- Post
- #192138
- Topic
- DVD Labels
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192138/action/topic#192138
- Time

Zion
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 23-Sep-2004
- Last activity
- 8-Jul-2025
- Posts
- 1,995
Post History
- Post
- #192136
- Topic
- DVD Labels
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192136/action/topic#192136
- Time
- Post
- #192127
- Topic
- New forum software status - updated 1/4/2006
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192127/action/topic#192127
- Time
- Post
- #192103
- Topic
- DVD Labels
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192103/action/topic#192103
- Time
- Post
- #192099
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Superbit?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192099/action/topic#192099
- Time
- Post
- #192098
- Topic
- DVD Labels
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192098/action/topic#192098
- Time
Originally posted by: THX
Zion, I'm about to do the same - where are you getting your disc art from?
Zion, I'm about to do the same - where are you getting your disc art from?
Well, I initially started out trying to track down all the "official" labels for each set. But I soon realized that not all sets had labels, and not all labels included the set name. The latter is crucial for someone like me who isn't going to be printing any covers. I'm keeping all my DVDs in a 300-disc zip wallet, and I need to be able to flip through, locate the set I'm looking for, and then locate the title. So I came up with my own labels:



With these templates, all I do is change the name and add the appropriate logos to the bottom (PCM, Letterbox, etc.). I don't have to guess which set is which, and I can quickly find what I'm looking for.
- Post
- #192028
- Topic
- Teenage Muntant Ninja Turtles
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192028/action/topic#192028
- Time
Originally posted by: theredbaron
The PC version pissed me off. I swear black and blue it was rigged...
But it's all about the journey, right? *grumble grumble grumble*
The PC version pissed me off. I swear black and blue it was rigged...
But it's all about the journey, right? *grumble grumble grumble*
Tell me more about this PC version. I've never heard of it. Is it the same game as TMNT 1 on NES?
- Post
- #192022
- Topic
- New forum software status - updated 1/4/2006
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192022/action/topic#192022
- Time
- Post
- #192018
- Topic
- .: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/192018/action/topic#192018
- Time
- Post
- #191970
- Topic
- .: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/191970/action/topic#191970
- Time
- Post
- #191924
- Topic
- .: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/191924/action/topic#191924
- Time
Arnie, sorry for the delay in responding, but I think the newsletter answers most of your questions. Yes, there are multiple captures, and yes we are working on TooTed versions of all of them.
- Post
- #191867
- Topic
- Rankings
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/191867/action/topic#191867
- Time
I'm such a spammer.
- Post
- #191865
- Topic
- DVD Labels
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/191865/action/topic#191865
- Time
I recently purchased an Epson R200 printer ($65 on clearance) and a CIS ink kit. It was more money than I wanted to spend, for sure, but it beats stick on labels any day as well as the "sharpie" method. I'm in the process of printing labels for my entire SW DVD preservation & fan edits collection, as well as my 36-disc MST3K collection. I'm about 1/3 of the way done with printing them all, and I've barely even used 1/10 of the 4oz. ink bottles I got with my CIS kit. It was a lot of cash up front, but in the long run I'm saving a lot of money over using regular ink cartridges, or stick on labels for that matter.
I haven't tried using any coating spray though, as my dorm room isn't the most ideal place to be spraying chemicals everywhere. I've also heard that sprays can get onto the data side of the disc and damage it if you're not careful. How true is this?
- Post
- #191607
- Topic
- OT.com fan edit blog: your thoughts please (Update: development underway)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/191607/action/topic#191607
- Time
- Release Date
- Average Bit Rate
- Subtitles
- Available Menus (Main, Chapter, Audio, etc.)
- Menu Screenshots
- Encoder used (CCE, etc.)
- Laserdisc player used
- Capture card used
- Capture software used
- Post
- #191184
- Topic
- Help: looking for Cowclops v.2 DVD Covers? Summary thread?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/191184/action/topic#191184
- Time
- Post
- #191137
- Topic
- hot like fire thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/191137/action/topic#191137
- Time
- Post
- #190772
- Topic
- hot like fire thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190772/action/topic#190772
- Time
- Post
- #190746
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Has anyone yet done an Episode 3 fan edit?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190746/action/topic#190746
- Time
- Post
- #190742
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Superbit?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190742/action/topic#190742
- Time
Originally posted by: digitalfreaknyc
Laserdiscs aren't compressed AT ALL. That's what makes them sound great.
Laserdiscs aren't compressed AT ALL. That's what makes them sound great.
Actually, Dolby Digital and DTS tracks on laserdisc are compressed, as gltaylor noted above. Only stereo and mono audio on LDs is uncompressed.
- Post
- #190495
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Superbit?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190495/action/topic#190495
- Time
Originally posted by: gltaylor74
I always felt that ld basically used the theatrical mix whereas DVD's are often "remixed" for home theater. When comparing the Star Wars Episode I DD DVD (at 448kbps) to the DD on the LD (at 384kbps) it is no contest. The LD is far more agressive of a mix and faithfully represents the theatrical viewing experience that I had. The DVD sounds "dumbed down" so to speak.
I have not compared the DD to the DTS on the R2 Jurassic park superbit. I know that the DTS is only at a rate of 754kbps and does not use the full 1509kbps as some early DTS DVD's did. DTS laserdisc for reference used a bitrate of 1235kbps. I remeber that when the R1 Jurassic park came out, the DTS DVD was very very weak and was easily bested by the DD DVD. It was found that an encoding error occured on the DTS DVD and cut it's LFE channel by 4db. A repressed DTS DVD was made available that was said to be created from the DTS laserdisc master and it shows. I believe that the Jurassic park superbit DTS is this same mix as it sounds very similar to the DTS DVD.
I always felt that ld basically used the theatrical mix whereas DVD's are often "remixed" for home theater. When comparing the Star Wars Episode I DD DVD (at 448kbps) to the DD on the LD (at 384kbps) it is no contest. The LD is far more agressive of a mix and faithfully represents the theatrical viewing experience that I had. The DVD sounds "dumbed down" so to speak.
I have not compared the DD to the DTS on the R2 Jurassic park superbit. I know that the DTS is only at a rate of 754kbps and does not use the full 1509kbps as some early DTS DVD's did. DTS laserdisc for reference used a bitrate of 1235kbps. I remeber that when the R1 Jurassic park came out, the DTS DVD was very very weak and was easily bested by the DD DVD. It was found that an encoding error occured on the DTS DVD and cut it's LFE channel by 4db. A repressed DTS DVD was made available that was said to be created from the DTS laserdisc master and it shows. I believe that the Jurassic park superbit DTS is this same mix as it sounds very similar to the DTS DVD.
I must've had the repressed DTS version then because it sounded amazing. Someone stole the disc out of my disc wallet though.

