logo Sign In

adywan

User Group
Members
Join date
15-Mar-2006
Last activity
25-Jun-2025
Posts
5,179

Post History

Post
#337987
Topic
THE STAR WARS SAGA - 1080P AVCHD DVD-9 for PS3 & Blu-Ray players - Episodes 1, 4 & 5 available now
Time
darthflan said:

Hey Ady, sounds like you need another 1TB drive. They run for under 100 bucks now on new egg. Thats how Im saving all my stuff on my media center. I've got 4 now :D

 

THANK YOU! for the big .mkv

 

Cant wait for this bad boy.....heading over to a.b.sw right now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Is there a discernible difference in the 14gb file in picture quality?

Flan

The picture is pretty much the same quality, but of course the larger one will have the edge due to double the bitrate. But the 14gb version won't be posted until next weekend. But don't download the files already posted. Await the repack coming shortly. There was a problem with the audio which i didn't notice until after i had begun the post. The one to get will be started later today

 

Post
#337982
Topic
VHS VCR with USB output!
Time

I wouldn't waste your money on one of these machines. They have them in my local Maplin stores. i asked for a demonstration and i was totally unimpressed. the picture quality was well below even old model VHS standard. The capturing software, on their demo dual core intel machine was horrid, dropping many frames as it captured. The audio was only mono and the hiss was really bad and sounded distorted.

Post
#337976
Topic
THE STAR WARS SAGA - 1080P AVCHD DVD-9 for PS3 & Blu-Ray players - Episodes 1, 4 & 5 available now
Time
Wookie Groomer said:
adywan said:

there will also be a higher bitrate mkv version coming shortly after too? It should be about 14GB in size

That has my attention. Nice to see some attention given to those that appreciate better quality than bitrate starved DVD9's. Too bad your A New Hope didn't see the same appreciation. I'm really looking forward to that 14GB version of Empire!

 

Well ANH was going to get a high bitrate mkv version but i ran out of space, with doing ESB Revisited at the same time and i needed to clear out a few un-needed files. unfortunately i accidently deleted the folder with the lossless avi of ANH so that one will never see the light of day anymore. i was totaly gutted.

 

Post
#337942
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Darth Solo said:

There you go gavin.

Its because we're all holding our breaths in antici.............pation, as to what comes next, so to say 77. Its the calm before the storm(and adys finalising the 1080P AVCHD of Empire at the moment)! Or perhaps, we've just burnt out with the ideas already? No?

Ha ha. A Rocky Horror reference there.

I should be posting some of the things i'm intending to do with ESB:R soon, so watch this space.

 

Post
#337930
Topic
THE STAR WARS SAGA - 1080P AVCHD DVD-9 for PS3 &amp; Blu-Ray players - Episodes 1, 4 &amp; 5 available now
Time

Well the rendering is done and it looks pretty good. i've decided to keep the framerate at 23.976 instead of 24fps because some older TVs can't handle 24kz so this one should be more compatible. So here is the specs for ESB AVCHD:

1080p 23.976fps
AC3 5.1 @ 640kbps English laserdisc audio
AC3 2.0 commentaries
English subtitles

Its less than a day away :)

Post
#337820
Topic
Empire Strikes Back 70mm
Time
Vaderisnothayden said:

When was the 70mm completed? Before or after opening day?

Also, are you sure the 35mm was the more complete later-made version? Because it actually had less lines, most notably the "thanks threepio", but also some other small bits.

Yes, the 35mm was the later -made version. it is pretty well documented that GL ordered a few extra FX shots and some changes but as the 70mm version was already complete and printed it would have been too expensive to have redone all those prints. That is why there are different lines as it had an earlier mix.

 

Post
#337779
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
jlw515 said:

3. I too did not like that Chewie had a medal, simply because it just miraculously appears.

Jason

If you look at that scene closely again you will see i added an extra shot of leia preparing the medal and chewie steps forward in the right hand side of the frame, then we cut to Luke as she gives it chewie. So it doesn't miraculously appear. Its a quick shot so easy to miss on first viewing.

Post
#337735
Topic
THE STAR WARS SAGA - 1080P AVCHD DVD-9 for PS3 &amp; Blu-Ray players - Episodes 1, 4 &amp; 5 available now
Time
Ripplin said:

Neat-o! Seems to have gone fairly smoothly. Yes/no?

Why are our posts all in bold letters? :p

I don't know. It happened after strongbot posted

Well the laserdisc audio was a bit of a nightmare to synch but apart from that things have gone pretty smoothly..... i just hope i haven't jinxed it now.

 

Post
#337595
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
vbangle said:

Hey Ady,

With the AVCHD version will the transparent hoth scenes be fixed? or is that something to be done only in the revisited version?

