logo Sign In

spoRv

User Group
Members
Join date
6-Jun-2011
Last activity
11-Oct-2024
Posts
2,804
Web Site
http://forum.fanres.com

Post History

Post
#688081
Topic
Why MPEG2 is not as bad as you may think...
Time

Many thinks that MPEG2 is necessarily a bad codec to use, in particular for HD video - because is old, and there are more sophisticated new video codecs around; well, even if AVC (and VC-1, too) is better - a lot, indeed - this "ancient" codec is quite good.

With this, I don't encourage anyone to compress video using MPEG2 instead AVC, at the contrary; but, when you encounter an MPEG2 hi-def source - like HDTV or D-VHS - please don't discard it immediately!

following this table, if an AVC file size is set to 100%, a comparable quality MPEG2 video should have a file size of about 224%, right?

Ain't that cute? BUT IS WRONG!

PSNR should be used to make comparisons between different encoders or quality settings, but with the same codec, not between different codecs...

Infact, MPEG2 (as AVC and all modern video codecs) takes in account the human vision, and works "tricking" the brain (through the eye).

So, if we have two similar images in perceived quality, PSNR could be a totally wrong method to calculate it... SSIM is a better method!

Example:

Quality: 90, PSNR: 43.06 dB, SSIM: 0.9863, Size: 24308 bytes



Quality: 100, PSNR: 58.44 dB, SSIM: 0.9993, Size: 94169 bytes

As you can see, images are really close in quality, right? But, according to PSNR, the first has only 3/4th quality of the second, while using only our eyes, we should disagree, as we think quality is really close...

Conclusion: even if an MPEG2 source has a lower bitrate in comparison to the same (or comparable) AVC one, it should not (necessarily) means that the MPEG2 has a bad quality! Indeed, sometimes it is surprisingly good, if the bitrate used is adequate - and many HDTV and D-VHS files proves this! So, encoding bitrates and codecs used are only parts of the quality equation, along with master used, encoder type, quality settings etc... and, last but not least, our expectations!

***   ***   ***   ***   ***

Personal thought: as in the late years almost all BD releases are AVC (and, in minor part, VC-1), and MPEG2 is almost abandoned, I think many, if not all, standalone BD players have a superior AVC (VC-1) decoder in comparison to MPEG2; so, maybe the one used, probably in a single chip with AVC, it's an ancient one with lower quality in comparison to newest ones found in e.g. HDTV receivers; also, ffdshow (libavcodec) is considered by many the best MPEG2 decoder and I think is not available in standalone BD players.

So, decoding an MPEG2 source (BD, HDTV, D-VHS etc) with libavcodec, and encode it to AVC (at higher bitrate) using X264 (probably the best AVC encoder), and authoring this to a BD-R, *should* improve a bit the quality, instead of using the MPEG2 file "as is" (if it's BD compliant, of course) authored to BD-R...

Can someone confirm/confute this?

***   ***   ***   ***   ***

Resources:

Video quality characterization techniques

MPEG2 decoders comparison (PDF)

Restoration tips: Kush Gauge™

Post
#688073
Topic
Info: THE ARRIVAL - Special Edition (seeking a team up) (lots of useful info)
Time

...this is the link I wrote in post 39; still, it's unclear if some materials are the same, or not, of the boxset laserdisc...

Thanks a lot for "It's a Disaster" dissertation; it supports what I, DoomBot and many others thought about the use of grain!

Well, I'd like to make a test clip; let's choose two clips - 30sec each; first thegroovologist, as you are following this thread from a long time; just post starting time (min:sec); DoomBot, you are the second, only because entered late in the discussion, not for importance - you know it!

Post
#688062
Topic
Info: THE ARRIVAL - Special Edition (seeking a team up) (lots of useful info)
Time

Happy to hear both of you liked my efforts; even if the applied grain is not immediately noticeable, it improves a bit the perceived resolution - as this grain plate is from 35mm film, and it's analog and "organic", it should be better than any fake grain IMHO; improving the contrast is important for the final result, too, as change the color grading to a better quality.
As I discovered there is NO italian BD for this movie, I will DEFINITELY want to do this project; but, as I wrote before, it's time to do the "next step", and include extras this time... I'm not sure if the KinoWelt german DVD has the same material found onto the Pioneer boxset laserdisc, but I HAVE to know it... best method will be to make an A/B comparison, but I have only the B part (laserdisc) while missing the A part (DVD)... anybody can help?...or should I start a new "The Arrival [spoRv]" thread right now, and ask there for help?!?

