logo Sign In

doubleofive

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Mar-2008
Last activity
30-May-2025
Posts
11,892
Web Site
http://www.doubleofive.com

Post History

Post
#1387740
Topic
Making A SWVC YouTube Video on Han v Greedo
Time

Hey gang, I think I’m going to try my hand at making a Star Wars Visual Comparisons YouTube video covering the changes to Han v Greedo in editing and re-editing, with the goal to prove that Greedo shooting is plain and simple revisionism with no basis in the original edit or filming.

Now that I have most of my sources, I’m going to use this thread for updates. I’m going all out for this video, I’ll let you know if I need anything else!

Post
#1387652
Topic
Possible 'proof' that Greedo was always meant to shoot
Time

Just in case anyone wants to believe anything written in those Archive books:

When the Jabba scene was cut, the Greedo scene did not make sense. It was shown with Greedo speaking an alien language without subtitles in 1977, so it looked like Han just shot in cold blood. Subtitles were added for the 1983 VHS release to clarify Greedo intended to kill Han.

https://twitter.com/kershed/status/1330302102296535042?s=21

Post
#1386158
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

Kingj3489 said:

DZ-330 said:

I understand that Revisited is its own canon, however, has the thought of reversing the change of Chewie getting a medal to not conflict with “The Rise of Skywalker” been considered?

Canonically he did receive a medal. That was revealed in the mainline Star Wars comic in 2015.

And then he gave it away because WOOKIEES DON’T CARE ABOUT MEDALS.

Post
#1381692
Topic
What was changed for 1995 THX version?
Time

The 1995 THX version is based on the same scan used for the 1993 Laserdisc (and therefore the same as the GOUT bonus disc). Home video scans weren’t as invasive as they are now, it was just a copy of an internegative (assumedly) in SD. From what I understand, the “THX” of it was just the standard used to get the master onto the VHS/Laserdisc. They didn’t do anything special for that release, they just made sure the copies were high quality.

Post
#1380423
Topic
<strong>Star Wars: Squadrons</strong> - video game
Time

c0rpze said:

Hey everyone, what’s the learning curve for this type of game if you haven’t played a lot of flight sims? I have played X-Wing Alliance and Tie Fighter on PC a long, long time ago (no pun intended) and own the Battlefront games. Though, I’m average at best at these type of games. I’ve been intrigued by being able to play Squadrons in VR especially after playing the Battlefront X-Wing experience (and that is something else!). I also read up on some reviews and have heard negatives. Any positives you may be able to share?

I was afraid I would not be good at this game, and I’m not, but I’m having fun with it. I have the same experience as you, so I imagine you would be as mediocre as I! I think the key is finding your class and sticking with it. Get good at Bombers or Interceptors, something like that.

Post
#1379818
Topic
Modern SE Revisionism
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

I don’t know but shouldn’t an archive of the making of the Original film actually reflect that film, and not some 1990s cgi that was garbage. Even Rian Johnson referred to the special edition as the cartoon versions.

I wish i could find that comment its probably since been deleted.

Please do! Between that and the interview with JJ where he plugs Despecialized, we’d be really set. I’ve personally asked Rian for a comment (he follows @starwarsviscomp), but no go there.

Post
#1379710
Topic
Modern SE Revisionism
Time

Z6PO said:

The guy (Paul Duncan) interviewed George Lucas recently for his Star Wars books (there’s an Archives for the prequels coming soon), so maybe he doesn’t want to upset George by defending the theatrical cuts? It’s better for his work to stay in good terms, no matter what…

Oh, I’m sure of it. But there’s a difference between not advocating for the theatrical cuts and asking why anyone would want them in the first place.