 

 

No. the AVCHD version will be the original 1997 theatrical version, complete with original Emperor and even the flipped insignias on the officers uniforms at the end of the movie.

after doing the colour correction i have noticed that almost all the FX shots, including those in space , are transparent. It was definitely the start of ILM doing the "we can  do it this way now so lets do everything this way" scenario. why the hell the falcon is transparent in front of the stardestroyers is just silly. and you can see the TIES through the falcon at times too

 

Post
#337573
Topic
Extended original cut of first film released way back?
Time
Baronlando said:

So now the "secret cut" was on TV? In the 80s? The cut that's being "covered up"? Get real. Star Wars was EXCLUSIVE to pay tv and then network TV throughout the 80s, at huge cost. They didn't make  a "special secret one for broadcast in the bay area", geezus. This is getting ridonkulous.

 

I know. its all getting a bit conspiracy theorist now isn't it. What next? Princess Diana wasn't killed in an accident but was in fact killed because he had a copy of the "secret cut"?. lmao

Don't TV stations get sent copies of the movies for transmition? And wouldn't all the copies be the same transfer? So why only the Bay area got to see this scene then? Utter rubbish

Post
#337559
Topic
Extended original cut of first film released way back?
Time
Hunter6 said:
Vaderisnothayden said:

Say for a moment that Hunter6 was right and an extended print did get some showings, does anybody have any idea why it might have been released?.


This is what I heard about this Extended cut. it was a rough cut of the film and copies were made to show to investers. The rough cut copies somehow turned up at some theaters and then were pulled. This is something I can not proof (I can not pull this Extended cut of the film out and say here you go) , but you have so many witness accounts vs Lucasfilm's words.

The double throw grappling hook scene:
Here is a little help, The double throw grappling hook scene was shown on channel 4 (kron/NBC) in bay area, back in the mid-80's in their TV version at 9:00pm. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                adywan said:
                 The Marvel comics didn't see an early cut of the film at all.

                then, adywan said:
                There. The previews were only shown in private to a select audience (fox & Marvel among them)


adywan keep up the looking into this becuase you seem to be disproofing your veiw. :)

 

Hunter6, maybe you should read what i posted properly before trying to make me look like a dick. i was saying that Marvel didn't see a cut of the film at all when doing the comic when i was replying to you when you said that Marvel must have seen an early cut of the film because these scenes ended up in the comics.  Roy Thomas only saw a cut of the film AFTER the comics had been finished and had already been released.

And where is the actual evidence that this was shown on that station in the mid '80's? surely there should be some visual evidence. Video recorders were around at this time yet this clip has never surfaced.

Post
#337527
Topic
Extended original cut of first film released way back?
Time
Vaderisnothayden said:
adywan said:

Ok direct from starwars.com:

There. the Jabba scenes were never finished and never in any version of the movie. So how could these people have seen it in this extended cut? one urban myth ended.

and about the Biggs footage:

http://www.starwarsholidayspecial.com/swcs/episode4/Biggs.html

accept it. this whole "extended cut" of star wars never existed. It is just an urban myth.

I know the official account that the Jabba scene wasn't in the final cut because Lucas couldn't get the creature for it, but I don't trust that account. See my first post on this page. I address reasons for questioning that account. It's not that I think the scene was in there, but when there's any reason to doubt the account and people are claiming to have seen it, questions are raised.

Re the Biggs footage, that article only addresses the Tatooine Biggs scene, not the Yavin one which the Star Wars Unauthorized Compendium says was in the film.

Also, the article claims the Biggs Tatooine scene was never shown in public, but on what are they basing that claim? The previous thing you posted implied that scene WAS shown in public at previews and was only deleted after the previews, so I don't know if we can trust the claim that it was never shown in public. Also, they say the sound mix wasn't finished and the scene was only in rough cuts. But if they're wrong about it being shown in public they could be wrong about that. And I don't know, maybe somehow a roough cut could have gotten out.

I don't mean to be a pain in the ass about this, I'm just concerned with what happened and I don't see justification for dismissing these claims outright. The official accounts can be wrong and I don't trust Lucas and co.

Thanks for the info, anyway. :)

You seem to be totally misreading what i posted. The article never said it was shown in public. it was a private preview screening which was for "Hollywood heavies", which was the fox execs and also the guy from Marvel. it clearly states it was in Lucas' private screening room. You need to read that again. No where does it say it was shown to the public.

If you read it the screening in the first quote was a very rough one and it mentioned that the scene with Biggs and Luke friends had been cut. Maybe in this one the other 2 biggs scenes ( where he tells him that's he is going to join the rebels and the Yavin temple scene) were intact. but the second one seems to be a final screening and then the rest of the Biggs scenes were cut. It all fits.

