logo Sign In

xhonzi

User Group
Members
Join date
30-Oct-2005
Last activity
13-Oct-2020
Posts
6,428

Post History

Post
#406544
Topic
Gaffer Tape's YouTube Reviews of Awesome Candy-Creating Goodness! (The Facts of Life/Star Trek III Conspiracy!)
Time

My problem is that I don't do any April planning until April.  What's that you say?  Do some April planning in March?  But April is a whole month away!

Then I wake up on April 1st and think- Ah, April!  What planning do I need to do?  Well, there's April Fools Day, and then there's East- CRAP IS THAT TODAY!?!?!?!?

So, I never get to pull off any sweet capers due to my genetic inability to plan ahead.

Post
#406487
Topic
LOST
Time

This week's episode gave me some fodder for my undying Widmore is the Secret Founder of DHARMA theory:

1. He used Pylons just like DHARMA did to keep smokey out.  The other-others use Ash.

2. He had access to surveys that DHARMA (Jin) conducted in the 70s.

Back to the Ash/Pylons thing... it fits in with my idea that there's often conflicts between Science and Faith on Jacob's team.  When Ben assumed command of the Others, he represented "Faith."  "Faith that the island would fulfill its role."  Widmore, presumably, represented "Science."  I still think that Ben cast him off the island when he found out that Widmore had secretly brought DHARMA to the island.  He brought them to the island to study it, so that they could "cause" the island to fulfill its role.  So they could understand and then recreate the phenomena of the island in case it ever "went on the blink."

And the function of the island?  More and more it seems that it is to contain the smoke monster?

Also, consider The Book of Revelations in the Bible, chapter 20: 1-3 http://www.awitness.org/biblehtm/re/re20.htm

20:1  I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand.

20:2  He seized the dragon, the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole inhabited earth, and bound him for a thousand years,

20:3  and cast him into the abyss, and shut it, and sealed it over him, that he should deceive the nations no more, until the thousand years were finished. After this, he must be freed for a short time.

It's possible that the island is the prison of that old serpent, the devil.  And that he is either preparing to be loosed for a season, or he is going to be bound again- to repeat the cycle in another 1000 years.

Post
#406454
Topic
EU Fantasy Casting
Time

Daala?

What this thread has helped me realize is how much of the EU I really don't like.  On average, I feel like I'm an EU advocate here.  I never pretend it's more than it is and I've read less that 25% of what's out there now... but I'm glad it exists and I'm a pretty big fan of the Thrawn Trilogy, of certain ideas in Dark Empire, less of Dark Empire II and a good portion of the Tales of the Jedi line.  I'm currently reading Bane stuff now and that seems to be pretty decent. 

The rest can go hang, I guess.  Even the stuff I find somewhat tolerable, the "new" characters seem to be the weakest part of it.  As in the Jedi Academy trilogy- I totally think Luke would start an Academy or something to try to recreate the Jedi order... so that part I can dig... and I think, inevitably, since he is a new master and making it all up from scratch that he would have several students "wash out" at best and "turn to the dark side" at worst, so I can dig that too...  But... Kyp and Daala.... I haven't read the books since they came out, but I have no fond memories of these characters.

So, in a way, this thread has asked me: What EU Characters are good enough that they deserve my effort in trying to come up with an actor to portray them.  And I think my list is mostly over aver 4 or 5 attempts.

Oooh!  I just remembered one more:  Cade's mom in Legacy.  She hasn't had a lot of... er.... page time... but she seems to be a pretty interesting character.  I'll have to dedicate some of that precious time to finding her a matching thespian.

Post
#406238
Topic
WHY we like the things we like (and why we don't that which we don't)
Time

In the book "How We Decide" by Jonah Lehrer, he talks about an experiment involving Strawberry (or, perhaps, grape) jelly.

They asked one group of students to rate 5 or 6 brands of jelly based on how "good" they thought they were.  The results were very repeatable and the top brand was always top and the bottom jelly was always bottom.

THEN!  They asked people to rate the jellies based on certain criteria.  i.e.: Texture, flavour, Seeds/Seedless, Spreadability, etc...  NOW the worst jellies were winning the votes! 

It seems that when rationale is demanded to explain our emotional responses... that we, unable to explain them rationaly, change our emotions to fit that which we CAN explain rationaly.  The worst part of this... is that we may never react emotionaly to that same thing again!