logo Sign In

crissrudd4554

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Sep-2012
Last activity
6-Jul-2025
Posts
1,254

Post History

Post
#1046517
Topic
Are The Prequels That Bad?
Time

4-6 for me will always be THE Star Wars but I refuse to slack on the PT. Do they have flaws?? Sure but they have their moments. Most of the lightsaber duels were intense and it had some great sets. In the end I just say for better or worse they gave us the story that preceded the films that we love. Are the Prequels bad? No. Could they be better?? Yes.

Post
#1046346
Topic
Do you think Disney will release the unaltered versions for DVD and blue ray?
Time

Fang Zei said:

crissrudd4554 said:

Ryan-SWI said:

crissrudd4554 said:

Says you.

Mature.
Fox owns the rights, but it’s not as simple as that, and I have no idea why everyone on these forums seems to think Fox can just jump up and say “Yes! It’s time to distribute the OOT on 4K!” anytime they want.
There’s a lot of legal hoops they need to jump through with Disney and Lucasfilm. The digital releases were missing the 20th Century Fox logo or is everyone forgetting that? Oh right but it’s clearly as simple as Fox just deciding to do whatever they want, they must have decided to omit their logo from the beginning of those releases just because they felt like it.

For the record Fox retains distribution rights for the original Star Wars, it does not own all the prints for the original Star Wars or the right to scan and/or alter anything without the approval of Lucasfilm and by extension, Disney.

Conflicts of interest and contractual legalities are enough to throw a huge wrench in the works for anything like this. Shutting down discussion that doesn’t align with the hivemind doesn’t change that.

I want a 4K release just as much as anyone but expecting one this year or anytime soon is lunacy and I’ll eat my hat if it happens. Feel free to hold me to that.

I never said Fox can just release it when they want. I was just saying ANH will be distributed through into the foreseeable future provided of course Lucasfilm wants them too. Lucasfilm is really the ones in charge of where the movies are going.

As far as the OOT never being released, I don’t think it’ll be this year but in the future who knows?? Studios always want excuses to resell their shit and simply giving out the same SE everytime is gonna get to a point where that’s not enough of a selling point. But if you are positively, absolutely, truly, undoubtedly, with out a doubt, no second thoughts whatsoever, totally convinced it will never happen well more power to you. But let those who are still holding out hope to their business and dreams, as potentially hopeless as they may be.

I would argue it’s already gotten to that point.

They’ve sold us the same discs three times in a row now.

Plus the digital releases

Post
#1046278
Topic
Do you think Disney will release the unaltered versions for DVD and blue ray?
Time

Ryan-SWI said:

crissrudd4554 said:

Says you.

Mature.
Fox owns the rights, but it’s not as simple as that, and I have no idea why everyone on these forums seems to think Fox can just jump up and say “Yes! It’s time to distribute the OOT on 4K!” anytime they want.
There’s a lot of legal hoops they need to jump through with Disney and Lucasfilm. The digital releases were missing the 20th Century Fox logo or is everyone forgetting that? Oh right but it’s clearly as simple as Fox just deciding to do whatever they want, they must have decided to omit their logo from the beginning of those releases just because they felt like it.

For the record Fox retains distribution rights for the original Star Wars, it does not own all the prints for the original Star Wars or the right to scan and/or alter anything without the approval of Lucasfilm and by extension, Disney.

Conflicts of interest and contractual legalities are enough to throw a huge wrench in the works for anything like this. Shutting down discussion that doesn’t align with the hivemind doesn’t change that.

I want a 4K release just as much as anyone but expecting one this year or anytime soon is lunacy and I’ll eat my hat if it happens. Feel free to hold me to that.

I never said Fox can just release it when they want. I was just saying ANH will be distributed through Fox into the foreseeable future provided of course Lucasfilm wants them too. Lucasfilm is really the ones in charge of where the movies are going.

As far as the OOT never being released, I don’t think it’ll be this year but in the future who knows?? Studios always want excuses to resell their shit and simply giving out the same SE everytime is gonna get to a point where that’s not enough of a selling point. But if you are positively, absolutely, truly, undoubtedly, with out a doubt, no second thoughts whatsoever, totally convinced it will never happen well more power to you. But let those who are still holding out hope to their business and dreams, as potentially hopeless as they may be.

