ricarleite

User Group: Members
Join date: 9-Apr-2004
Last activity: 21-Aug-2020
Posts: 6,592

Post History

Post: #46626
Topic: MORE CHANGES!!! (for the 2004 OT DVD release)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46626/action/topic#46626
Time: 29-Apr-2004 9:29 AM

Wow David Prowse right after Alec Guiness?

Post: #46624
Topic: Plot holes in the SW saga
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46624/action/topic#46624
Time: 29-Apr-2004 9:24 AM

I hope that the ghost thing is explained on episode 3, but if it isnt, we just have to figure it out for ourselves:

Qui-Gon didn't disappear.
Anakin didn't disappear.

Obi-Wan did.
Yoda did.

Qui-Gon was Dooku's master.
Anakin fell for the dark side.

Both Obi-Wan and Yoda were good Jedi knights.

Hmn... I guess that reveals something about Qui-Gon... Maybe he did something we don't know... Maybe he is not the jedi we belive he is...

Post: #46606
Topic: Plot holes in the SW saga
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46606/action/topic#46606
Time: 29-Apr-2004 7:54 AM

I would feel cheated. I mean, he could use the following tricks to fix those plot holes:

* Amnesia (confirmed, is going to be used)
* It was all a dream
* Magic (or the Force)
* It was God's desire
* Telepathical powers being used off-screen by the characters (like, how did Padme know about the hanger)
* Sudden heart atacks (Padme? Dooku?)
* One of the characters is in fact created by some other character's imagination

Post: #46605
Topic: How does Grand Moff Tarkin fit into Ep 3?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46605/action/topic#46605
Time: 29-Apr-2004 7:48 AM

Makes sense. I've always wondered how Motti could speak with Vader like that, and Needa couldn't.

Post: #46602
Topic: Censorship
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46602/action/topic#46602
Time: 29-Apr-2004 7:31 AM

Have you guys seen "Cinema Paradiso"? That priest that watched the movies before the audience did, and ringed a bell on every scene he found to be "objectionable", so they would cut it? I can hear the priest yelling in italian and the bell right now, as I read this.

And about guns being selled in wal-mart, well, watch "bwoling in columbine" and you'll know how I feel about it. 'Nuff said.

Post: #46517
Topic: Plot holes in the SW saga
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46517/action/topic#46517
Time: 29-Apr-2004 2:55 AM

Quote
Originally posted by: HotRod
Again.......What plot holes...........

Name them????

Just wait until episode 3 is done, and I'll show you plot holes the size of sarlaac pit.

Post: #46516
Topic: Last line of episode 3?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46516/action/topic#46516
Time: 29-Apr-2004 2:53 AM

Not really, chroma key was used way before.

Althought in Tron, I'm not sure they filmed it with a bluescreen, as it was all filmes in black and white and colorized later, to have that eerie computer feel on the actors and their clothes. But, surely, almost nothing was there, besides the actors.

Post: #46514
Topic: How does Grand Moff Tarkin fit into Ep 3?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46514/action/topic#46514
Time: 29-Apr-2004 2:46 AM

Quote
Originally posted by: motti_soL
i doubt that Tarkin was more powerful than Vader, its just that he had more might in terms of the Emperor granting him more power.

Sorry, language barrier here, by "more powerful", I don't mean powerful with the force or anything like it, I mean, has more "political power", a higher grading, I mean, like, Vader is below Tarkin in the hierarchy.

Post: #46438
Topic: Last line of episode 3?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46438/action/topic#46438
Time: 28-Apr-2004 4:56 PM

Quote
Originally posted by: Duke Groundrunner
It makes sense that actors on real sets deliver better performances, and the more real things you have on set thats real, the more the actors can react to and play off of. Just think of Star Wars... synthetic sets... synthetic props... digital creatures... God do I feel for those actors.

And that's why many actors hate doing it. Peter O'Toole was originally cast as the villain in Tron, but when he learned he would have to act against bluescreens all the time, he refused to do it. I wonder what Sir Alec Guiness would have thought, if asked to act only to bluescreens - I mean he acted with real actors all the time during ANH, and he still hated it so much...

Post: #46305
Topic: Can't stop clicking!!
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46305/action/topic#46305
Time: 28-Apr-2004 4:28 AM

Ok, even if we gather lots of signatures, the folks at Lucasfilms must be aware of our petition. Are they? Have any of you come in contact with them?

Post: #46304
Topic: Sequel Trilogy? Say it's so!
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46304/action/topic#46304
Time: 28-Apr-2004 4:25 AM

I've never seen Highlander, but he is supposed to be immortal, right? What if we cut him to bits and pieces? How can you survive that?

