This user has been banned.
Now that blu prices (both players and discs) are approaching "normal" levels (i.e. what DVDs were back in their heyday), and since all blu-players can play DVDs, there won't be any reason not to upgrade when your current player craps out.
BarBar Jinkx said:
Shouldn't that be for Spielberg seeing as though he can make movies that don't rely so heavily on them
I was just making a joke when I said you voted for Lucas, since you didn't actually name anyone :-)
Thank you BarBar - one vote for Lucas is recorded.
Ok ABC, you win. I can't force you to remove the picture. And since I see you've now put me on ignore, and I can't PM you either, you probably won't even read this.
But consider...in your ESB music thread, you have asked dark_jedi to respect you and to respect your thread. I am asking you to respect me and my thread - how is this any different?
I have enjoyed your posts on many different occasions, including most of your posts in this thread. I have enjoyed your journeys from PROBATION to HALL OF SHAME to PURGATORY to FULL PARDON. But now you've decided to just be a pain in my ass. I'm not exactly sure why.
Your picture violates the OT.com guidelines. Continuing to leave it posted when I have specifically asked you to take it down shows a great deal of disrespect to me and anyone else who does not want NSFW pictures in this thread or on this forum.
I'll ask one more time - please take down the picture. I'll be asking Moth3r to do it for you next.
doubleofive said:
Although I do think the comparison is a bit unfair. I mean, Spielberg has made a lot of movies that don't have visual effects at all or a minimal amount, while all we can compare them to on Lucas' side are the SEs and Prequels.
Argument rejected!
Look, fair or unfair does not have anything to do with it. This is a competition between two men. All that matters is which one is better, whatever the reason. For example, is it fair that Spielberg was born with a natural ability to act? Is it fair that Lucas was blessed with a better beard (barely)? And yet, these are indisputable truths.
Further, you can argue that Spielberg's decision NOT to use CGI, or make movies that barely require it, means that he is making better use of the technology. Maybe if Lucas wasn't so Lazy between 1983 and 1999 he could have made some movies that didn't need so much CGI.
In summation, Spielberg takes the lead. Who else has an opinion?
Wait, did you just call me negative1? I demand
an immediate apology because I feel
that you have besmirched my good
name with your categorization of me
when you don't even know me.
Immediate apology, I say.
Later
-1
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
You sound like an employee of xhonzicorp...
BURN HIM!!!
80's era MTV. Actual music videos? What a concept.
Also, late 80's MTV show Remote Control.
Cheap Seats. Two guys making fun of sports MST3K style.
Come to think of it - MST3K. I know there is now The Film crew, Riff Trax, and Cinema Titanic. But still.
TV's Frink, Springfield Shopper.
What's with the yellow clone troopers?
I've seen that pic before, but I always get a kick out of it.
Welcome to the continuing series of threads, Lucas v. Spielberg. We will be debating all facets of their lives, in order to determine once in for all who is the better man. This is Round 3.
Previous results:
Round 1 - http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Lucas-v-Spielberg-Round-1-Who-Is-The-Better-Actor/topic/11181/ - Winner - SPIELBERG
Roung 2 - http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Lucas-v-Spielberg-Round-2-Who-Has-The-Better-Facial-Hair/topic/11200/ - Winner - LUCAS
Current Score: LUCAS 1, SPIELBERG 1
Now, on to Round 3: Who makes better use of CGI?
Winner: Lucas, by a whisker!
Monroville said:
(4) overall, at least for me, I would give both about a good 7-8/10.
Wait, did you just give each a -1/10? ;-)
And an excellent suggestion it is.
Darth Solo said:
Yeah, eveyfink seems to lead me to fanedit.org, I'll stick with the mess in my sig.
?
That had nothing to do with fanedit.org. Let me try again...
Use this:
{url=http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Darth-Solos-movie-i-seen-last-night-opinion-be-it-an-old-or-new-filum/post/395740/#TopicPost395740}Darth Solo's movie i seen last night opinion, be it an old or new filum{/url}
except replace the { and } with [ and ]
Use this format:
{url=http://fanedits.com/}FanEdits.com{/url}
Replace all the { and } with [ and ]
Look I have decided to cancel making this. Sorry.
Changes are afoot...
Nanner is transferred to PURGATORY. This may result in a scary picture of a disapproving Tommy Lee Jones, but I'll take my chances.
ABC is transferred to a new level of punishment. Please see new Rule #17.
ABC still refuses to remove the offending picture. This may not end well.
And since the Neil Diamond parade has slowed a bit...
THE THREAD IS NOW OPEN!!!
I didn't really think you were a hot woman, or a woman at all. But you have to admit, your avatar does look a bit like an egg surrounded by a bunch of sperm...
vote_for_palpatine said:
Anyway, where the hell did my topic go? Does this happen to every thread here? I don't feel like researching the matter, so someone give me the Cliff's Notes version.
Yes. But don't try and take the test with that information. It's not in-depth enough.
Well, technically you said "before V" which implies you didn't like V or anything after, including VI.
Darth Solo said:
Frink my sigs a mess, how do u link a thread to a sig as clean and tidy as you have????
Look here for help:
Octorox said:
TV's Frink said:
Octorox:
I just don't see it!
Don't see what? It's the attack on the Death Star
No no no. Everyone seems to think you're a hot woman, but I just don't see it.
xhonzi said:
xhonzicorp has you right where it wants you.
Now you've done it...
xhonzicorp(tm) is a registered trademark of Frink Enterprises(tm). I'm going to sue you, take over your thread, and reopen it to give the people what they so richly deserve.
At any rate, I miss Golden Saute. We ate it in college because we were to poor to afford Pasta Roni.
Ziz said:
Leave your computer running JDownloader overnight, maybe even for a whole day or so non-stop. RapidShare has been adjusting their bandwidth availability for different points in the day and night, so leaving JDownloader running overnight will allow it to keep recycling thru the files it skipped until it gets them all.
I touched on this previously, but Ziz has got it exactly right. Nighttime (USA) access on free RS is pretty easy, but the daytime access is extremely limited. You can let jdownloader go as long as you want to leave your computer on and you'll get all the files eventually...
...or pay for Premium RS.
Sorceror said:
This is why torrents are better than Crapidshare.
Hahahahaha. I see what you did there.
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Thread-for-all-Usenet-vs-Torrent-vs-Rapidshare-discussion/topic/10677/
What do you mean "crashed?" What happened exactly?