Post
#1045983
Topic
Star Wars parody from the makers of <em>Scary Movie</em> and other movie spoof films
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Um…okay.

I just don’t understand why you have to watch everything that has even the barest of connections to Star Wars, lest you lose your fan card or something.

I never said I did. I said if I did see this new parody movie that would be the reason. That doesn’t imply I will see it.

And trust me I don’t watch everything SW related parody or not. Never seen The Clone Wars (film or series), never saw the Holiday Special in its entirety, never saw Rebels, and still haven’t seen Rogue One yet to name a few.

Post
#1045929
Topic
Do you think Disney will release the unaltered versions for DVD and blue ray?
Time

Ryan-SWI said:

Backtracking a bit here but I don’t know why people keep jumping on the “maybe a 4K release” train, it’s not going to happen this year or any time soon; Disney does not support 4K and they’re not going to suddenly start in the next couple of months with an older Star Wars movie over one of their own animated films or even one of the newer Star Wars films.
As nice as it would be the general consumer has grown up with or gotten used to the SE and a 4K release of the OUT is two niches a billion dollar company is not going to take a gamble on.

Says you. Anyways Fox owns ANH inpertuity (did I say that right??) so if a 4K remaster of that film is done it’ll be distributed by them.

Post
#1042611
Topic
Most pointless Special Edition change?
Time

Perhaps to some this is old news but I just noticed something that serves somewhat of a continuity error. During the sequence in the SE of ANH of the Jawas falling off the Ronto in Mos Eisley, if you look closely in the background (you can clearly see it in the original unaltered film) you can see the cantina. The reason I said this serves somewhat of a continuity error is because of the CGI’d Luke speeder added to the shot. However the SE also added a large dome like building in the background among a few other new additions that are not present when they arrive at the cantina even in the SE. So assuming this was meant to be a part of Mos Eisley they had already passed before arriving at the cantina, it also serves a bit of a continuity error in the original as well.

Post
#1042139
Topic
Most pointless Special Edition change?
Time

Wazzles said:

Oh! Oh! I have one! The recomped crawl in Star Wars! Why didn’t they just use the 81 crawl? It’s just as good as the 97.

True. I never really understood why the SW logo had to recede faster in the SE. The only thing I do like that the SE crawl did was begin to roll up before the SW logo faded out. At least that way it fits with the other episodes.

Post
#1040845
Topic
Star Wars 1992 VHS styled DVD covers
Time

crissrudd4554 said:

EyeShotFirst, is there a reason you forgot the image of Yoda on the back cover of ESB?? Also this was discussed in another thread but does anyone by any chance have a logofree version of the ROTJ artwork but with the ‘smaller’ Lando like on the VHS cover?? The only logofree version of that artwork that I can find has ‘larger’ Lando.

Anyone here who can help find that ‘smaller Lando’ print of the ROTJ artwork?? Also does anyone happen to have any large scans of the back covers of these UK covers?? They seem to be the best source for textless or close to textless copies of the '92 back cover collages. Thanks!!



Post
#1040399
Topic
Most pointless Special Edition change?
Time

TV’s Frink said:

crissrudd4554 said:

I saw the SE of ANH in the theatre but I was 4 so I honestly don’t remember it much so my first proper introduction to the OUT in Widescreen was when I got the '92 Letterboxed VHS set off eBay about 14 years ago.

TV’s Frink said:

crissrudd4554 said:

If you had the Pan and Scan version of the SE

No one should have.

What if I had said this?? ‘If you had the Pan and Scan version of the OUT–’

No one should have unless you had no choice.

Which in 2004 if you wanted them on DVD no one did, unless you had bootlegged copies sourced from LDs.

Post
#1040050
Topic
Most pointless Special Edition change?
Time

I saw the SE of ANH in the theatre but I was 4 so I honestly don’t remember it much so my first proper introduction to the OUT in Widescreen was when I got the '92 Letterboxed VHS set off eBay about 14 years ago.

TV’s Frink said:

crissrudd4554 said:

If you had the Pan and Scan version of the SE

No one should have.

What if I had said this?? ‘If you had the Pan and Scan version of the OUT–’