logo Sign In

zombie84

User Group
Members
Join date
21-Nov-2005
Last activity
12-Jan-2024
Posts
3,557

Post History

Post
#206082
Topic
ITS HAPPENED-- OOT AVAILABLE FROM LUCASFILM
Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa
hmm so i wonder will the people who started edits/transfers drop there work now.


I say "put work on hold". We still dont know just what the quality of the video and audio is. If its a bit grainy or scratchy there may be another way of preservations which mesh the 2006 OOT with the 2004 SE to give us the best available transfer yet.

Post
#205871
Topic
Star Wars Original Trilogy had 'it', but 'it' is hard to explain.
Time
Originally posted by: darkhelmet
If you look at his filmography as a screenplay writer on IMDB.com, the ratio of story writing to script writing is substantially higher. He isn't credited with screenplay at all for ESB and only as co-writer for ROTJ, though the stories for both are his. I believe Lucas can have great ideas for stories as evidenced by the great adventures of the Original Trilogy and by those of the Indiana Jones films as well, but as a script writer, his dialogue is always pretty wooden. THX1138 owes more of its emotional effect to the lack of dialogue than it does to its presence.

I'd definitely like to know what was going on in Lucas's world for the PT that hindered him from getting great script input from others. Aside from that, I think his filmography shows that his skills as a script writer were not necessarily substantial to begin with, and any decrease in his writing skills would go far to explain the PT scripts.

Yeah, you are on the right track i think. His stengths are in storytelling, editing and visuals, but he lacks in character and emotion, which is what his collaborators provide. Huyck and Katz wrote most of the dialog for Graffiti while Lucas wrote the scenes and the general tone of the film, and the result is a remarkable convincing portrayal of the 1962 cruising era (combined with a terrific cast made it even more compelling).

What was the difference for the PT? Well, all of his circle of friends have basically drifted apart. When he wrote Star Wars he would share all the drafts with his filmmaking friends such as Coppola, Milius, DePalma (who actually re-wrote ANH's opening crawl), Ritchie, Kaufman and of course his brilliant wife Marcia who is one of the unsung heroes of the American New Wave IMO. He took all of their comments and criticism and reshaped the story based on their input. Then he had Katz and Huyck do a rewrite of the dialog, and of course he had a fantastic editing team that made the most out of the material he shot (which included his wife, who won an oscar for the film--the only oscar the Lucases ever had). ESB and ROTJ had similar circumstances, although he was more secluded from his original friends. But he still had conferences with Kershner, Kurtz and Kasdan and of course Kasdan rewrote the final drafts of the film (and then you have some better directing to boot). True ROTJ is a little weak but that really has to do with the fact that story-wise they wrote themselves into a corner with a lot of it. Anyway, by the time he got to the PT he basically just wrote it all himself. Even in 1983 there was an interview where he basically says that the story is in his head so much that he doubted anyone could get it out just the way he wanted it. Frank Darabont was approached in 1993 to be a co-writer but the need for him never arose--because Lucas basically kept on writing on his own. He did it all by himself, and thats why the critical hand of a co-writer is sorely missed.

Maybe your script is a more comprehensive one (definitely likely), but the one I was pulling the 13 page script info from did actually say in its introduction that 13 pages at one point did take him a year to write.


The book is wrong. Theres so much misinformation about the early drafts of Star Wars. By his own admission he began it in January of 1973, just as he finished the editing of American Graffiti, and by May he had a 13 page adaptation of Kurosawa's Hidden Fortress that he called The Star Wars. He basically started over and wrote a new full-length script that was about 140 pages or so and was completed in May 1974, one year later.


Thank you for clearing up the script writing percentage for me. I guess I've been just so disappointed with Lucas's latest efforts, I was hoping the answer was as easy him having had a huge amount of help on the script. I'm tossing out my unused crazy pill prescription as we speak.

Would be interesting to know how much difference those script changes made. Is the pre-Huyk/Katz-influenced script out on the Bendu site? (I'm at work and need to get off the forum soon.)

