logo Sign In

pittrek

User Group
Members
Join date
16-Nov-2005
Last activity
7-Jul-2025
Posts
2,737

Post History

Post
#558903
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

Harmy said:

https://rapidshare.com/files/4030290992/training_comparison_1080p.mp4

I love the brightness.

I love the colours.

I love the details.

I love how the saber looks.

 

BUT ...

 

The original remote had a black outline : https://plus.google.com/photos/102542760950977079734/albums/5514974191245813441/5553601144067443010?banner=pwa  - do you plan to "restore" it ? If not, I FULLY understand why :-)

Post
#558631
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

Harmy said:

Thanks guys :-)

Here's another one for you:

This is as far as I'm willing to go. I had to go back to the shot's project file and rerender anyway, because there was some funky stuff going on with 3PO's head when the target first passes over it, so I figured what the hell and added a bit of saturation to the sabre.

The still looks EXCELLENT ! When can we see it in motion ? :-)

Post
#557944
Topic
Yoda: CGI vs Puppet
Time

First of all, I always thought that a special effect is done correctly ONLY if you don't realise you have just seen a special effect !

The original Yoda puppet used for Episode V and VI was an example of a correctly done "special effect" - even now, when I have seen literally hundreds of movies, most of them special effect-oriented, and I know how Yoda was created, when I look at the 2 movies, he looks REAL to me. He really looks like a little grey-green old alien warrior-philosopher. He simply looks REAL, and he delivers a great performance. BTW for many years I thought he wasn't a puppet, I thought he was simply a midget in a costume, that's how real he looked (and looks) to me!

 

However something very, very bad has happened in the prequels. The TPM puppet looks like - well, it looks like a puppet. It looks nothing real, it looks like a poorly done puppet. The magic from the original trilogy didn't happen.  So what did the ILM fools do ? They replaced a crappy looking puppet with a crappy looking CGI model. The puppet looks like a puppet, and this new digital Yoda looks like a cartoon character, I can't decide what is worse, but one thing is for sure - I hate Yoda in the prequels. They have done absolutely EVERYTHING wrong - the level of detail, the movement, the ears, the face ... everything looks good enough for a cartoon, or a video game, not for a movie

Post
#557754
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

Harmy said:

 

And as to looking just as bad as the DVD and BD, I think you need to take another look:

Hi, I hope you understand that it wasn't meant to be an "insult" or something but what I was trying to say is that when I've seen it I immediately had the same "No no no no no - this is wrong" feeling, just like I had when I was watching the 2004 DVD.

As I wrote, for the most part I really enjoyed what I've seen :-)

Zombie's page unfortunately doesn't have this exact frame, but other frames from this sequence have the correct "feeling" after applying his "trick"

http://savestarwars.com/goutcorrect-starwars.html

 

 

Post
#556745
Topic
Star Wars coming to Blu Ray (UPDATE: August 30 2011, No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!)
Time

negative1 said:

SilverWook said:

A few "worst of 2011" nominations over at the HTF of interest. ;)

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/f/57591/best-and-worst-of-2011-nominations-and-voting

why would star wars be one of the worst boxed

sets for 'EXTRAS'? i think the extras alone made

it worth getting. (not talking about the other content).

these guys are just doing a knee-jerk reaction. lame.

later

-1

The extras are the ONLY reason I bought the set :-)

Post
#555960
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

Harmy said:

No, no joke. I even used the same process as before, it's not a recreation using a font, it is comprised of the original elements.

It's just 720p of course, so when blown up to 4K, like Mike's picture is, it looks horrible but that's the way it looks at 720p. Now, the jaggies as it progresses further back are unfortunately still there, even when I tried rendering it at 4K, so I don't know what to do about those. But then, they're there a little even on the official SE crawl...

@Moth4: Um, which day is Boxing day again? ;-) We don't have any such thing. We also get our presents on xmas eve after dinner :-P

Boxing day should be the day after Christmas Eve if I remember my English lessons :-)

 

I'm REALLY looking forward to see your "gift"

Post
#555559
Topic
Star Trek TNG on BluRay confirmed !
Time

Chewtobacca said:

 I asked you to explain how Paramount could feasibly release the series on Blu-ray without redoing the effects.  Of course, Paramount could release the DVDs again, but most fans who want those already have them.  In order for Paramount to make it commercially feasible to sell the Blu-rays to fans, many of whom already have the DVDs, it is necessary to offer people an HD experience that would persuade them to upgrade.  The other way is to upscale all the effects, which would look worse than the DVDs.  I wish TNG were in the same situation as TOS and that only the space scenes were done on video, but it's not the case, and I really don't see how including the original effects is feasible.

Actually I would prefer if they make a HD transfer of all the scenes without special effects, and combine them with upscaled versions of the scenes which DO feature effects. It could be interesting