- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I am very curious as to if anyone would know what these are and if there is any value to them. Any information would be greatly appreciated.
This is the back^
The back again.
Info & Quote: Curious - what these are and if there is any value to them?
- Time
- Post link
They look large. What are their dimensions?
What are they made of?
- Time
- Post link
Are you Bi-Curious?
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
Are you Bi-Curious?
No, I am not and I do not appreciate this comment. Thank you, God bless and have a good day.
- Time
- Post link
timdiggerm said:
They look large. What are their dimensions?
What are they made of?
They are pretty large, the dimensions are 5 feet by 1 foot.
- Time
- Post link
timdiggerm said:
They look large. What are their dimensions?
What are they made of?
Sorry, not really sure what the "holders" are made of, but the "posters" themselves seem to be made of cardboard.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
Are you Bi-Curious?
Could moderators already do something about this guy? In every other thread he comes up with off-topic (sometimes even offensive) posts of this kind. I am sure this breaks forum rule number 3, considering how frequent these posts are.
真実
- Time
- Post link
Offensive? Lol.
It's not my fault some people don't know how to make a descriptive thread title.
- Time
- Post link
bluefrog said:
TV's Frink said:
Are you Bi-Curious?
No, I am not and I do not appreciate this comment. Thank you, God bless and have a good day.
It's a question, not a comment. But I will have a good day, thanks!
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
Offensive? Lol.
It's not my fault some people don't know how to make a descriptive thread title.
Although the offensiveness of the message itself may be arguable, the context of your post was clearly disrespectful to say the least. Nevertheless, it is your fault posting off-topic nonsense which goes against the forums rules.
真実
- Time
- Post link
My post is not off-topic or disrespectful given the vagueness of the thread title.
Perhaps you should check out the forum ignore feature.
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
My post is not off-topic or disrespectful given the vagueness of the thread title.
Perhaps you should check out the forum ignore feature.
That is no excuse at all. The thread title indicates the OP is curious about something and in his first sentence of his post he clearly explains what that curiously is.
In my entire "internet career" no one has ever managed to get on my ignore list and I don't think you will have the honour to be the first one. :P
真実
- Time
- Post link
bluefrog said:
TV's Frink said:
Are you Bi-Curious?
No, I am not and I do not appreciate this comment. Thank you, God bless and have a good day.
I don't think Frink was trying to be rude, it was just a question. There are other gay users on this site, so you aren't alone. Folks don't discriminate around here. If someone gives you flak about it, I'm sure other users (myself included) will stand up for you and the moderators will put the kibosh on it.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
ray_afraid said:
I don't think Frink was trying to be rude
Some of us who have been around long enough know exactly what he was trying to be... he was trying to funny (he failed of course but that's not the point). In doing so he was indeed very disrespectful/rude to the OP. And I am not talking about "bi" thing. I am talking about the context of the post. The OP politely asked for help and Frink threw in some off-topic nonsense.
真実
- Time
- Post link
imperialscum said:
ray_afraid said:
I don't think Frink was trying to be rude
Some of us who have been around enough know exactly what he was trying to be...
I've been here almost 5 years. You've been here a few months (under this name).
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
ray_afraid said:
imperialscum said:
ray_afraid said:
I don't think Frink was trying to be rude
Some of us who have been around enough know exactly what he was trying to be...
I've been here almost 5 years. You've been here a few months (under this name).
Even if I joined the forums today I would immediately recognise that...
...he was trying to be funny (he failed of course but that's not the point). In doing so he was indeed very disrespectful/rude to the OP. And I am not talking about "bi" thing. I am talking about the context of the post. The OP politely asked for help and Frink threw in some off-topic nonsense.
(had to post it again since you tried to ignore the part that actually matters)
真実
- Time
- Post link
They look like something to decorate store display cases. Like maybe it was slid onto the top of a DVD/VHS shelf thing in a store.
http://twister111.tumblr.com
Previous Signature preservation link
- Time
- Post link
They're from TPM, I think that answers the question about value.
- Time
- Post link
imperialscum said:
...he was trying to be funny
So was ray, unfortunately.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
timdiggerm said:
imperialscum said:
...he was trying to be funny
So was ray, unfortunately.
I meant every word of what I said*.
Anyways, I believe what you have there, Bluefrog, are displays from Wal-Mart. I remember seeing them back in '99 and thinking Jar-Jar looked terrifying.
*-Ok, so Frink wasn't "just asking a question", it was just a stupid joke. If anybody is offended by it, then they have some issues to deal with :p
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
Offensive? Lol.
It's not my fault some people don't know how to make a descriptive thread title.
Well, I figured that my title would get more people to view my post, that is why I titled my post the way I did. Besides, if I were gay, I wouldn't be posting on here looking for a companion. So, yes to me that was offensive! My posting had NOTHING to do with sexual relations in any way! You were TRYING to be funny (key word: TRYING) and it didn't work. May I suggest that you choose your "funny" comments more wisely in the future?
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
My post is not off-topic or disrespectful given the vagueness of the thread title.
Perhaps you should check out the forum ignore feature.
Actually, it was off-topic, it was not off-title. If you would have READ the post, you would see where you were off-topic. Do not judge a book by it's cover and do not judge a post by it's title. Perhaps you should not say anything if you do not have anything nice to say. Offensive is a relative term and since you do not know me, you have no idea if it was offensive to me or not. If you are in doubt about offensive language in the future, that should be your first clue that it might be offensive.
- Time
- Post link
imperialscum said:
ray_afraid said:
imperialscum said:
ray_afraid said:
I don't think Frink was trying to be rude
Some of us who have been around enough know exactly what he was trying to be...
I've been here almost 5 years. You've been here a few months (under this name).
Even if I joined the forums today I would immediately recognise that...
...he was trying to be funny (he failed of course but that's not the point). In doing so he was indeed very disrespectful/rude to the OP. And I am not talking about "bi" thing. I am talking about the context of the post. The OP politely asked for help and Frink threw in some off-topic nonsense.
(had to post it again since you tried to ignore the part that actually matters)
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Time
- Post link
TV's Frink said:
They're from TPM, I think that answers the question about value.
No, it does not. Why would I come on here and ask if I already knew that they were of no value? I am not a connoisseur of Star Wars, I did watch all of the movies and I used to have a lot of the toys when I was younger, however, I do not know very much about the memorabilia. That is the reason I posted.
- Time
- Post link
twister111 said:
They look like something to decorate store display cases. Like maybe it was slid onto the top of a DVD/VHS shelf thing in a store.
Thank you so very much! I do appreciate the info.