logo Sign In

pittrek

User Group
Members
Join date
16-Nov-2005
Last activity
12-Jul-2025
Posts
2,737

Post History

Post
#904957
Topic
When did you sense a disturbance in the Force?
Time

Never. I was talking about his plans when he started to shoot the original film. It was meant to be much more bloody, as you can see in the early scripts, novel, storyboards etc. Some of his violent ideas were dropped before he got to the final script, some of them were only storyboarded, some of them were actually shot but cut out (like the alien in the cantina which was originally to be sliced into pieces).

Post
#904923
Topic
Help: looking for... any preservations for Caravan of Courage / Battle of Endor?
Time

They are ALMOST the theatrical cuts, but there are some small changes.

Caravan of Courage / An Ewok Adventure : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087225/alternateversions
The Battle for Endor : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089110/alternateversions

Of course assuming that imdb and several other sources are correct.

Post
#904233
Topic
When did you sense a disturbance in the Force?
Time

BobaJett said:

pittrek said:

A kids movie? So that’s why the original version was full of blood, exploding heads, arms being pulled off, humanoid looking aliens sliced into several pieces, alien bounty hunters being toasted alive? Yeah, a typical kids movie.

Yes, I know, he toned down most of the violence in post production and even more in the 1997 SE, but still the movies have many deaths, many arms cut off, the prequels have even things like that Anakin burning alive scene …

I dont know what version you watched, but the only blood I recall is Walrus-Man in the Cantina. The key difference being, it was a creature, a monster, not a human being. Thats why they could get away with it and not get an R rating. In the ANH, they never showed the actual action, only the aftermath e.g. the Beru/Owen skeletons. Had they shown the actual killing and burning, or the action of the sabre slicing off his arm, then it wouldve garnered an R rating most likley. Whose head exploded in ANH? WHose arm was pulled off in ANH? When I stated that it was aimed at kids, I was refrring to ANH specifically, not the later movies. Once ANH became a sucess, George was able to be a bit more liberal in the next films. He probably figured he should appeal to a broader demograph for more sucess. Had the PG-13 rating been around back then, ESB and ROTJ probably wouldve recieved a PG-13 rating.

I am talking about his “original vision”. We know that the first movie was planned to be much, MUCH more brutal. Some of the brutal scenes were shot, some of them were only planned, and even those who WERE shot were either edited down for the 1977 release or censored in the 1997 version.

Let’s be perfectly honest - he didn’t want to do a kids film. But he was forced to because he had the rights to the merchandise stuff.

Post
#904115
Topic
When did you sense a disturbance in the Force?
Time

A kids movie? So that’s why the original version was full of blood, exploding heads, arms being pulled off, humanoid looking aliens sliced into several pieces, alien bounty hunters being toasted alive? Yeah, a typical kids movie.

Yes, I know, he toned down most of the violence in post production and even more in the 1997 SE, but still the movies have many deaths, many arms cut off, the prequels have even things like that Anakin burning alive scene …

Post
#903347
Topic
Harmy's RETURN OF THE JEDI Despecialized Edition HD - V3.1
Time

ksakacep said:

I personally think that there is no need to release v3.0 of all of the films at once - simply because SW v2.5 really needs an update and there is more demand for Despecialiazed SW than for ESB and ROTJ (mainly because this film is the most altered). Also, v3.0 of SW will be the biggest leap because apparently a bunch of new sources became available. But that’s just my humble opinion, of course it depends on Harmy and the rest of the community.

Anyway, really looking forward to v2.5 of ROTJ and all other future releases, thank you Harmy!

Oh come on. There’s nothing “that” wrong with SW v2.5 unless I missed something