- Post
- #1058408
- Topic
- Random Pictures and Gifs (now with winning!) [NSFW]
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058408/action/topic#1058408
- Time
oojason
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 5-May-2004
- Last activity
- 30-Jun-2025
- Posts
- 8,751
Post History
- Post
- #1058403
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058403/action/topic#1058403
- Time
A bit of class from the London Mayor earlier today…
Sadiq Khan: ‘I won’t respond to Donald Trump Jr’s tweets’ – audio:-
Mayor says London ‘won’t be cowed by terrorists’:-
We are not afraid’: Theresa May’s statement to MPs – video:-
MP James Cleverly’s emotional tribute to murdered police officer – video:-
- Post
- #1058362
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058362/action/topic#1058362
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
In America, we have freedom of speech. None of us have to like what he said and I never claimed to agree with what he said on any level. I am sad to hear about what happened and the U.K. and I am personally glad the sob was shot and killed.
Freedom of speech is in a lot of places, and has nothing to do with what I said.
You said ‘…to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.’
I said 'In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?’
Would you like to answer the question about whether you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Jason, you and I get along well, and I’m not going to argue platitudes with you. I don’t support what he said, I don’t like what he said, but he has the right to say it. I read the U.K. article and the article does indeed start out the way I posted it. I took nothing out of context but it is obvious that a lot of people feel that Donald Jr. did. Cool, I’m not arguing their right to do so, nor am I arguing about people feeling that way.
Now, if that U.K. article is wrong, they should be printing a retraction, and apologize to London’s Mayor for it. I don’t know either the London Mayor or Donald Jr. so I cannot and will not speak for them. It would have been appropriate for him to offer condolences but I cannot answer why he didn’t nor can I make him do it. As you said, he is responsible for his own words and actions, not me not you nor his Father. I am more concerned about my fellow human beings overseas than I am about what he said.
That’s all very well - but the only question was, and is, a simple one:-
Do you think that tweet from him (Trump Jnr) was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
No, I do not think it was some random crappy comment from a Trump relative, he made a statement.
Now, would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you.
Well, you could have just answered that simple question in the first instance instead of what you wrote in between, no?
He did answer it. His answer implied it rather obviously in the context of his statement.
You don’t get to feel superior for badgering someone until they answer exactly how you would have them answer. If his answer is to respond about why Jr said that, rather than just “no”, then you should read into that. This is a conversation, not a congressional hearing.
Who is feeling superior? Not many people. Not me for sure. Why would anyone want to?
To be answered with ‘In America, we have freedom of speech here…’, which if anything could be interpreted as evading the question - or maybe come across as superior, no?
No. He said Jr. had the freedom to say it, which in context means he thinks Jr. said it.
A simple question can have a simple answer.
But again, this is a conversation. If he wants to elaborate or meander or what have you, he can. That’s how conversations work. Again, this is not a deposition. Even if a simple question can have a simple answer, a simple answer is not required. The fact that you could not infer a “no” from his answer is on you, not him.
Don’t badger people for direct answers like that. It’s rude.
Plus, why would I feel superior? Why would anyone want to? Why did you even write ‘You don’t get to feel superior…’?
Because, instead of letting it go, you’re still talking about it. You did badger him, as evidenced by his telling you to step off his hands. And afterward, you thanked him for finally letting you get your way–and in effect congratulating yourself. The appropriate thing to do would have been to apologize for making him do it.
No, I actually thanked him for his answer because that’s the appropriate and polite thing to thing to do and acknowledge - especially since Fo was polite in his previous statement (and usually is in general). If you misinterpreted that, that is on you.
Also, I’m not the one still talking about it - just previously ‘No worries - it seems I won’t be getting an answer from you. That’s ok too. Though feel free to meander on - or what have you…’ yet you’re still talking about it… and I have a feeling your next post will likely too…
Social interaction is not always overt. It has subtleties. One can convey things without saying them outright. He can say “no” without actually saying the word “no”, and you can pat yourself in the act of thanking someone.
It certainly can, though this didn’t occur here - as previously stated.
- Post
- #1058355
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058355/action/topic#1058355
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
In America, we have freedom of speech. None of us have to like what he said and I never claimed to agree with what he said on any level. I am sad to hear about what happened and the U.K. and I am personally glad the sob was shot and killed.
Freedom of speech is in a lot of places, and has nothing to do with what I said.
