TV's Frink

C3PX said:

McDonald's Arch Deluxe - (not a big fan of McDonald's, but that was a great burger... as far as piss-poor quality fast food goes)

I already talked about the Arch Deluxe...except it was called the McDLT!

Wiki said:

The McDLT was eventually succeeded by the McLean Deluxe in 1991. The McLean deluxe was a lower fat sandwich that included carrageenan to replace the beef fat in the patty and a low calorie mayonnaise.^[4] While the sandwich tested well, it failed to catch on after the national roll-out and was discontinued in 1996 in favor of the new Arch Deluxe,^[4] an adult oriented sandwich that featured a higher quality roll and a dijon mustard based mayonnaise. This sandwich was also unsuccessful and was discontinued in 1998.^[5]

I'm not sure about it being an "Adult Sandwich."

C3PX said:

People actually having to meet face to face in order to socialize

Yeah!  Let's boycott OT.com! ;-)

McDLT:

Keeps the hot side hot and the cool side cool.

2nd generation ishuffle. 

The new one with the stupid volume control on the headphones sucks feral donkey bawls.

Awesome thread idea, BTW.  But it's going to make me feel old (see next post).

It comes in a cane.

Sheesh.

xhonzi said:

Aren't you on la probation?

Ah, interesting point.

Please see New Rule #15.

OVERRULED!!!

I don't know enough French.

Thread is still open...

ABC said:

I have not reposted, I quoted.

Nice try, but doesn't matter.  Please refer to revised Rule #3.

ABC said:

THIS THREAD IS NOW ABOUT WOMEN FIGHTS (with no boobs, and with gran'mas clothes), I said.

OVERRULED!

Please refer to New Rule #14.

Thread is still open...

I just add my cane sugar to the regular Dr. Pepper.  Don't see what the big deal is.

ABC said:

Hey, there are no boobs at large, man !

Other than you?

<rimshot>

As I said, you obviously didn't read Rule #3.  Allow me to reprint for your benefit:

The Rules said:

3) Threads cannot be about certain subjects.  I'm sure you can figure out most of them, for instance, no boobies.  Incidentally, it will not be a beautiful woman thread either, 'cause I don't want to have to worry about my wife wondering why I'm staring at a bunch of beautiful women.  Handsome men are ok, however.  She's reasonably sure I'm not gay, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Yeah, those women are beautiful, so you violated Rule #3.  And guess what?  Since you reposted the picture, you did it again.

HALL OF SHAME!

You've gone from PURGATORY to PARDON to HALL OF SHAME in mere hours.

Yes, the thread is still open *sigh*

You should probably now remove the "reward" part from the thread title...

See, there you go, you're starting to get a sense of humor about yourself.  Frankly, I think you were asking for it, walking around with your leg uncovered and all.

Admit it, for just a brief second as you typed your response, you had an image of Professor Frink humping your leg.

Apparently, you didn't read Rule #3.

PROBATION!!!

I'm thinking of renaming the first level of punishment "PROBATION SPONSORED BY ABC."  Anyway, I think it goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway:

THE THREAD IS STILL OPEN!

I'm on this side of those wishing to leave the lightsaber colors alone, unless there's a really good reason for it (for instance, changing Dooku's color so he's no longer a Sith).  However, let's keep in mind two things:

1) This is the Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread

2) Any ideas that are put into play will be done thru a fanedit.  As such, if you think something is a bad idea, say so, then let it go.  You don't have to watch the edit.

Vaderisnothayden said:

You know, Frink, you're like one of these little dogs that follow people around barking frantically at their heels. Following me around the boards trying to get my attention.

I wonder why, VINH.  Perhaps your leg looks like a fire hydrant?  Whatever the reason is, it probably has nothing to do with your attitude.

Back on topic again, I'll mention one of the things I found hilarous in the presentation.  I love the purposeful mispronouncing of names and words, as well as the poor editing.  And even though it's an easy joke, I always enjoy the "oh wait, never mind" bit as he shows a clip that contradicts his supposed point.

Well...

Time's up, Nanner.

HALL OF SHAME!!!

And what the hell, I'm feeling generous.  FULL PARDON to everyone else!

More news...New Rule #13.

And finally...

THE THREAD IS NOW OPEN!!!

xhonzi said:

Superman 3 was great when you were 6!  And before you knew anything about computers.

Don't be rude.  You know that's how computers worked back then.

ABC said:

... Me Too !

Second time posting that picture, but I really laughed this time.  Nice work!  And so...

FULL PARDON!

Please see new Rule #12.

Naaaaanerrr.......come out and plaaaaayyyy!

(tick tick tick)

Ooh, this is hotter than chessboxing.

Vaderisnothayden said:

Chewtobacca said:

You defend yourself over-aggressively, so I've no wish to talk to you further.  You're on my ignore list from now on.  No doubt you'll do the same, so that's an end to the matter.

 God, what a friendly person.

Jeez, Chewtobacca, you are so unfriendly.  You don't do anything around here except help people track down Ady's AVCHDs.  You should be more friendly by insisting your opinion is fact, taking everything personally, lashing out whenever you are questioned, and so on.

Now, back on topic...

I finally watched the review and I really enjoyed it.  I will say that the problems and failures of TPM have been well documented, and while his analysis was usually well done, I wasn't really that interested in that part of it.  I mean, we get plenty of discussion on the failures of the PT here, right?  What I really liked was the humor.  I was never bored and when it was over I actually was surprised how fast it went by.  However...

Vaderisnothayden said:

I found his humor often distasteful and misogynistic.

I agree with this (well, at least the misogynistic part, unless you want to argue that being misogynistic is distasteful, which I agree with, btw...where was I?).  I didn't have a problem with most of the humor, but there were a few parts that were misogynistic and I would have liked to see that removed.  I know they were part of his "character" but I still could have done without those bits.

Finally, I was surprised to find that I actually enjoyed his vocal treatment as well.  Having heard just a bit of it previously, I didn't know if I could take it for 70 minutes.  But for whatever reason, his voice grew on me the more I watched the review.

Vaderisnothayden said:

HotRod said:

is so shit!

 

That's all

 "Stop moaning".

Please tell me you're joking.

It's The Simpsons Movie, right?

Oh, I guess that would be the four-toed sloth.

Inglorious Bastards.  Much better than I expected.

(ok, ok, last movie seen was actually Avatar, but there's plenty of threads for that)

Skynet made Terminator Salvation?

http://www.skynet.net/

lol

I wish we had more threads like this, but I'm too chicken to start them.

ABC said:

TV's Frink said:

... For instance, who's the better actor, Lucas or Spielberg?

 I'd say: Bill Murray !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That wasn't an option! If I were VFP, I'd put you on PROBATION!!!