
I didn’t read the post carefully enough and missed the “no more sighs” part. I am sorry.
But I do hope it is not any order for all the threads. The “*sigh*” is kinda my thing. I do hope I don’t have to stop entirely.
In any event. To calm things down. I won’t post in this thread for awhile.