Post
#688052
Topic
PaNup: or, how to upscale PAL + NTSC capture and live (quite) happy...
Time

I tested PaNup using "The Abyss" PAL DVD letterbox, and NTSC R6 DVD, anamorphic; overlaid at 40% PAL and 60% R6 (as it has more resolution); applied at the end a grain plate - LINK

It could be an interesting technique to restore movies that are not available in HD, but only as PAL and NTSC DVDs - or letterbox and anamorphic DVDs.

Post
#688040
Topic
Info: THE ARRIVAL - Special Edition (seeking a team up) (lots of useful info)
Time

I will NEVER do an MP3 version of it!!! (^^,)

So, you should wait for the project release... I want to add ALL the extras - still don't know if release movie + extras as 2x BD-25 or single BD-50 - but I need the german Kinowelt DVD; plus the french and spanish soundtracks!

***   ***   ***   ***   ***

Some quotes from online reviews:

Black levels could stand to be darker and deeper. As it is, they take on a brightness that lends to them a grayish appearance. Most of the image, too, appears washed out, often as if a thin layer of film covers the screen.

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Arrival-Blu-ray/3929/#Review

But if detail is impressive, color is not. During its best moments, the movie's palette is flat and naturalistic. The worst shots suffer from weak blacks and colors that are slightly washed out.

http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/arrivalbluray.php

The image is remarkably color muted and lacking depth and dimensionality often seen in high definition transfers whose original prints date back even earlier than this ones. Contrast is nearly non-existent with blacks washing out into dark grays, and intensive shadowy areas omnipresent in an alien compound fall victim to black crush.

http://www.thehdroom.com/news/The-Arrival-Blu-ray-Review/5161

What also hurts are the non-existent black levels, generating no depth whatsoever as the film is swallowed in ugly shades of flat gray. Colors are subdued and dim

http://www.doblu.com/2011/02/06/the-arrival-review/

Strangely, they were all right... but fear not, we have a solution! (^^,)

Latest tests: left BD, right BD with contrast correction and grain plate applied (click for larger version):

Post
#688035
Topic
Info: THE ARRIVAL - Special Edition (seeking a team up) (lots of useful info)
Time

thegroovologist said:


I'd really go with the Blu-ray version.

 It seems is the only way to go... unless someone is aware of a "hidden jem" HDTV broadcast buried somewhere... and then, it should be analyzed to see if it will be really better than BD...

Also, what about eventual HD streaming?

At the end, BD is not a tragedy; it isn't perfect, it's true, but not completely rubbish... infact, even if grain is almost gone, many details are still retained; as now, it's the best HD version we have, I'm afraid...

Post
#687863
Topic
Escape From New York [spoRv] *BD-25 RELEASED*
Time

Doc, thanks for the info, and the praises! (-^,)

Now, someone has compatibility issues, others not... the mystery thickens!

Maybe it is something connected to the fact that I was forced to reinstall the OS... I should try to re-encode the main video, using the new one to replace the one I used for the BD-25 project, burn a BD and test it in more than few standalone BD players...

Post
#687771
Topic
Disney's Beauty and the Beast [spoRv] <em>BD-25</em> (Released)
Time

You can call me _,,,^..^,,,_ as well - BTW, how can I pronounce it?!? (^^,)

Well, this is an interesting thing... but I'm afraid I have not that french LD!

If some other french user would like to capture it, I will add that track to the final project, but I need to know ASAP as probably I should re-encode the video to accomodate all the files into a BD-25!

***   ***   ***   ***   ***

I watched by myself the movie two days ago... my daughter was not interested, despite the fact I've started this project also thinking about her... well, I must check the video, so I continued to watch it... and, I discovered I haven't seen it before! I watched so many movies, TV series and cartoons during my whole life, and I was sure I had seen it, but with my own surprise, this was the first time!

OK, video is quite good, it doesn't seem from a laserdisc, and resolution is satisfactory, even if not razor-sharp as late animation; color grading is right; I have noted three or four frames with very minor drop outs found in the original source, but they are so little that probably only one will be noted during a normal (read: watched only for pleasure, and not to spot out every single possible error) view, and is not so annoying; I could fix it, it's true, but to me is like a flaw that adds that "vintage" look that I love!The only thing that I noted is colors are sometimes muted - in comparison to BD - but I think they are well balanced and not overly exagerated...

