- Time
- Post link
Respectfully, Vladius, that definitely was intentional. Both George Lucas and Dave Filoni have said in interviews that the Jedi dogma seen in the Prequels was deliberately intended to be taken as a negative, and a factor in Anakin’s, the Galaxy’s, and the Jedi’s fall. (Whether or not that idea successfully landed for audiences is up for debate.) Dave’s explicitly said something along the lines of “that’s why they live in a literal ivory tower”. And the elements of TLJ where Luke criticises the dogmatic past of the Jedi order were apparently a feature of George’s original ideas for the sequel trilogy which he sold to Disney.
That said, whether or not we choose to emphasise or retain those intentions in a fan edit is of course entirely up to the editors.
I’m not posting that for conflict, just for information.
Speculating now, I think he intended that Qui-Gon was supposed to represent the first challenge to that dogma (hence his lower standing in the order), Yoda to represent entrenched dogma fading as he realises its flaws near the end of the Clone Wars, Obi-Wan’s and Yoda’s meditations (in life and as force spirits) to represent their coming to understand an alternative existence within the light side of the force, and Luke as the intended inheritor of the new order.
Anakin would have been the first inheritor of the new Jedi if Qui-Gon hadn’t been killed, causing the tragic cascade that led to Vader, delaying the light’s revival. Luke was the new hope, delayed in his path by the presence of Vader. After Return of the Jedi, Luke sought to rebuild the order - already a better one based on the limited information he had, and under the guidance of the force spirits - but in his attempt to rebuild what was lost he still incorporated some of the old dogma, as we’ve seen recently. The tragedy he caused his own family with Kylo Ren and the failiure of his new/rebuilt order sent him, like Yoda and Obi-Wan, into doubt and exile, before the discovery of Rey (and his reconnection with Yoda) helped her forge what will follow.
The only force spirits we’ve seen have been those Jedi that challenged or questioned the order’s dogma, which seems deliberate. (And, for me, makes the final moments of Rise of Skywalker Ascendent all the more powerful, continuing that thread into Rey.)
Can you point me to those Lucas interviews? I’m still skeptical of that. I don’t think it landed for audiences at all until people came in after the fact to be contrarian and say that the prequels were underrated (“secretly genius”), and Filoni is a good example of that.
People are going to do the same post-facto rehabilitation of the sequels and have already started.
Like I said, I think his personal religious and political philosophy includes those Buddhist and ascetic elements and he felt that those were genuinely good things for the Jedi. He’s also said that attachment, fear of loss, and pleasure-seeking are what can lead you down to evil and that that’s what happened to Anakin.
It’s also unclear what people mean by dogmatism. Do they mean that instead of “no attachment” there should be “some attachment but not too much?” Or do they mean no rules on attachment at all?
In any case, whether it was Lucas’s idea or not, I just find the new Jedi he made incredibly uninteresting and completely different from what we saw in the original trilogy and all the material before the prequels, which Lucas also signed off on.
