x5gb said:
Can someone explain what's wrong with newsgroups, longetivity is like 6 years, no need for anyone to seed. Is it to do with cost or something else.
I'm not paying for a newsgroup subscription. I've openly stated I'd be willing to help pay for a seedbox, or to help with other issues as they arise, and I've helped pay for for the Back-up HDD in the past as well. At this point I'd rather just straight up purchase completed projects for $20-$25 a piece than have to pay for for a newsgroup subscription. I think if distribution is going to be a problem, creating a "Safe List" of known contributors/donors/members might be a safe guaranteed alternative.
I don't know what happened at BT, but if the point is to have a free and safe location to share projects, I don't see why we wouldn't continue to use that location if it's available to us regardless of whether we have administrative access or special privileges. When that relationship began, no one was looking for special privileges, extra content, to stream films online, or even to be treated as a VIP... All anyone wanted was to simply find a fast and safe place to share the projects. Something BT fit to a T. This site has always been the primary discussion location to discuss these projects, so even having access to a forum or conversations isn't necessary anywhere else.
Furthermore, it's been stated on numerous occasions in the past when there was no central location for the files to be shared, that people were free to upload/share TeamBlu's projects anywhere/everywhere, as long as proper credit is given. What has changed that now we are being discouraged from using what is essentially the safest and fastest service everyone has access to? Was whatever that went down so bad that we need to walkaway from everything? This seems to punish all the wrong people. Wouldn't a better option be to continue to utilize the infrastructure there and to continue to release projects while just avoiding all other aspects of the site?
We don't need a custom designed forum and special features to essentially share a link that guides us to a file. Why not continue to utilize what's available to us while looking for other options and just not use the site for any other reason?
Ultimately I'm not a member of TeamBlu, so I have no say or impact on what the group ultimately decides to do, what I am however is a very big supporter of the work that they do and someone that has, and will continue to contribute in any way that he can. As long as I can continue to find a way to access the projects they release, I'll make do, but it seems a shame to deny so many folks that are interested in these projects a means to get them easily when the infrastructure is already in place, but a conscious decision to not use that infrastructure has been made because of hard feelings between a few people. Maybe what happened between TeamBlu and BT was bad enough to warrant this decision, I'll never know, but I've been a part of enough message boards, and forum feuds of the past 16 years to know that giving up a sure fire thing because of a disagreement/personal conflict between members never benefits anyone.