logo Sign In

ron2112

User Group
Members
Join date
11-Nov-2006
Last activity
27-Apr-2016
Posts
259
Web Site
http://www.the-mosi.net

Post History

Post
#303928
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: adywan
this is the order it will be released:

XVID
DVD-5 PAL ( bare bones with no menus & extra audio tracks for maximum bitrate)
DVD-5 NTSC ( bare bones with no menus & extra audio tracks for maximum bitrate)
DVD-9 PAL
DVD-9 NTSC


I shall endeavor to be patient. And I'd be happy to help with the US PIF chain, so sign me up for that.

Ron Moses
Post
#303762
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Exactly... Ben is spinning a tale for Luke's benefit. He's not going to say, "Before I severed your father's legs and left him for dead in the lava pit, he told me he wanted you to... no, actually, now that I think of it your father never said f**k-all about you as far as I can remember. Here, have it anyway." Almost everything Ben tells Luke about his father is fabrication, so there's no reason this line should be any different.

Ron Moses
Post
#302259
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: teharri
If anyone else could post clips that would be great.


I have more free space and bandwidth on my web server than I could ever possibly use. (Thanks, 1&1!!!) If I could get my hands on all the clips that have been released to date (without going through 114 pages of this thread, hopefully) I'd be happy to host them all up through the release date.

Ron Moses
Post
#300128
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: nohandluke
Let's leave the separate franchises separate - putting Serenity or the Enterprise in Star Wars just because we can seems like digital effects masturbation rather than meaningful enhancement.


For the record, I was joking. I'll try to make that more obvious next time.

Ron Moses
Post
#299451
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: Kurgan
what is "PIF"? I've never heard that term before...
That and other wonderful acronyms are explained right about here. But to save you a little time:

PIF - Pay It Forward. You send out a disc to a person in return for a pledge from that person to send out (usually three) more copies to others, who then in turn each send out 3 more discs, and so on.

Thanks, Mother's sig!!!

Ron Moses
Post
#299193
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: RoccondilRinon
I know Star Wars is not exactly known for sticking to the laws of physics, but the explosion wouldn't stick where the TIE exploded, all the little pieces would continue along the path of the TIE's motion. It looks fine to me.


Exactly. The camera is tracking the TIE's motion. If the TIE remains center screen as the camera moves, the explosion should do the same. Keep it.

Ron Moses
Post
#299061
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Cool. I wish I had a split-screen for comparison, though. It's hard to tell what's different when everything just looks right! If you had time, I think it would make a great bonus for the DVD to pick a few scenes and run them split-screen, Wookiee Groomer style, to help illustrate some of the more subtle differences.

Ron Moses
Post
#298556
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: adywan
Oh, and before anyone mentions that the colour has been stripped away from the cockpit then this is intentional.


I think it looks right that way, especially with the trench visible. The Death Star is reflecting a lot of light around the place; things are likely to look slightly washed out. I'd expect to see slightly more saturation on approach, but once near the surface or even in the trench, this looks right.

Ron Moses
Post
#298554
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: adywan
...i'm starting to panic because November is almost upon me...


I'm pretty sure I'm not alone when I say you should take as much time as it takes. November would be awesome. But I'd rather wait until February if it means the difference between a product you're happy with and one you had to rush to meet an arbitrary deadline. A few folks might groan, but they won't really mean it.

Ron Moses
Post
#298345
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: Moth3r
I'm sure you meant "whet" - meaning "to stimulate", rather than "wet" which means "to dampen".

/me renews his subscription to pedants anonymous...


I decided to hold my tongue on that one lest my name be listed among those who don't get a copy. Seeing as how I'm champing at the bit and all...

Ron Moses
Post
#298127
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: nohandluke
It's like looking at an optical illusion. I'm getting a headache just trying to figure out - are the words crooked or is it the lines??? This "problem" is beyond me. I'm starting to feel dizzy.

I can assure you the lines are perfectly straight, but feel free to check 'em out in whatever graphics app you happen to have handy. A quick swipe of the rectangular selection tool should do nicely.

Ron Moses
Post
#298056
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: Marvolo
This is nitpicking. How many people look at the crawl, and notice that? You are supposed to be paying attention to the words not the stupid allignment.

This is nitpicking?!? Dude, have you seen the fix list on the first page of this thread? I mean honestly, if one's weighing valid fixes vs. nitpicking, this one hardly seems like the tipping point.

Ron Moses