logo Sign In

Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 296

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time

Theresa May and the Holy Grail…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qOyT3ZkUxI

A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

oojason said:

Theresa May and the Holy Grail…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qOyT3ZkUxI

At least the Brits are still able to criticize their leaders without punishment. In the US you could go to prison for a year just smirking at Jeff Sessions.

Don’t you believe it. These days, you get arrested and thrown in jail if you say you’re English don’t you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkCBhKs4faI

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/us/politics/senate-health-care-bill-republican.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

It’s one million less… yay?

The Senate bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act would increase the number of people without health insurance by 22 million by 2026, a figure that is only slightly lower than the 23 million more uninsured that the House version would create, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Monday.

Next year, 15 million more people would be uninsured compared with current law, the budget office said.

The legislation would decrease federal deficits by a total of $321 billion over a decade, the budget office said.

(To be clear… nay.)

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Well, not to sound like a certain someone here, but if Kennedy retires…we’re fucked.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_breakfast_table/features/2017/supreme_court_june_2017/neil_gorsuch_is_everything_liberals_feared_and_more.html

We are fucked, because the Supreme Court is the last word on all laws, which are impossible to change. I have been predicting SCOTUS is going to set this country back decades, yet whenever I speak my mind on this site, I’m ignored and threatened with being banned.

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

yet whenever I speak my mind on this site, I’m ignored and threatened with being banned.

Nope. Never happened.

Author
Time

We technically have zero mechanisms preventing the Supreme Court from trampling over human rights in this country. That’s dangerous if we were to have a permanent 5-4 majority that could uphold laws for 30, maybe even 40 years; and be used by GOP to help tyrannize minority groups for half a century, which is simply not acceptable.

Author
Time

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/california-democratic-speaker-killed-his-own-partys-plan-for-single-payer-healthcare/

I really hope this smug prick gets voted out of office come the next election.

http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/democrats-help-corporate-donors-block-california-health-care-measure-progressives

Since 2012, Rendon has taken in more than $82,000 from business groups and healthcare corporations that are listed in state documents opposed the measure, according to an International Business Times review of data amassed by the National Institute on Money In State Politics. In all, he has received more than $101,000 from pharmaceutical companies and another $50,000 from major health insurers.

In the same time, the California Democratic Party has received more than $1.2 million from the specific groups opposing the bill, and more than $2.2 million from pharmaceutical and health insurance industry donors. That includes a $100,000 infusion of cash from Blue Shield of California in the waning days of the 2016 election — just before state records show the insurer began lobbying against the single-payer bill.

Hahaha! Color me shocked!

Author
Time

Damn. Blue shield happens to be my insurance provider right now.

Author
Time

Well gee, it turns out that I know more about the Senate healthcare bill than the lazy dumbass president some people elected.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-healthcare-senate-brca-2017-6

According to The Times’ Glenn Thrush and Jonathan Martin, Trump has been “on the sidelines” during the Senate negotiations.

In fact, one Republican senator in favor of the BCRA told The Times that the president “did not have a grasp of some basic elements of the Senate plan” during a meeting with all of the GOP members on Tuesday. The senator also said Trump was confused when a moderate expressed concern that the bill would be seen as a tax break for the rich.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Well gee, it turns out that I know more about the Senate healthcare bill than the lazy dumbass president some people elected.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-healthcare-senate-brca-2017-6

According to The Times’ Glenn Thrush and Jonathan Martin, Trump has been “on the sidelines” during the Senate negotiations.

In fact, one Republican senator in favor of the BCRA told The Times that the president “did not have a grasp of some basic elements of the Senate plan” during a meeting with all of the GOP members on Tuesday. The senator also said Trump was confused when a moderate expressed concern that the bill would be seen as a tax break for the rich.

yeah, but trump was probably confused before and after as well.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

chyron8472 said:

CatBus said:

Accurate terminology is important–for example, calling everyone under the LGBTQIA umbrella “gay” would be pretty dismissive/marginalizing to those who aren’t gay.

I disagree. Language is fluid and words mean what society wants them to mean. If a society wants to change a word’s meaning, then it changes. There can be an “umbrella” word to encompass the whole umbrella without having to explicitly enumerate each individual sect within it. Other minority groups in society don’t have to do this. I mean, what if the Native American tribes wanted to be known under the umbrella of combining the first letter of every tribe? The term “Native American” does not inherently marginalize the Cherokee or the Osage tribes.

I’m sorry, but I really feel that to be offended or feel marginalized simply because a community’s acronym doesn’t explicitly include one’s flavor of eccentricity–that, to me really is indicative of one who is highly-oversensitive.

Do you still use dated words for people of color? Those 19th century terms might not be acceptable in today’s society.

But, there is a practical limit to all of this. If I came across someone who is black, and I referred to them as black, and they got offended because they are lighter skinned, and I referred to them as mixed, and they got offended, and I asked them politely how would they like to be called? And they said, please call me black, but not black all the way, because I’m mixed, with 10% white and 20% latino and 60% African American, and 10% is debatable…well I’m not going to accommodate them, sorry.

LBGT-Q is the farthest I will go. Love all you people though, but I have to draw the line somewhere.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Well gee, it turns out that I know more about the Senate healthcare bill than the lazy dumbass president some people elected.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-healthcare-senate-brca-2017-6

According to The Times’ Glenn Thrush and Jonathan Martin, Trump has been “on the sidelines” during the Senate negotiations.

In fact, one Republican senator in favor of the BCRA told The Times that the president “did not have a grasp of some basic elements of the Senate plan” during a meeting with all of the GOP members on Tuesday. The senator also said Trump was confused when a moderate expressed concern that the bill would be seen as a tax break for the rich.

yeah, but trump was probably confused before and after as well.

Probably?

Author
Time

Alderaan said:

LBGT-Q is the farthest I will go.

All that monologue just to get the acronym mixed up anyway.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

I am posting the fox article because.

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/06/28/president-trump-attacks-amazon-on-twitter-says-it-doesnt-pay-internet-taxes.html

Last night I thought it would be fun to compare what CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News were all showing at a random time (I think roughly 10pm hour EST).

MSNBC - Healthcare bill stalling.
CNN - Healthcare bill stalling.
Fox News - Clinton and Obama colluding with Russia and against Bernie.

Author
Time

Handman said:

Alderaan said:

LBGT-Q is the farthest I will go.

All that monologue just to get the acronym mixed up anyway.

Everyone knows gays are more important than bisexuals. 😉

Author
Time

Handman said:

Alderaan said:

LBGT-Q is the farthest I will go.

All that monologue just to get the acronym mixed up anyway.

My MGB-GT, she’s a runner now.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)