The novel & the Marvel comic had these scenes, including the grappling hook, intact. the illustrated storybook had pictures of the opening tredwell scene and biggs on Tatooine. Then the Radio play brought these scenes to life (apart from the grappling hook). the evidence is all there that its a myth, but it seems to me that even if hard evidence is produced then some people still wouldn't believe it.

 

Post
#337522
Topic
Extended original cut of first film released way back?
Time

Ok direct from starwars.com:

Before he became the fat loathsome slug that we recognize Jabba as in Return of the Jedi, Jabba was referred to as a "Hut," and looked quite different. In the 1977 version of A New Hope, there was to be a confrontation between Han Solo and Jabba that was filmed, but it was never completed to make the final release.

The script establishes Jabba to be a large, repulsive creature, an effect that George Lucas could not realize at the time. He is described as a "fat, slug-like creature with eyes on extended feelers and a huge ugly mouth." The scene was filmed with a stand-in actor, Declan Mulholland. It would be over 20 years later that this scene was finally completed. The Special Edition of A New Hope featured a computer-generated Jabba replacement for Mulholland.

In the Marvel Comics adaptation of Star Wars, the confrontation remains intact, but Jabba is a tall humanoid with a walrus-like face, a scraggly topknot, and a bright uniform. The Marvel artists used a variation of Mosep, one of Jabba's underlings, glimpsed as an extra in the Mos Eisley scenes.

There. the Jabba scenes were never finished and never in any version of the movie. So how could these people have seen it in this extended cut? one urban myth ended.

and about the Biggs footage:

http://www.starwarsholidayspecial.com/swcs/episode4/Biggs.html

accept it. this whole "extended cut" of star wars never existed. It is just an urban myth.

Post
#337515
Topic
Extended original cut of first film released way back?
Time

Ok well maybe this will shed some light on all this:

From Starlog #120, July 1987: 

This issue was dedicated to the 10th anniversary of "Star Wars." In
it, there is an article by Roy Thomas entitled, "How I Learned to Stop
Worrying and Love 'Star Wars' (Within Limits)" (nice "Strangelove"
homage), which features his recollections of working on the "Star
Wars" comics for Marvel.

"...anyhow, soon Howard, Steve and I were sitting in the front row in
George's private screening room while the Hollywood heavies slouched
further back with George, and the rough cut began.
It opened with a 'crawl' of copy meant to suggest the old Flash
Gordon serials that had influenced the movie. But this was NOT the
crawl with which moviegoers are now familiar, nor was there any 'Long
ago, in a galaxy far, far away' lead-in. Rather, the crawl consisted
of totally different copy telling the movie's backstory. (If you want
to know what it said, all you have to do is pick up a back issue of
Marvel's "Star Wars" #1, since the caption there was taken from that
original crawl. George evidently had last-minute thoughts and changed
it just before the opening. In fact, one ILM worker told me that the
story was that, on opening day, George would probably be in the
projection booth at Mann's, pasting on some last bit of film.) [NOTE:
Original crawl text follows this entry.]

Original opening crawl as published in the Marvel adaption of "Star
Wars" #1:

"It is a period of CIVIL WAR in the galaxy. A brave Alliance of
UNDERGROUND FREEDOM FIGHTERS has challenged the tyranny and oppression
of the awesome GALACTIC EMPIRE. To crush the rebellion once and for
all, the EMPIRE is constructing a sinister new BATTLE STATION.
Powerful enough to destroy an entire planet, its COMPLETION will spell
CERTAIN DOOM for the champions of freedom. Striking from a fortress
hidden among the billion stars of the galaxy, REBEL SPACESHIPS have
won their first victory in a battle with the powerful IMPERIAL
STARFLEET. The Empire fears that ANOTHER defeat could bring a THOUSAND
MORE solar systems into the rebellion, and IMPERIAL CONTROL over the
galaxy would be LOST FOREVER."

Then in came the spaceships. Even in the rough cut and on a
relatively small screen, it was an impressive beginning, and I was
only moderately surprised months later at Mann's Chinese to hear the
shocked gasp of the audience when Big Ship came after Little Ship.
Next, the fight: stormtroopers vs. rebels. But there were no rays
zipping back and forth across the screen in San Anselmo. Just the
flicker of hand-drawn arrows on the film, to show where the FX would
go.
Soon, Darth Vader came on and began to speak--with a British
accent. (This was actor David Prowse's own voice, before James Earl
Jones' sepulchral tones were laid in.)
The movie went on. I noted with chagrin that one scene in the
script--between Luke and some childhood chums, near the beginning--had
been CUT, though it was currently being printed in the comic's first
issue. (And a few irate readers would later castigate us for inserting
things into 'George's Movie.')"