At the end, a good result for a LD based project.

And, by the way, I LOVED the story!

Post
#687622
Topic
Disney's Beauty and the Beast [spoRv] <em>BD-25</em> (Released)
Time

I'm near the completion, but I need someone who can help me with subtitles...

I have all the needed idx/sub files, but don't know how to mux in the final .m2ts file; TSMuxer don't accept it, EasyBD lite neither...

I thought also to OCR them, then let the software re-render them; but this conversion will probably lead to some errors...

Suggestions?

Post
#687305
Topic
Info: THE ARRIVAL - Special Edition (seeking a team up) (lots of useful info)
Time

Found that a German DVD has some extras... here you are the info:

KinoWelt DVD (anamorphic 1.85:1)

Making of "The Arrival" (7 minutes) - featurette
Behind the Scenes (5 minutes) - featurette
Interviews with:
Charlie Sheen, Ron Silver, Lindsay Crouse, Teri Polo, David Twohy, Thomas G. Smith, Cyrus Yavneh, Chuch Finance (7 minutes)
Theatrical Trailer (German / English)


Pioneer Laserdisc Boxset

Extras:

Running audio commentary by director writer David Twohy
Original documentary (exclusive to laserdisc) featuring interviews with:
Charlie Sheen, Teri Polo, Writer/Director David Twohy, Producer Tom Smith, Production Designer Michael Novotny, Director of Photography Hiro Narita, A.S.C.
Also includes: behind-the-scenes footage, storyboards and an alternate ending.
Theatrical trailer

For sure, laserdisc has the audio commentary not found elsewhere; for the other contents, I have not found further info to know if the DVD first three extras are actually the same material found on the laserdisc commentary...

Post
#687299
Topic
Info: THE ARRIVAL - Special Edition (seeking a team up) (lots of useful info)
Time

Actually, I just overlaid the grain plate to the image, but it improved a bit contrast and brightness as consequence!

Can you provide a small clip (let's say 1 min) from the BD, not re-encoded? Choose the part you like less - for grain lack in particular; I'd like to test the grain plate in motion.

Dark_Jedi seems to have added this title to Team Blu's projects, but I'm not sure about it... I offered my help with soundtracks and extra material, still no answer, though... if he will not be interested, and the test will be satisfactory, it could be one of my next project - whenever I'll solve the BD disc compatibility issues!

Post
#687285
Topic
BD authoring help - I need some testers and experts
Time

So, if Halloween plays smoothly (apart slow navigation, that I could confirm I encountered in x264 encoded material), then EasyBD Lite works well, and the problem lies in MultiAVCHD...

You can find MultiAVCHD project file inside the EFNY folder \BDMV\AUXDATA\multiAVCHD.mpf - could you please take a look and see if I forgot something, or made wrong settings? Many thanks in advance!

Post
#687252
Topic
BD authoring help - I need some testers and experts
Time

I did further tests: I played the BD-RE into an old Philips BD-7100; all menu worked flawlessy, but movie stutters after few seconds of normal play; if I go to the next chapter, again movie plays normally then stutters... again and again.

So I cut a random 1 minute clip from the movie, with all soundtracks and subtitles intact, changed the profile from 4.1 to 4.0, replaced the main movie with this short clip, burned all to the BD-RE, replayed it in the BD-7100, and it worked!

Then I remuxed the whole movie at 4.0 profile, burned it to BD-RE, tested with the BD-7100, and... it didn't work - it was like the first time! But I noted that the trailer works well in both cases, I tested the initial and ending credits, and they were ok...

It's a bitrate problem, I thought... then I remembered I've done an AVCHD some years ago that has a bitrate over the standard, and it worked as this... plus, another member wrote that his standalone BD player recognized the BD as an AVCHD...

At the end, it seems that MultiAVCHD has made an AVHCD compliant disc, instead of a BD, even if I chose BD as the final format!!! I used MultiAVCHD 4.1 build 771.

Because the final structure seems to be BD compliant, how can I discover that is instead an AVCHD? Is there a free software that could "convert" the AVCHD structure to BD compliant, without re-encoding?