logo Sign In

The Random Star Wars Pics & GIFs Thread — Page 98

Author
Time

LEGO has that in the pipeline, or is someone really good at making ships based on scant shots from the teaser?
This could be a tad spoilerish for some. 😉

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

LEGO has that in the pipeline, or is someone really good at making ships based on scant shots from the teaser?

The latter, actually.

This could be a tad spoilerish for some. 😉

Got it. I was too lazy to move it to another thread so I double-quote-boxed it. If that is insufficient, let me know and I’ll move it.

.

Author
Time

from - https://www.artstation.com/artwork/ZDrzN - and can also see the how picture is made/evolved…

A little patience goes a long way on this old-school Rebel base. If you are having issues finding what you are looking for, these will be of some help…

Welcome to the OriginalTrilogy.com | Introduce yourself in here | Useful info within : About : Help : Site Rules : Fan Project Rules : Announcements
How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com; some info & answers + FAQs - includes info on how to search for projects and threads on the OT•com

A Project Index for Star Wars Preservations (Harmy’s Despecialized & 4K77/80/83 etc) : A Project Index for Star Wars Fan Edits (adywan & Hal 9000 etc)

… and take your time to look around this site before posting - to get a feel for this place. Don’t just lazily make yet another thread asking for projects.

Author
Time

The dumb thing is that you could make this somewhat funny if you ditched the misogyny. The last 3 panels are Anakin joke, Luke joke, Rey joke, and the last one could have been something about being self-trained. Bringing gender into it is unnecessary and basically makes it a non-joke.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Gotta love misogyny, amirite?

It’s not “misogyny” to deride transparently “reaction-formation,” self-conscious, meticulously P.C., desperate, strained, committee-censored shit writing.

Author
Time

It’s misogyny to add the “female” part, which is completely irrelevant…and was already explained. But thanks for stopping by!

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

It’s misogyny to add the “female” part, which is completely irrelevant…and was already explained. But thanks for stopping by!

No, the compulsory female aspect is completely relevant because that’s exactly what makes it forced, painfully obvious PC reaction formation.

You’re Welcome!!

Author
Time

The film could have just as easily featured a young man with prodigious force powers - they decided to make the character female.

The film could have just as easily featured an extended apprenticeship for Rey - they decided to give her prodigious force powers.

These decisions are unrelated, and attempts to conflate them just expose how hard it is for you to deal with the first one.

Author
Time

Darth Id said:

TV’s Frink said:

It’s misogyny to add the “female” part, which is completely irrelevant…and was already explained. But thanks for stopping by!

No, the compulsory female aspect is completely relevant because that’s exactly what makes it forced, painfully obvious PC reaction formation.

I always knew your face tattoos (on your face!) were an attempt to compensate for some shortcoming, but now I know specifically what that shortcoming is.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

It’s absurdist, lets not take this too seriously. It’s very possible to enjoy a joke ironically or to laugh at how, as Darth Id put it, it’s “forced, painfully obvious PC reaction formation” - which obviously some don’t find very funny.

EDIT: I totally misunderstood Darth Id, I meant the meme, if serious which I’m sure it is not, is a hilarious overreaction to Rey’s character.

Complete Star Wars Poster Collection

Author
Time

Jonno said:

The film could have just as easily featured a young man with prodigious force powers - they decided to make the character female.

The film could have just as easily featured an extended apprenticeship for Rey - they decided to give her prodigious force powers.

These decisions are unrelated…

See, but they’re not.
The writers felt the need to make their heroine omnipotent because she’s a she, as part of the concerted effort on Disney’s part to gin up Mary Sue protagonists specifically for the social engineering goal of transforming girls into the same revenue streams that boys have been to date.
[Example: I have it on extremely good authority that in the forthcoming Duck Tales reboot, formerly minor mascot Webigail is going to be not only the primary protagonist, but a quintessential Mary Sue, besting the triplets at everything from sports to adventuring to aviation to gadgeteering to schoolwork.]

TV’s Frink said:

I always knew your face tattoos (on your face!) were an attempt to compensate for some shortcoming, but now I know specifically what that shortcoming is.

Yeah, a lack of patience for willfully blind dullards like you.

Author
Time

Enough already! Take it to off topic if you have an axe to grind.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Not going to tell you again.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?