Thanks for all the info zombie84!


If you read the Annotated Screenplays there is an asterix beside certain lines to indicate what contributions Huyck and Katz made. Just thumbing through it myself there isnt a lot of influence but when it comes it certainly is effective--Han's most famous lines are mostly theirs, such as him and Luke's conversation in the control room ("if you rescue her the reward will be more than you can imagine" "i can imagine quite a bit") as well the classic "slight weapons malfunction" conversation Han has after the detention block shootout where he finally blasts the radio ("boring conversation anyway").

Post
#205847
Topic
Star Wars Original Trilogy had 'it', but 'it' is hard to explain.
Time
Well actually Lucas wrote most of American Graffiti, THX 1138, ESB and ROTJ himself, but while he was doing that he was getting valuable input from his friends (i.e. Coppola saw every draft of SW). The substandard PT writing is a combination of more formal and stilted subject matter, the fact that his skills have decreased and the fact that he had little input in the scripting phase.

Originally posted by: darkhelmet

Lucas didn't like to write scripts, and it took him a year to write only 13 pages of an original draft. The script was waaay out there; if it hadn't been toned down, SW wouldn't exist as we now know the original 1977 film. From the details in the introduction of the official film script published in 1994 by O.S.P. Publishing, Inc., it probably would've been more like a fantasy film than a sci-fi film.

Actually the 13 pager he wrote between january and may of 1973. The 140 page rough draft is what took him a year, and really i think if it was cleaned up it would make a pretty exciting space fantasy picture (its quite different from Star Wars).

Now, you say, "Wait a minute... Star Wars isn't really sci-fi; it's deeper than that. It's cinema." To which I reply, "Indeed it is cinema, but I think that the studio had more to do with that than the pomp and circumstance of Hollywood legend may lead us to be believe."

For instance, Han was, at one point, to be a green-skinned reptilian-type alien (ala Greedo, perhaps?). Why the change to a human character? Maybe the studio wasn't ready to bet that a Reptilian/Wookie duo would play convincingly with humans Luke and Leia.


Yes, i agree. Lucas originally wanted the bad guys to be the humans and the good guys to be (mostly) aliens but of course this wasnt really doable in 1977 except for some pretty dodgy man-in-suite effects. As it stands Lucas was able to throw in a good percentage of non-human characters in the mix (the droids, chewbacca) but then having the rest of the speaking parts played by humans balanced it out and allowed audiences to connect to the principles whilst still being wowed by the unearthly characters. If Lucas had gotten his way there would have been much less humans and im sure the audience connection would not have been as strong.

I remember reading or hearing somewhere that Lucas only ended up writing 30% of the dialogue for Star Wars (if someone can confirm this and tell me what the source is, I might finally be able to stop feeling like I'm taking crazy pills). If the studio really was concerned that this film wouldn't make much money, and they probably were a little concerned since the decision to allow Lucas to make his film followed on the heels of one of the worst first fiscal quarters of Fox's history, then it makes sense if they asked him to work with some other writers.


Actually its the reverse. After Lucas had written the final draft, while shooting was about to commence in England, his friends Willard Huyck and Gloria Katz visited him and did a quick polish on the script which mainly improved dialog (Huyck and Katz also co-wrote Graffiti with Lucas). In Annotated Screenplays it states something like about 30% of the dialog is attributed to them (they also added some of the humorous bits like chewie scarring the mouse droid). Fox actually had nothing to do with it, Lucas asked them himself at the last minute.