Post: #46303
Topic: How does Grand Moff Tarkin fit into Ep 3?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46303/action/topic#46303
Time: 28-Apr-2004 4:24 AM

How powerful was Vader, anyway? I asume Grand Moff Tarkin was closer to the emperor than Vader was... And the way Motti speaked to him ("your sad devotion"...), he wouldn't speak like that if Vader was really powerful.

Post: #46302
Topic: Plot holes in the SW saga
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46302/action/topic#46302
Time: 28-Apr-2004 4:22 AM

It wouldn't make sense having an older Luke or Leia. What happened to Padme during the time it took for the younger one to be born? Besides, they are really twins. And the "Leia remembering her mother" thing, I belive she was raised by another woman who claimed to be her "mother".

Post: #46301
Topic: Carrie Fisher vs Natalie Portman
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46301/action/topic#46301
Time: 28-Apr-2004 4:14 AM

Quote
Originally posted by: Joker_Smilez
ricarleite, what do you mean about Mark being "differant"? He's supposed to be more "aged". One, because he's maturing alot as he learns of the Force. I mean, I think he's pretty much the same in ESB as in ANH up until him going to Degobah. Then he starts to change.

I know, but, but it goes off-character, it almost looks like it's not the same person. Like Peter Sellers in the original Pink Panther, and in the post-1975 Pink Panthers.

Post: #46299
Topic: James bond is awesome
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46299/action/topic#46299
Time: 28-Apr-2004 4:00 AM

Bond is tied up to a chair.

"So, what is it going to be? A slow moving laser bean? A golden gun duel?"
"No, Mr. Bond. None of that." *turns the radio on, dances, and cuts bond's ear*

Now, wouldn't it be cool to have a Tarantino Bond movie with Steve Buscemi as the Bond villain, and Uma as Bond girl? Of course Tarantino himself would be Q, and Samuel L Jackson as M.

"So, M... stans for MuthaFucka?"
"Corret-a-mundo."

Post: #46235
Topic: Plot holes in the SW saga
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46235/action/topic#46235
Time: 27-Apr-2004 2:31 PM

Oops, fate = faith! Sorry. You know, it's from that scene... oh never mind.

Post: #46224
Topic: Plot holes in the SW saga
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46224/action/topic#46224
Time: 27-Apr-2004 2:17 PM

Well, I find your lack of fate disturbing, motti.

Post: #46203
Topic: best crane machine ever
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46203/action/topic#46203
Time: 27-Apr-2004 11:52 AM

There's that saying, "we are what we eat"...

Post: #46200
Topic: Funniest Movie Ever
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46200/action/topic#46200
Time: 27-Apr-2004 11:50 AM

One day, I have come with the idea of creating a Pink Panther movie with a CGI Peter Sellers, but then I've come to my normal senses, and slaped myself with a large fish, for having considered such a horrible thought.

Post: #46197
Topic: James bond is awesome
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46197/action/topic#46197
Time: 27-Apr-2004 11:44 AM

But I remember reading somewhere that the Casino Royale book is kinda different from the other Bond books, that's why Casino Royale was later adapted to a "comedy" (and I use the word "comedy" with caution, here) and was not released as an official Bond movie. The same thing would happen to the Tarantino version (which I belive would be something like "From Dusk to Dawn" meets "Austin Powers" with no jokes, with a little bit of "Goldfinger" and "Resevoir Dogs" on it).

Post: #46180
Topic: NIKKNOTS Stop your whining. Why not think before you post?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46180/action/topic#46180
Time: 27-Apr-2004 9:31 AM

It would be easier to get Lucasfilm to release it...

Post: #46177
Topic: Funniest Movie Ever
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46177/action/topic#46177
Time: 27-Apr-2004 9:23 AM

Quote
Originally posted by: motti_soL
they are making a remake... with Steve Martin (i think) as clouseau.

That would be horrible! Just horrible!

Post: #46176
Topic: James bond is awesome
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46176/action/topic#46176
Time: 27-Apr-2004 9:21 AM

It would be an unofficial Bond movie, pretty much like the original Casino Royale was.

Post: #46146
Topic: What is wrong with Return of the Jedi?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46146/action/topic#46146
Time: 27-Apr-2004 4:10 AM

Osamu Tezuka

Post: #46143
Topic: Plot holes in the SW saga
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/46143/action/topic#46143
Time: 27-Apr-2004 3:54 AM

There's still the problem of Luke having the name Skywalker. I mean, didn't he meet someone in Tatooine who had met Anakin or his mother?

"Skywalker? Are you related in some ways to Anakin Skywalker? Former slave/pod racer?"
"Not that I'm aware of... Anakin Skywalker, eh? Wait a minute, that's my father!"
"He IS? Man... didn't you hear about it? He became Lord Vader."
"Oh crap! I better change my name fast... to... Anikin Starkiller, how does that sound?"