You said ‘…to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.’
I said 'In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?’
Would you like to answer the question about whether you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Jason, you and I get along well, and I’m not going to argue platitudes with you. I don’t support what he said, I don’t like what he said, but he has the right to say it. I read the U.K. article and the article does indeed start out the way I posted it. I took nothing out of context but it is obvious that a lot of people feel that Donald Jr. did. Cool, I’m not arguing their right to do so, nor am I arguing about people feeling that way.
Now, if that U.K. article is wrong, they should be printing a retraction, and apologize to London’s Mayor for it. I don’t know either the London Mayor or Donald Jr. so I cannot and will not speak for them. It would have been appropriate for him to offer condolences but I cannot answer why he didn’t nor can I make him do it. As you said, he is responsible for his own words and actions, not me not you nor his Father. I am more concerned about my fellow human beings overseas than I am about what he said.
That’s all very well - but the only question was, and is, a simple one:-
Do you think that tweet from him (Trump Jnr) was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
No, I do not think it was some random crappy comment from a Trump relative, he made a statement.
Now, would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you.
Well, you could have just answered that simple question in the first instance instead of what you wrote in between, no?
He did answer it. His answer implied it rather obviously in the context of his statement.
You don’t get to feel superior for badgering someone until they answer exactly how you would have them answer. If his answer is to respond about why Jr said that, rather than just “no”, then you should read into that. This is a conversation, not a congressional hearing.
Who is feeling superior? Not many people. Not me for sure. Why would anyone want to?
To be answered with ‘In America, we have freedom of speech here…’, which if anything could be interpreted as evading the question - or maybe come across as superior, no?
No. He said Jr. had the freedom to say it, which in context means he thinks Jr. said it.
A simple question can have a simple answer.
But again, this is a conversation. If he wants to elaborate or meander or what have you, he can. That’s how conversations work. Again, this is not a deposition. Even if a simple question can have a simple answer, a simple answer is not required. The fact that you could not infer a “no” from his answer is on you, not him.
Don’t badger people for direct answers like that. It’s rude.
Once again, it’s not badgering - it’s just a simple question during a conversation - and he eventually answered it.
So what’s the problem?
Plus, why would I feel superior? Why would anyone want to? Why did you even write ‘You don’t get to feel superior…’? No worries - it seems I won’t be getting an answer from you. That’s ok too. Though feel free to meander on - or what have you…
- Post
- #1058350
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058350/action/topic#1058350
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
In America, we have freedom of speech. None of us have to like what he said and I never claimed to agree with what he said on any level. I am sad to hear about what happened and the U.K. and I am personally glad the sob was shot and killed.
Freedom of speech is in a lot of places, and has nothing to do with what I said.
You said ‘…to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.’
I said 'In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?’
Would you like to answer the question about whether you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Jason, you and I get along well, and I’m not going to argue platitudes with you. I don’t support what he said, I don’t like what he said, but he has the right to say it. I read the U.K. article and the article does indeed start out the way I posted it. I took nothing out of context but it is obvious that a lot of people feel that Donald Jr. did. Cool, I’m not arguing their right to do so, nor am I arguing about people feeling that way.
Now, if that U.K. article is wrong, they should be printing a retraction, and apologize to London’s Mayor for it. I don’t know either the London Mayor or Donald Jr. so I cannot and will not speak for them. It would have been appropriate for him to offer condolences but I cannot answer why he didn’t nor can I make him do it. As you said, he is responsible for his own words and actions, not me not you nor his Father. I am more concerned about my fellow human beings overseas than I am about what he said.
That’s all very well - but the only question was, and is, a simple one:-
Do you think that tweet from him (Trump Jnr) was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
No, I do not think it was some random crappy comment from a Trump relative, he made a statement.
Now, would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you.
Well, you could have just answered that simple question in the first instance instead of what you wrote in between, no?
Don’t feel tetchy about it (‘Now, would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you’) - it’s not you whose first thoughts were seemingly to use an incorrect and out of context shitstain of a twitter comment to attack the London Mayor just after a terrorist attack there.
That Trump Jr what a cnut, eh? and those pricks that defend him for it too.
A statement from the Mayor Of London last night on the terrorist attack:-
Jason,
I ask you again (politely and with respect), would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you.
Wasn’t aware I was stepping on them in asking the question - and like stated above it’s not like you made the comment that Trump Jr did - and thank you for your eventual answer.
