logo Sign In

Sluggo

User Group
Members
Join date
29-Sep-2004
Last activity
24-Jun-2018
Posts
6,820

Post History

Post
#364313
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
doubleofive said:
Sluggo said:
doubleofive said:

It's not bad editing.  It's seeing the same event twice from different viewpoints.  There are some movies completely built around that premise.  How else can you follow both the probe droid and Luke at the same time?  Split-screen?

 I gotta disagree with this.  It seems to be two different probes represented by filming one landing at different angles.  This was just a cost-cutting measure by LFL.

Sure, but Ady flipped the reverse shot, so now its even more obvious that they are the same explosion.

 

 So are you saying that Ady making the two shots into one singular event as far as the story goes?

Post
#364290
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
doubleofive said:

It's not bad editing.  It's seeing the same event twice from different viewpoints.  There are some movies completely built around that premise.  How else can you follow both the probe droid and Luke at the same time?  Split-screen?

 

 I gotta disagree with this.  It seems to be two different probes represented by filming one landing at different angles.  This was just a cost-cutting measure by LFL.

Post
#364263
Topic
James Bond 007 WARHEAD (* unfinished project *)
Time
Sluggo said:
edskizzorhands said:

I wish I wouldn't have announced this yet, only because I think it's going to take a little longer than expected. I recently got involved into a lot of work and it will be the fall at earliest before I can tackle this. Glad to see people are excited about it though.

 

 Don't sweat it.  Just let this thread slip into the murky haze of the dozens and dozens of projects in the works or on the backburner here and later on, you drop a warhead on us.

Cool!  Looks like you are getting ready to push the button. 

 

Post
#364262
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Sevb32 said:

What I find hilarious is that anything bad about ESB is Lucas' fault, but anything good is Kershner's.

 

 Now you are catching on!  It is too bad Kersh was powerless to stop Lucas from meddling with his movie!! :P

I believe Ady was touching up the scenes to remove the footprints from around where the explosion happened.

Post
#362297
Topic
Hypothetical
Time
Fang Zei said:

(Since this is the most recent thread having to do with the GOUT) ....

 

Well, Paramount just released the original versions of the first six Star Trek films in a boxset on blu-ray and - with the exception of Wrath of Khan (which recieved an all out restoration and therefore had zero excuse not to look great) - it seems they seriously did a half-assed job. Undiscovered Country is the biggest offender, taken from a 1080i master.

Y'know, I've decided that with these big franchises the studios are going to keep going back to the well until it's bone dry because the vast majority of people picking up their releases are fans of the franchise first and movie fans second.

Are you saying Wrath of Khan was released and looks great or wasn't released with this set?

 

Post
#362294
Topic
The Puppets or cgi?
Time
TheBoost said:
Akwat Kbrana said:

CG can be done right, but it must be approached with the aim in mind that it look real. The PT went instead for whacky cartoonisms, so its brand of CGI utterly fails to effectively "sell" itself to the viewer.

 

 Nail on the head there.

 

 I agree.  The battle droids (aside from being damn annoying) looked pretty good in the prequels.  It is the cgi creatures that aren't as convincing.  I wonder if part of the problem is that the cgi characters are animated by different ILMers, so they don't develop their own 'personality'. 

Having cgi look good as a remote object is one thing, having it be good as a living, that is something else.

Post
#362078
Topic
If Lucas Made an Indiana Jones V or VI would anyone here see them ?
Time
RRS-1980 said:

This thread would make a great poll...

 

Me? Considering that I'm still "Indy4-free"? Of course not. Just as I haven't seen the whole "Young Indiana Jones" series. And I do LOVE the original IJ Trilogy, it's part of me just like SW. It was probably one of the things that triggered my "1930s-mania".

I simply realized recently that the moviemaking style changed with time. Old creators of the originals changed too: they've got bored, old, burned-out... too rich as well. So there's no chance for "more of the good old stuff". And I don't want to watch travesties even for free. A "National Treasure"/"Tomb Raider"-like flick with Ford in it DOESN'T make Indiana Jones movie.

 

 I'd see new ones IF the filmmakers deliberately made the movies old school.  They would need to spend more effort making the plot makes sense than choreographing a fight sequence and the story-telling needs to get more attention than it has in a long time. 

Also, Speilberg needs to grow a pair.  If George ever comes up with another alien idea, Steven needs to stop it dead in it's tracks.

Post
#362073
Topic
Goodbye Prequels FOREVER
Time
C3PX said:
LexX said:

 Also the Ark is pretty lame, there's no info about what it really is and what it does and when you open it, it just kills people who have eyes opened. Yippee. People like different things.

This was made back in the good ol' days. When not ever damn thing needed to be explained. The general assumption was that most people would be cultured enough to know what the Ark of the Covenant was and some of the background behind it.

