imperialscum

moviefreakedmind said:

I think from now on team accounts should be outlawed. I cannot think of any reason to have them.

What about a multiple-personality disorder? Team account is not an option, even if “internal” consensus is established, due to the recent prohibition of team accounts. Multiple accounts is not an option as it could be perceived as sock accounts. I guess normal account is not an option either as I assume account sharing is not allowed either.

TV’s Frink said:

Yoda and Chewie are both male.

Prove it.

DuracellEnergizer said:

I can’t believe this discussion is still going on.

What is the difficulty?

DominicCobb said:

I’m all for it. Honestly I can’t think of an argument against it that isn’t homophobic.

When it comes to gay romance being in Star Wars in general, you are right. When it comes to Poe and Finn specifically, you are wrong.

1. Y
2. O
3. U
4. A
5. R
6. E
7. D
8. I
9. C
10. K

The Hateful Eight
I really loved the shoots of landscape. Other than that, it is the usual Tarantino “good but nothing special” film.

TV’s Frink said:

Unless you are referring to something I’m missing, that’s the fault of other people, not the parents. And it’s changing for the better every day.

Well let me put it this way, kids get bullied for much much smaller things by their peers. Having two fathers would certainly be a major bullying matter. While I agree that bullying it unacceptable and should not exist, however unfortunately that is the reality of nature. I don’t know what is the evolutionary purpose of bullying but I would assume it is to cull out any deviation from the current norm of the species. Kids are much closer to animals than adults are and are not nearly as good at suppressing the basic nature for the sake of social norms. Even the best efforts of education of societal norms from parents/teachers in many cases cannot suppress the basic nature in kids.

I am not saying that any of the above-said is right. I am just saying it is the reality. There is no way to pre-program kids to suppress the basic nature and behave according the social norms from the very beginning.

Still I might add that even in practise kids are much better off with decent same-sex parents than abusing heterosexual parents.

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

I could at least understand to some degree people who oppose same-sex parents adopting children, as it affects a third person.

No more than straight couples adopting a child.

Well in theory, yes. But in practice, no.

I could at least understand to some degree people who oppose same-sex parents adopting children, as it affects a third person. But I don’t see why anyone would be bothered by same-sex marriage. It is just a pointless ceremony and a few legal papers that don’t affect anyone but the two.

Ok. But I only said that after enduring two aggressive replies from Frink. And at the beginning I did try to nicely point out the joke despite hostile treatment.

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

moviefreakedmind said:

The Alien/Batman joke was funny, imperialscum added onto it, which was ok. Frink didn’t get it, and then imperialscum ruined the whole thing with misguided and unwarranted conceit.

I didn’t ruin anything.

You are such a victim!

I am not a victim as your trolling really cannot affect me. What is absurd is that moviefreakedmind tried to paint it like you were the victim and I ruined everything.

I have realised that I don’t really like Beatles that much.

ray_afraid said:

moviefreakedmind said:

The Alien/Batman joke was funny, imperialscum added onto it, which was ok. Frink didn’t get it, and then imperialscum ruined the whole thing with misguided and unwarranted conceit.

I’d take someone who didn’t get a joke about Batman over someone claiming he’s too brilliant for another user to comprehend any day of the week.

Agreed. I just realized we’re on page 2 of this crap. I vote this quote be the last word on this subject.

I didn’t ruin anything. The accurate version of events is: http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/906324

TV’s Frink said:

How old are you, thirteen?

Don’t you think it is about time you stop being childish already?

Dek Rollins said:

Face it, Frink, your just as much of a troll as imperialscum is.

I don’t see how I am a troll. My behaviour is decent. I am open to evidence of opposite.

Dek Rollins said:

and Frink started jumping down his throat for no apparent reason.

His obsession with me is quite peculiar I would say.

TV’s Frink said:

It’s not my fault people don’t know how to make a proper thread title.

I guess it is not your fault people don’t know how to make proper jokes (so you could understand them) either? Well it might wouldn’t be entirely your fault for not understanding things. However, your choice of response (i.e. disrespectful behaviour) is entirely your fault.

Possessed said:

defend the guy who WOULD NOT do the same for you.

I most certainly would.

Here are some examples from general Star Wars Discussion boards (at the same time examples of Frink’s usual disrespectful behaviour):

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Curious/id/15972

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Help/id/47920

I see. Ok.

TV’s Frink said:

And anyway, the trolling came after the joke. Maybe you didn’t read the rest, or you need to read it closer.

Maybe you should read the whole thing again yourself. I nicely explained it was an Alien-reference joke, despite your aggressive initial reply. After I was being nice, I got another trolling reply with that picture. What came after that was just you being offended for not getting the joke and me trying to stay as civil as possible, considering all your initial hostility.

TV’s Frink said:

Batman vs. Superman is a real thing and Resurection could be for all I care about Batman EU. But you still aren’t funny anyway so whatever.

I guess Batmans and Batman3 are real things too? You just didn’t get it. I don’t judge you. I guess it was too sophisticated.

Well I guess the joke cannot really be funny if someone had point it out to you that it was a joke. 😕

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

ray_afraid said:

Batman ****
Batmans ***
Batman3 ***

Why do you ignore Batman: Resurrection and Batman vs. Superman?

Because wtf is the first and who could possibly care about the second.

It was Alien-reference joke…

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

1. digital

Ahaahahahahahahahahahaha

I don’t get the funny part. You shouldn’t assume my post is automatically funny just because of my generally amazing wit.

ray_afraid said:

Batman ****
Batmans ***
Batman3 ***

Why do you ignore Batman: Resurrection and Batman vs. Superman?

PsychoDayv said:

I THINK I’M ONE OF THE ONLY ORIGINAL MEMBERS STILL ON HERE.

PROVE IT!