- Post
- #1058349
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058349/action/topic#1058349
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
In America, we have freedom of speech. None of us have to like what he said and I never claimed to agree with what he said on any level. I am sad to hear about what happened and the U.K. and I am personally glad the sob was shot and killed.
Freedom of speech is in a lot of places, and has nothing to do with what I said.
You said ‘…to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.’
I said 'In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?’
Would you like to answer the question about whether you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Jason, you and I get along well, and I’m not going to argue platitudes with you. I don’t support what he said, I don’t like what he said, but he has the right to say it. I read the U.K. article and the article does indeed start out the way I posted it. I took nothing out of context but it is obvious that a lot of people feel that Donald Jr. did. Cool, I’m not arguing their right to do so, nor am I arguing about people feeling that way.
Now, if that U.K. article is wrong, they should be printing a retraction, and apologize to London’s Mayor for it. I don’t know either the London Mayor or Donald Jr. so I cannot and will not speak for them. It would have been appropriate for him to offer condolences but I cannot answer why he didn’t nor can I make him do it. As you said, he is responsible for his own words and actions, not me not you nor his Father. I am more concerned about my fellow human beings overseas than I am about what he said.
That’s all very well - but the only question was, and is, a simple one:-
Do you think that tweet from him (Trump Jnr) was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
No, I do not think it was some random crappy comment from a Trump relative, he made a statement.
Now, would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you.
Well, you could have just answered that simple question in the first instance instead of what you wrote in between, no?
He did answer it. His answer implied it rather obviously in the context of his statement.
You don’t get to feel superior for badgering someone until they answer exactly how you would have them answer. If his answer is to respond about why Jr said that, rather than just “no”, then you should read into that. This is a conversation, not a congressional hearing.
Who is feeling superior? Not many people. Not me for sure. Why would anyone want to?
To be answered with ‘In America, we have freedom of speech here…’, which if anything could be interpreted as evading the question - or maybe come across as superior, no? I read it, took it in, and as it didn’t answer my question asked it again.
A simple question can have a simple answer.
- Post
- #1058346
- Topic
- What 'a Star Wars Story' / anthology / spinoff film would you like to see?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058346/action/topic#1058346
- Time
TIE Fighter - A Star Wars Story
Good call - it could also lead to some sort of sequel from an opposing point of view… 😃
- Post
- #1058343
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058343/action/topic#1058343
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
In America, we have freedom of speech. None of us have to like what he said and I never claimed to agree with what he said on any level. I am sad to hear about what happened and the U.K. and I am personally glad the sob was shot and killed.
Freedom of speech is in a lot of places, and has nothing to do with what I said.
You said ‘…to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.’
I said 'In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?’
Would you like to answer the question about whether you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Jason, you and I get along well, and I’m not going to argue platitudes with you. I don’t support what he said, I don’t like what he said, but he has the right to say it. I read the U.K. article and the article does indeed start out the way I posted it. I took nothing out of context but it is obvious that a lot of people feel that Donald Jr. did. Cool, I’m not arguing their right to do so, nor am I arguing about people feeling that way.
Now, if that U.K. article is wrong, they should be printing a retraction, and apologize to London’s Mayor for it. I don’t know either the London Mayor or Donald Jr. so I cannot and will not speak for them. It would have been appropriate for him to offer condolences but I cannot answer why he didn’t nor can I make him do it. As you said, he is responsible for his own words and actions, not me not you nor his Father. I am more concerned about my fellow human beings overseas than I am about what he said.
That’s all very well - but the only question was, and is, a simple one:-
Do you think that tweet from him (Trump Jnr) was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
No, I do not think it was some random crappy comment from a Trump relative, he made a statement.
Now, would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you.
Well, you could have just answered that simple question in the first instance instead of what you wrote in between, no?
Don’t feel tetchy about it (‘Now, would you mind stepping off my hands about it? Thank you’) - it’s not you whose first thoughts were seemingly to use an incorrect and out of context shitstain of a twitter comment to attack the London Mayor just after a terrorist attack there.
That Trump Jr what a cnut, eh? and those pricks that defend him for it too.
A statement from the Mayor Of London last night on the terrorist attack:-
- Post
- #1058283
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058283/action/topic#1058283
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
In America, we have freedom of speech. None of us have to like what he said and I never claimed to agree with what he said on any level. I am sad to hear about what happened and the U.K. and I am personally glad the sob was shot and killed.