These days, if it wasn't something that has been referenced on Family Guy*, you can be pretty certain the average joe is completely clueless about it. God instructed the Israelites to build the Ark and to place various items significant to their exodus from Egypt inside of it (including the stone tablets containing the ten commandments.. No one was even allowed to touch the Ark, let alone open it. It was to be carried on poles by the priests from the tribe of Levi. One Biblical account has it incorrectly being carried on a cart by oxen, it begins to tip over and a man reaches out to steady it and instantly falls dead. It was kept in the Holy of Hollies of the tabernacle (portable temple, used during the wilderness wanderings). Only the high priest was allowed in the Holy of Hollies, and only at designated times.

So, I guess they didn't feel the need to take the time to explain much more about the Ark than the fact that it was a sacred Hebrew artifact. Most people knew at least a little about it, and if they didn't, they wouldn't have to do a lot of asking before they found someone who could tell them more. 

Fortunately in today's world, we are much more considerate of people's ignorance. For example, before publishing the first Harry Potter book in North America, they changed the title, as well as all references in the text of the book, from Philosopher's Stone to Sorcerer's Stone, because there was concern that some Americans might not know what a Philosopher's Stone was. I propose that GL make a special edition version called, Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Sacred Box of Hebrew Artifacts, perhaps he could add a few extra scenes giving some more explaination into the history of the sacred box of Hebrew artifacts. Also, to make the other two films match the title length of Indiana Jones and the Sacred Box of Hebrew Artifacts and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, he should rename them Indiana Jones and the Temple of Absolute Certain Doom and Weirdness and Indiana Jones and the Magical Everlasting Life Giving Cup of Christ.

 

 

*Funny story. There is this acquaintance of mine, every now and then we have a conversation, which usually consists of him talking about how good the latest movie he rented was, or about his favorite sports team. One time was talking about how great Transformers was and insisted that I needed to rent it sometime. Then he asked me what the last movie I had seen was, and I told him, "Casablanca". He then proceeded to give a long quote from the movie and I nearly shit my pants from surprise. I was almost expecting a, "Never heard of it? What is it about." from him, not a detailed, verbatim quote. After expressing my surprised, I asked, "Wait a minute, you didn't happen hear that line from Family Guy did you?" He grinned, "Yeah." Turns out he had never seen it and doesn't have a clue of what it is about.

 

Great post, C3PX, although my sister Holly might object to the idea of a Holy of Hollies. 

Post
#362046
Topic
Goodbye Prequels FOREVER
Time

It isn't just the rough outline of Star Destroyer, Tatooine, Death Star, etc; it is the details in each. 

There was a specific effort by George and the rest of the crew to make RoTJ bigger than Star Wars.  Jabba's Palace would have more creatures than the cantina.  The musical number would be bigger.  The space battle would be faster and more intense.  The lightsaber fight at the end would be bigger with aerobatics and stunts. 

Jedi was definitely a re-hash of Star Wars. 

 

Not that I am saying that it is bad that it is a re-hash.  If you want to gripe about something, you will find a reason to do it.  If it is similiar, then it is a re-hash; if it is different, then it isn't Star Wars.

Post
#361802
Topic
Rad (1986) (Released)
Time
CompMovieGuy said:

*update*

I know that I said with this update I was give some samples/screens but I have held off on the final encode until Ive decide what to do about extas and menus(the final script is done, as in Im not touching it anymore) deciding whether to reuse the one ones or start from scratch. But heres a treat for you guys, something I have been working on.....took quite a bit of time to get everything right and sync'd up and audio cleaned up.... let me know what you think

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTWRSaHXJGs
(dont forget to press the HQ button!)

Ive been working on the existing cover art, right now I have two designs going, but theyre not completely done yet but the backs will certainly be better than the original

 

 Good looking trailer, my man!  That took me back to the day.

Post
#361790
Topic
STAR WARS: LAST OF THE JEDI (fanedit of 'Return of the Jedi' - unfinished project)
Time
JasonN said:

My edit of "Luke's goodbye to Leia on Endor" scene - since Luke and Leia are NOT twins in this edit, I had to tweak their relationship to have more of a romantic undercurrent:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxGKtjwlIi4

 

 I am not sure about this one.  It just seems abrupt with Luke suddenly talking about his mother.  What would come before that?

Post
#361149
Topic
Info &amp; Ideas: ESB and ROTJ Wishlist
Time
vaderios said:

That shot have no sense at ALL...

Just completetely ignore the holo. I messed up the saves and i hadnt the undo i was needed.

 

Considering ady's way of thinking i could propose a vader from 501st legion to move like the movie so the bridge isnt full in the middle of nowhere.

 

-Angel

 

 I like the holo. 

 

The Empire cant invade Basketball.  Basketball is a peaceful planet...