logo Sign In

Lord Grievous

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Jan-2010
Last activity
14-Jan-2022
Posts
191

Post History

Post
#456790
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

vaderios said:

Ady I think (not sure) you mentioned that you will reuse the same shot that piet says "yes my lord" in the tractor beam shot because when Piet says for the first time Yes my lord its from an other shot and the officers and the BG is not match.

So i have to ask if this is true. Logically you will replace the background from vader too in the close ups because its the same/flipped from the hoth scenes

 

Also when piet later says "alert all commands" will you replace its BG to be next to vader because he clearly talking to the crew in the pit of the bridge?

 

Its pitty tho that the officers are from needa's SD. i remember 005 brillianty discovered the patterns of the pits between the SDs and the Executor.

What are your plans about shot reuses and BG replacements?

 

-Angel

Which leads me to this shot:

Is this amalgamation still in ESB:R?

Post
#455955
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

asterisk8 said:

Lord Grievous, you realize that rebel is not under the ship, right? He's nowhere near it.

Yes I know he's not actually under the ship, but in order to clarify which of the many rebel pilots from that screenshot I was talking about I was being more literal than is appropriate :)

Post
#455893
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Personally I think that moving the transports a bit further back, enough so the rebel pilot's head doesn't touch the underside of the ship, would make it appear more realistic in terms of scale.

I don't think that at that distance you could really make out individual people under the ship.

 

EDIT: will we still see some X-Wings fly overhead? Possible out of the hangar?

Post
#448022
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

No they're not, the Bespin escape clip for instance is a 720p TS stream with no black bars and it plays perfectly on my widescreen monitor. I've noticed that some of the Facebook clips are stretched, but I think that's because of some other reason. If you play a 720p or 1080p clip with no black bars on a widescreen monitor it will create the bars itself.

But if the bars are already part of the image it will still create them and thus you have two sets of black bars surrounding your image, which makes the image look even smaller.

Post
#448020
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Ady, when you release the ESB:R AVCHD, will it already have those black matte bars in the image? I hope not because all it does it make the actual image smaller. Some of the clips you've released have it (like the ESB:R trailer) while others don't (like the Bespin escape).

Post
#441971
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Ripplin said:

Looking at it alongside that scan, it really makes the scale seem waaaaaaaaaaay off. :p

I was just thinking the same thing. If that's a transport ship it couldn't carry more than your average shopping trolly :)

Hopefully Adywan will fix the scale in this scene.

Post
#440793
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

adywan said:

vaderios said:

adywan said:

I still prefer the idea that it's a forming star.

Thats the problem when similar things are lookalike.

dont forget the sunrise sunset debate ;)

 

-Angel

But isn't that the whole point of what makes a good movie. It enables the audience to interpret things their own way instead of having everything spelled out for them (like the bloody PT)

I'm not going to be changing the way it looks. I've loved that star ever since 1980. Some things just don't need to be changed.

Plus, it puts the star back in Star Wars :)

Post
#439446
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

adywan said:

Ganamae said:

Jaitea said:

No but seriously, I don't think a large Lambda shuttle would be used by a mere Captain........Needa just isn't that posh like Palps & Vader....or Tarkin........maybe Piett.......The TIE shuttle should have stayed........out of focus, let your mind fill in the blanks, it doesn't have to be the repeditive Lambda class.

But I know Ady has his mind set on this....so I'll not bring it up again.

J

No but seriously, I think you might be a tad wrong, if I may point out that in the next film a Lambda shuttle is used for "mere" crew and technical parts for the forrest moon.

Not even Piett or his Lieutenant bats an eye at the Lambda shuttle, so I think they are are used quite often, the question is, should Vader and the Emperor arrive in mere cargo and crew shuttles?

Yeh, that's one thing that's being changed in ROTJ:R. The Tydirium is going to look more like a cargo shuttle. I never understood why they used the same design as a ship that carries dignitaries.

Do you mean the Sentinel-class shuttle? Because that would be awesome, it wouldn't be too different from the Tyderium, but it would at least be a proper cargo shuttle.