Freedom of speech is in a lot of places, and has nothing to do with what I said.
You said ‘…to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.’
I said 'In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?’
Would you like to answer the question about whether you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Jason, you and I get along well, and I’m not going to argue platitudes with you. I don’t support what he said, I don’t like what he said, but he has the right to say it. I read the U.K. article and the article does indeed start out the way I posted it. I took nothing out of context but it is obvious that a lot of people feel that Donald Jr. did. Cool, I’m not arguing their right to do so, nor am I arguing about people feeling that way.
Now, if that U.K. article is wrong, they should be printing a retraction, and apologize to London’s Mayor for it. I don’t know either the London Mayor or Donald Jr. so I cannot and will not speak for them. It would have been appropriate for him to offer condolences but I cannot answer why he didn’t nor can I make him do it. As you said, he is responsible for his own words and actions, not me not you nor his Father. I am more concerned about my fellow human beings overseas than I am about what he said.
That’s all very well - but the only question was, and is, a simple one:-
Do you think that tweet from him (Trump Jnr) was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
- Post
- #1058278
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058278/action/topic#1058278
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
In America, we have freedom of speech. None of us have to like what he said and I never claimed to agree with what he said on any level. I am sad to hear about what happened and the U.K. and I am personally glad the sob was shot and killed.
Freedom of speech is in a lot of places, and has nothing to do with what I said.
You said ‘…to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.’
I said 'In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?’
Would you like to answer the question about whether you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
- Post
- #1058274
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058274/action/topic#1058274
- Time
Dear Trump Jr.,
Fuck you
Sincerely,
Warbler
Dear UKers,
I am very sorry to hear about the terrorist attack. You have my heartfelt sympathy and prayers. I hope you do not view Trump Jr. as an example of how all Americans feel about this attack.
Sincerely,
Warbler.
^ Well in, Warbler.
I can’t and won’t speak for all us UK’ers - but suffice to say many of us know it’s the minority of people anywhere - in any country - that make insensitive, untimely, and thoughtless (let alone incorrect) comments like those from Trump Jr today, and is no reflection on anyone but Trump Jr himself and those that seek to defend them.
- Post
- #1058261
- Topic
- [fill in the blank] Just Died!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058261/action/topic#1058261
- Time
RIP to the five people who died today in the terrorist attack in London:-
and best wishes for a speedy & full recovery to all those injured.
- Post
- #1058259
- Topic
- [fill in the blank] Just Died!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058259/action/topic#1058259
- Time
Ronnie Moran - died aged 83.
Legend is a word too easily banded about these days in sport - though this man is one, was one and shall forever be one for many footy fans. Nearly 50 years at one club - from player, to coach to caretaker manager and much, much more.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/mar/22/ronnie-moran-liverpool-dies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronnie_Moran
He used to got to few local non-league sides up until very recently - his love for the game - at any and all levels was still there 😃
RIP Bugsy.
- Post
- #1058253
- Topic
- BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058253/action/topic#1058253
- Time
Diana Rigg (or Olenna Tyrell from Game Of Thrones - as she may be better known to some of the younger people on here 😉)
- Post
- #1058251
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058251/action/topic#1058251
- Time
Nine out of ten Budgies refuse The Sun as cage liner.
Amen brother 😃
This campaign started in the UK last year - to apply pressure on companies to stop advertising - or being associated with - hateful rags like The S*n, Daily Fail and Express ‘newspapers’:-
http://stopfundinghate.org.uk/
https://twitter.com/stopfundinghate
https://www.facebook.com/stopfundinghate
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVywWDUKcDw8yNXMa87ducw
It’s early days, but have already had some success, some publicity, and made many stop and think about the type of company they wish to be associated with - or give money to - as well as the media in general.
Hopefully it’ll have even more success stories - and also prompt people in other countries to stop and think about the more hateful aspects of the media, and what they can do to help stop funding these vile, fear-mongering, divisive and often factually incorrect ‘newspapers’ in their part of the world…
- Post
- #1058241
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058241/action/topic#1058241
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
From what I’ve seen of Jr in the past (long before the Presidential run) he always gives you the feeling that his eyes are maybe faintly glowing fire-red and ‘Carmina Burana’ is playing somewhere in the background. Somewhat similar to the Murdoch family… you think Rupert is bad, until you get to know his son James.
