logo Sign In

Tobar

User Group
Moderators
Join date
13-Sep-2006
Last activity
15-Jul-2025
Posts
5,340

Post History

Post
#1061134
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Alderaan said:

oojason said:

I’m not 100% sure what you are referring to in your post?

Sorry, I thought my post was more clear. The magic crystal thing is not Star Wars. You won’t find **** like that in the original three movies. Some creatively challenged animated TV-writer of limited ability, or some creatively challenged EU author of limited writing ability, came up with it out of his ***, and Disney’s creatively bankrupt hacks decided to borrow it, as they are accustomed to doing.

Well…

The Force is all around us. It can be collected and transmitted through the use of a Kiber Crystal. It’s the only way to amplify the power of the Force within you. - Ben Kenobi, in “The Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Starkiller, Third-Draft, August 1975”

The idea of the Kaiburr crystal can be traced to the earliest incarnations of the script for Star Wars; specifically, the May 1, 1975 “Story Synopsis and Typed Outline” from “The Adventures of Luke Starkiller (episode one) ‘The Star Wars’.” There it was spelled as a “Kiber Crystal” and acted as a MacGuffin, or device driving the story, for the heroes to capture. Ben Kenobi was intended to explain to Luke Skywalker how the Kiber Crystal collected the Force and allowed the wielder to use it. Eventually, in a later edition of the draft, “The Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Starkiller, Third-Draft, August 1975,” the plot was expanded to include Kenobi attempting to capture his personal Kiber Crystal from the “Crystal Chamber” on the Imperial throne world of Alderaan. The elder Jedi would explain how it had been taken from him during the Battle of Condawn—the same battle in which Skywalker’s father died—by one of Kenobi’s disciples. The few crystals that remained were held in the Alderaanian Crystal Chamber. Later, Skywalker was to utilize the crystal in his fight with Darth Vader.

Pretty simple really.

Post
#1060631
Topic
Last comic read
Time

Lando #1-5

Up to now I’ve been incredibly disappointed with Marvel’s modern take on Star Wars. They’ve been a huge disappointment that has had me yearning for the Dark Horse days.

After a very long break I decided it was time to try again. Lando is my first dip back in and it’s a promising one.

They did a very fine job of capturing the essence of Lando and I very much enjoyed this new take on Lobot. I like to imagine he has a Northern English accent. There’s a decent plot here but nothing too exciting.

It still has some annoying bits that don’t really fit in this universe but they’re kept to a minimum. Hopefully the other mini-series can at least maintain this level of quality. Once I’ve burned through them I’ll be left with nothing but the Main line and Darth Vader. Blech.

Post
#1058953
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

ENEMY MINE (1985)

Finally was able to get a hold of a copy of this on blu-ray. Absolutely wonderful film! Everything came together just right for it. Outstanding writing, directing and performances from everyone involved. The transfer on this blu-ray is fantastic, sharp clear picture and good color. All of the effects by ILM still hold up very well. It’s such a shame that this film was never appreciated in its time and is mostly forgotten today. If you’ve never seen it, I highly recommend it!

Post
#1058330
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Density said:

Don’t kid yourself into thinking it’s all on the filmmakers. The formula is specifically designed so that their films are indistinguishable from one another. Quick, without cheating, who directed Captain America: Civil War? You don’t know and you don’t care because it doesn’t matter. It’s a product first and a film second.

Not that you were asking me but the Russo Brothers. I know that because I do care and so do they. They’re doing far greater things with Marvel than Joss Whedon did with the characters.

Marvel puts a lot of faith in their filmmakers. They’ve had hiccups in the past (Edgar Wright) but on the whole they rely a lot on the directors they hire to set the tone and direction of their individual films.

Guardians of the Galaxy is without a doubt, a James Gunn film. Thor: Ragnarok is shaping up to be a thoroughly Taika Waititi film with all the funny quirks that entails.

Likewise, the Russos are proving to be very capable at creating Action Thrillers.

There are the occasional paint by the numbers productions that pop up but to say that all of the MCU is the same is patently false.

Post
#1057206
Topic
<strong>STAR WARS: REBELS</strong> (animated tv series) - a general discussion thread
Time

Swazzy said:

DominicCobb said:

Swazzy said:

Seeing both a Jedi and a Sith simultaneously believe they’d find redemption through Vader was awesome, and was yet another example of “things I hate about the PT that are mostly alright in this context”.

I didn’t think they were talking about Vader.

Likely it was kept intentionally ambiguous.

There’s nothing really ambiguous about it.

Maul: Oh, you have a purpose here. Perhaps you are…protecting something? No…protecting someone.
Maul: Tell me…is it the Chosen One?
Kenobi: He is.
Maul: He. Will. Avenge us