If you are interested in seeing where a lot of the ideas behind the OT germinated the Annotated Screenplays is a very informative source. If you want to read the actual early scripts themselves they are available at the JEDI BENDU SCRIPT SITE
Post
#205772
Topic
Star Wars Original Trilogy had 'it', but 'it' is hard to explain.
Time
Its nothing that mysterious, its a very well told story with terrific characters that has all the elements imaginative young boys like--chases, explosions, awesome special effects, aliens, shoot-outs, swordfights and every possible matinee staple from pirate adventures to cowboy films. Throw in the always-popular story of the underdog triumphing, of the little guy "going the distance", a nobody becoming a somebody, something everyone years to be but most importantly young kids, and you have a formula for a classic. There really isn't any other movie that has combined these elements in quite a way since, LOTR being the closests comparison perhaps but the super-melodramatic gravitas and overlylong running time of those films prevent it from being as accessible for casual viewing as the more straightforward Star Wars films.
Post
#204681
Topic
Star Wars books and summer sunsets
Time
Splinter of the Minds Eye and Shadows of the Empire are nearly my entire EU library. They're just not that good.

I read Tales From the Bounty Hunters, which i enjoyed very much because its not very EU-ish and coolest of all takes place mostly at the time of the OT (short stories too, so if you dont like one its over fast). Timothy Zahn's trilogy (Heir to the Emperor, etc.) is also pretty good. Other than that i can't really recommend much. I re-read Splinter earlier this year and found it to be much better than i remembered.
Post
#204510
Topic
An exact quote from Lucas on Greedo shooting first.
Time
From the screenplay:



GREEDO
That's the idea I've been looking
forward to killing you for a long
time.

HAN
Yes, I'll bet you have.

Suddenly the slimy alien disappears in a blinding flash of light. Han pulls his smoking gun from beneath the table as the other patrons look on in bemused amazement. Han gets up and starts out of the cantina, flipping the bartender some coins as he leaves.

HAN
Sorry about the mess.



Hmm, i missed the part where it says "Greedo fires first and then Han fires back." Guess he forgot to write it in there. And edit it in the film. And then accidentally staged it all like a classic western salloon shoot-up. And also staged the Kenobi lightsaber scene in the exact same way.
Post
#203411
Topic
Star Wars Trilogy tops IGN's "Most Wanted DVDs"
Time
ESB has the least changes because its the most well made. It relied on human actors and not effects. So unless Lucas creates a CGI harrison ford or replaces the yoda puppet theres not much more he can do to "improve" it.

And i have a feeling Marquand would be fine with the musical number, especially since he already was shooting a musical number in Jedi to begin with (it was edited down because the technology was thankfully not yet advanced to allow filmmakers to produce such crap). Marquand was what we calla puppet director. ROTJ was always more Lucas' film than Marquand.
Post
#200454
Topic
Watched Star Trek II on HBO the other day, what a difference in effects compared to the OT!
Time
$11 million is not "modest", its relatively low for a space adventure film. Star Wars had squeeked by with roughly $9 million five years earlier but due to inflation this is not comparable. Empire cost over twice the amount of STII (rough 25 mil) and Jedi, released the next year, cost about three times Wrath of Kahn (about 32 mil). So the statement "it was pretty low-budget" is indeed correct for this type of films. Even your average comedy was costing slightly more than Kahn's budget.
Post
#200316
Topic
Star Wars out next year???????
Time
Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
Sometimes that's the case and sometimes it's not. Like in The Princess Diaries, which was shot in open matte, there ended up being an unintended boom mic in frame on the fullscreen version. But Zemeckis has been quoted as saying that he shot it in 1.33:1 because he knew that more people would end up seeing it on a home format anyway. And Bob Gale said on the commentary that they didn't have any interest shooting it in widescreen because they didn't consider Back to the Future to be a movie suited for any wide angles. It was just matted that way because it had to be so for theatres.


well i suppose you have a point. i would still prefer the matted version since, even though it was covered for open matt, the composition was still chosen with the matt in mind and represents the truest translation of the cinematographers framing, even though the open matt is an acceptable alternate compromise.

Post
#200301
Topic
Star Wars out next year???????
Time
Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
Well, in this case, fullscreen isn't quite as foolish as you'd think since it's an open matte movie, and you're actually getting more of the picture in fullscreen.


Your not getting the intended area though. Widescreen is not important--Original Aspect Ratio is. Otherwise its just as bad as fullscreen--the point is that the intended composition is ruined.