From Screen Superstar magazine #8, "Star Wars: the Full Story," 1977:

"His editors, including his wife, Marcia (Lucas' daughters had earlier
appeared in the film as Jawas), had put together a rough cut. With
Lucas they trimmed it down to preview size. And the previews were VERY
successful. Excitement spread at Twentieth, and through the movie
colony--Lucas had a winner!
But winner or not, Lucas still wasn't entirely satisfied. The
film ran for over two hours (123 minutes), and Lucas wanted maximum
audience turnover. Thus, the film had to be UNDER two hours, so back
went Lucas and the editors, and six minutes of Biggs Darklighter,
Luke's boyhood pal and fellow rebel pilot, were trashed. The film was
finished."

There. The previews were only shown in private to a select audience (fox & Marvel among them)and even when before Vaders voice and the crawl we all know was finished, including any laser FX and others, all the Biggs scenes were cut. No one would have seen these scenes at the cinema. If they did then they would have heard Dave Prowse's voice as Vader, and no one mentioned that. As you can see from the article the comic was out before the movie was even finished and the first version he saw was the final rough cut and was surprised that all the Biggs scenes were cut. he said he was surprised because they were in the script and not that he had already seen them. Marvel worked from a script to produce the comic and never saw the movie prior to doing the comic. Also, in the comic, Han never met Jabba but instead had a conversation with a different creature. If Jabba had been in the film and the Marvel guys had seen a cut of the film with him in surely he would have been a human?

The comic and the novel came out months before ANH was released at the cinema. Also how old were the people who say they saw these scenes in 1977? Its exactly the same as people who swear they saw some X-wings with blue stripes and that there was comlink chatter from blue squadron. It was in the novels, along with the double grappling throw, that was never in the movie at all.

It's all just an urban myth.

Vaderisnothayden said:

adywan said:

Hasn't this already been debunked because it was never even filmed? So how the hell could they have seen it? It was the same with ESB when people swore that they saw the Wampa drag Luke off and attack the rebel base. Yet again they scrapped that idea during filming so how the hell would it end up finished in a theatre showing?

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_scenes_cut_from_Star_Wars_Episode_V:_The_Empire_Strikes_Back

It looks like some of those scenes were filmed. They've got photos there of Luke manning a gun in the base, seemingly against wampas and a tauntaun dead in the base seemingly killed by wampas.

ESB was a different thing all together. The 70mm version and the 35mm were different, with the 70mm version being slightly shorter. The 35mm was the final cut, with a few extra shots and some differing fx, audio and wipes. This i saw, along with many other people and has been documented. Strangely enough, if you think about it, the 70mm version is actually the original, with the 35mm which we all know and love is actually a special edition. lol

See here:

http://www.in70mm.com/news/2003/empire/index.htm

It sounds from that like the 70mm was the final version. That's the version they used for the SE I think. It has a few extra lines.

that shot of luke is just a publicity photo and wasn't to be part of the movie. the wampas attacked the base while Luke was recovering in the medical bay early in the movie (may have even been before Han found Luke, but i haven't got the original script or the novel at hand at the moment). The creature just didn't work and the idea was scrapped during filming, so although scenes were shot hoping that they could fix the wampa problem these scenes never made it into any released cut of the movie.

And only some audio differences were used from the 70mm for the SE. the 70mm wasn't the final version as Lucas ordered a few extra fx shots of the falcon at the end amongst others. The 70mm was the first version with the 35mm being the final version, prior to 1977

 

Post
#337496
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
The Golden Idol said:

Anyways, Ady, what are you working on now?

 

I'm really looking forward to seeing that "Yoda with CGI emotes" test clip. Is it coming soon?

 

Just putting the finishing touches to the colour correction. I have about 15 or so shots left to do. Hopefully it will be finished by the end of next week and the 1080p AVCHD version should be out a short time after. I won't be doing any FX work until after Christmas because i still need to plan a few things out and Christmas is a pretty busy time for me, so no new shots until the New Year.

Post
#337494
Topic
Hold me like you did by the lake on Naboo... barf
Time
rcb said:

i believe anakin was twenty, while padme was twenty four.

 i think george was trying to go back to like a romeo and juliet or some type of shakespear in the movie. if you've read the novel for episode I, anakin says he's one day gonna marry padme. what the hell is that? that is the corniest line for a ten year old and i'm glad it wasn't in the movie.

I also agree with rcb that GL was going for the Romeo & Juliet style for their romance. Just listen to the dialogue and the way it is spoken in the fireplace scene. very Shakespearean in its tone.