^ sums up anyone connected with that vile rag and the two Murdochs.
- Post
- #1058237
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058237/action/topic#1058237
- Time
Stay classy, Trump Jr!
Someone needs to tell him that when he says dumb things, it reflects badly on dear ol’ dad.
I read the article Donald Trump Jr. was referencing and London’s Mayor did indeed say … Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The comment starts off the article.
So it’s kinda weird that the New York Times would twist the narrative against a Trump and it would get quoted here as factual? Now, I cannot say why Donald Trump Jr. decided to point out the irony of the comment to the person who said it but I would guess that he felt that since someone made the comment about the New York incident they should remember what they said before saying anything about their own terrorist incident?
I don’t have the answers, just the original article quoted, to show that the tweet was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative.
In wake of the London attack today, with people dying and still fighting for their lives in hospital, Donald Trump Jr didn’t send condolences - instead he dragged up an old article to attack London’s Mayor - and even fucked that up by taking The Mayor’s words out of context, or just not understanding them.
Yet you think that tweet from him was not some crappy random comment from a Trump relative?
Really?
- Post
- #1058224
- Topic
- Random Pictures and Gifs (now with winning!) [NSFW]
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058224/action/topic#1058224
- Time
- Post
- #1058223
- Topic
- Random Pictures and Gifs (now with winning!) [NSFW]
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058223/action/topic#1058223
- Time
bloody brave man - white trousers!
- Post
- #1058222
- Topic
- The Random <em>Star Wars</em> Pics & GIFs Thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058222/action/topic#1058222
- Time
^ from https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWars/comments/60y7xq/sith_just_got_real/
- Post
- #1058221
- Topic
- YouTube/Vimeo/etc... Star Wars video finds
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058221/action/topic#1058221
- Time
Star Wars | The Return of the Jedi FanArt:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sWLs89onCY
^ a short, but pretty cool art video 😃
and one for K2SO too:-
- Post
- #1058217
- Topic
- What 'a Star Wars Story' / anthology / spinoff film would you like to see?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058217/action/topic#1058217
- Time
The Jedi Must Die
The story is, in essence, a conflation of Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None (aka, Ten Little Indians) and Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game, with elements of the Star Wars mythos stirred in for good measure.It revolves around the search for a Jedi on a far off planet by a group of serious minded people out to find it. The viewer is invited to unfold the mystery along with the characters. Near the ending, there an inserted 30-second break called “The Jedi Break”, where the audience is asked to guess the Jedi’s identity, based on clues from the movie.
A slight tweak here and there and we could have ‘Cabot Cove - a Jedi Mystery’ with serial killer Jessica Fletcher, her typewriter, and set in a place that is strong with the Dark Side of The Force… 😃
- Post
- #1058208
- Topic
- Star Wars - International Logo Collection
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058208/action/topic#1058208
- Time
(hopefully it may be of use, interest or inspiration for anyone out there 😃)
Not really since this thread was about collecting international logos.
You missed a bit…
"Just a few links to some articles / videos / pictures for information and history on the Star Wars logo, titles, and fonts down the years…
(hopefully it may be of use, interest or inspiration for anyone out there 😃)"
- Post
- #1058061
- Topic
- What 'a Star Wars Story' / anthology / spinoff film would you like to see?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058061/action/topic#1058061
- Time
Ewan McGregor once again expresses interest in Star Wars return as Obi-Wan Kenobi:-
edit - forgot to say I don’t think some of the possible ‘bigger’ Star Wars Stories will happen until after Episode IX has wrapped - just a feeling that Disney will keep them back until after the Sequel Trilogy has finished. Ideas like a Jedi Purge movie, or an Obi Wan film, or Dexter Jettster - The Kitchen Years, to keep them back for a few $$$s more and use the ‘smaller’ ideas until then… it’s just a feeling - and will be very happy if stuff like this is announced before then 😃
- Post
- #1058055
- Topic
- Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058055/action/topic#1058055
- Time
K-2SO’s Original ‘Rogue One’ Ending Revealed By Alan Tudyk:-
http://www.slashfilm.com/k-2sos-original-rogue-one-ending/
Watch: ‘Rogue One’ Ending Meets the Beginning of ‘Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope’:-
http://collider.com/rogue-one-ending-star-wars-beginning-scene-video/#bluray