I wonder if it's an increased dynamic range that makes the LD sound so good?
- Post
- #190459
- Topic
- hot like fire thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190459/action/topic#190459
- Time
- Post
- #190357
- Topic
- Violence in Video games a fad?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190357/action/topic#190357
- Time
- Post
- #190352
- Topic
- Kirby Puckett Dead at 44
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190352/action/topic#190352
- Time
- Post
- #190341
- Topic
- Violence in Video games a fad?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190341/action/topic#190341
- Time
There have been plenty of horrible violent video games made. Ever since Mortal Kombat hit the arcades back in the early 90's, there have been a ton of crappy games of the same genre. Primal Rage comes to mind as being one of the more controversial, as well as a SegaCD game called Night Trap (I think) - the one where you could break into houses and rape women.
- Post
- #190314
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Superbit?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/190314/action/topic#190314
- Time
However, if you compare a soundtrack mastered by DTS to a soundtrack mastered by Dolby, there can be distict differences. If anyone out there has both a copy of the DD version of Jurassic Park and the DTS version, compare the audio of the opening credits. I used to demo this for people when I worked at Circuit City. There's a part in the opening credits of the film where the bass kicks in with a solid "boom". In the DTS version, the bass is tight and solid. On the DD version, the bass is very weak and sounds muddy. The chirps of the birds and wind instruments are also much clearer on the DTS version. Is this the same case with your Superbit DVD gl?