- Post
- #972713
- Topic
- Will we ever see the original trilogy released
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/972713/action/topic#972713
- Time
I still think we’re gonna get the OOT released next year, or after the new trilogy gets released
I still think we’re gonna get the OOT released next year, or after the new trilogy gets released
Star Wars destroys Star Trek. TNG never fails to puts me to sleep, and TOS is campy as hell. Never even seen the others. Frankly, and I’m sure I would be shot by Trekkies for saying this, the first time I’ve genuinely enjoyed Trek is the JJ movies. Sue me.
How DARE you? How dare you to have a different opinion than millions of other people? Don’t you know that in this modern era you’re supposed to like everything that other people like?
Seriously, yes, TOS is campy as hell and that’s just one of the many reasons it’s great. But I don’t agree about TNG. There are many episodes which are simply dumb, but I don’t remember a BORING episode. JJ movies are dumb AND boring for me 😃
Cartoons made by people lower on the food chain and mostly watched by kids don’t tell us anything. We’re talking about a cartoon that resurrected Darth Maul FFS. And TCW was not made by Lucas directly anyway (he probably had about as much to do with most of it as he did with TFA), plus it was generally better received than the prequels themselves. The fact that Disney has referenced it tells us nothing at all about the possibility of an OUT release.
Actually he was involved with every bit.
Yes!
pittrek said:
Because the trailer evoked the feeling of a bad guy turning into a good guy.Yep, him saying he’s going to “pull the Rebels apart piece by piece” really gives off a good guy vibe don’t it?
I’m not sure English is their first language so maybe it doesn’t make sense to them.
But no, Thrawn is solidly an Imperial lifer.
Correct, and unfortunately the the trailer didn’t have subtitles. Thanks for the info
Just a quick question - who is supposed to be that Thrawn guy? At least is he a hero or a villain?
Man, you must not be big on EU or at least missed the Thrawn Trilogy books by Timothy Zahn. He’s an Imperial Grand Admiral and arguably one of the most popular EU characters ever created (not to me but a large section of the fan base).
Correct, the only thing I know is that there is something called “Thrawn Trilogy”, but I have never read any SW novel / comic book. So he’s a big villain? Because the trailer evoked the feeling of a bad guy turning into a good guy.
Just a quick question - who is supposed to be that Thrawn guy? At least is he a hero or a villain?
Looks nice. Maybe if I knew who Thrawn is / was / should be I would be as excited as you guys, but I still think it looks nice
Ezra looks MUCH older for some reason
How much later should it take place after season 2?
Isn’t “trek” pronounced the same way as “track”?
Looks brilliant.
Just use SANE ways please
As a person who likes the 1997 SE (but hates the 2004 and 2011 versions) I used to watch my SE VHS tapes before my VCR died
It’s 2016. If they added a new gay character, nobody of the fans would have any problems with it. My problem with it is that they picked up a previously established character. I call it lazy writing. Don’t you know what to do with character X? Well change his / her sexuality
Sorry for the spoiler but both Cho and Takei are went public about it, so I thought everybody interested in the new movie knows it already
So … for those of you who don’t know it yet, they made Sulu gay in Beyond. I thought it’s a horrible idea and it looks like George Takei agrees. Why do they have to do things like that? I don’t understand this type of writing. If they wanted to have a gay character, they could create a new gay crew member or multiple members.
I said it a million times before - giving Yoda a lightsaber is like giving Gandhi a tommy gun.
And why would the Emperor, a guy who shoots lightning bolts out of his fingers need a lightsaber? It’s just stupid. Wouldn’t it be much more creepier/scarier/effective if Palpatine would kill the Jedi who came to arrest him by simply breaking their necks with his mind and slowly going away smiling?
TNG was started in 2011 and released between 2012 and 2014.
And the Blu-rays were a mix of upscaled SD footage (live action scenes for which they didn’t find the negatives in time), CGI scenes (effects scenes shot on film for which they didn’t find the elements, and effects scenes done originally in CG) and new digital composites of new HD scans of original effects elements.
I wrote it so many times in this forum, but I clearly remember:
Were these scenes in the movie? I used to grow up with different high generation bootleg copies of different European prints, so originally I thought that maybe some European country has received a different cut or something like that, but they still can be only a part of my imagination. Why? Because I have absolutely no proof that they existed.
So yes, maybe the memory can play tricks on you. You can’t be 100% sure about anything what happened 4 decades ago unless you have a thing which can be considered a PROOF.
So, the TFA plot is a mix between Star Wars and a Droids episode?
Wow, English can be more confusing than I thought 😃
A quick grammar nazi question - is the “disk” a typo or one of the examples of US English vs. UK English?
I love the fact that at least in some scenes it will be a guy in a costume and not CG unlike in “other” movies
Thanks for the replies.
So, the mono mix sounds like a low bitrate mp3 because it was source from an mp3? 😃 Thanks for the link, I’ll get it asap.
There is a very strange thing with the “We seem to be made to suffer” shot - I tried it 3 times, and 3 times it behaved the same as I wrote. I closed PowerDVD and re-opened it. I played it again and the scene now plays correctly. Weird, but it was definitely a problem on my side.
So, after watching the whole Blu-ray I have to again say THANKS ! I loved it, I was actually excited during the trench battle sequence and DS destruction, which I found hard by watching the DVD/official BD versions