logo Sign In

SilverWook

User Group
Members
Join date
9-Dec-2004
Last activity
6-Apr-2023
Posts
22,080

Post History

Post
#681945
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

doubleofive said:

skyjedi2005 said:


But no more stories will be told in the old EU prime universe.  Its gone and replaced with whatever Disney is replacing it with much like replacing the real star trek with the JJ version.

http://www.thetrekcollective.com/p/2014-star-trek-publication-schedule.html

Tell that to a majority of the Star Trek EU.

 Have any Abramsverse Trek novels actually come out? I recall a couple that were in the wings were postponed indefinitely some time after the first film came out. The comic was unaffected.

Post
#681674
Topic
Your DVD Collection
Time

Anybody find any discolored discs in their collection recently? Seems to be a thing with some discs about a decade old now. Doesn't seem to affect playability yet, but it's still a point of concern with something that may be out of print and expensive to replace.

Bad enough I have to worry about labels falling off of Laserdiscs inside the player now.

Post
#681660
Topic
Jedi Council Forum Laughs
Time

Padme, for reasons of Naboo custom (or politics) not being able to love Anakin openly would have made slightly better sense.

Jedi not being able to marry and crank out more Force babies is pretty ridiculous when you think about it. Factor in some parents might not even want their kid to run off and join up, and you have one heck of a recruitment shortage.

Post
#681606
Topic
Can Episode VII ignore the prequels?
Time

skyjedi2005 said:

The one thing the Sequel trilogy is going to do and will have fans up in arms.  Is that everything which started with Heir to the Empire is now gone.  The EU has been effectively rebooted or erased.

Not exactly the thing EU fans thought they were getting.  They maybe imagined wrongly that the Zahn trilogy would be loosely followed by the new scripts.

Lucas has always maintained that the EU never happened or was a separate universe.  Was something that came out of licensing and was just really a source of revenue. Remember Lucas was financing his own films he was not a multi- billion dollar studio like Disney. 

He never intended to make them after 2005 the sequel films i mean.  He intended the story to always be the tragedy of darth vader. Wonder what Retcon is coming to undue that the Empire is dead and its only six films.  Where is this new story going to come from.  Probably whole cloth and whether or not its accepted is anyone's guess.

They may as well have Tarkin come on screen and say " the last vestiges of the Old EU have been swept away."

It will be like JJ Trek where Enterprise happened but not the original series the movies or the next gen.  Only the 2011 star wars prequel and special edition will be the continuity the sequels follow.  The oot or pre sequel EU never happened.

 Not everyone religiously follows the EU. Disney is going to be courting people who have only seen the films as well. About the only time the EU even got national media attention was when Chewbacca was killed off in Vector Prime.
 
If people are going to have a hissy fit because the novels are being ignored, they're better off staying home. The EU isn't the backbone of the SW universe, the films are.

Abram's Trek takes place in a alternate timeline. Everything that happened still happened.

Post
#681602
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

ray_afraid said:

^There's no accounting for taste. I realized when he first started posing movie ratings that his barometer was screwy and that he's probably quite young. Nothin' wrong with any of that.

I'm sure twenty-six is quite young from a certain point of view. But perhaps I should bring up the fact that I am a fan of older movies, prefer them to newer movies by a very long shot, and that my opinion has nothing to do with "Duh, old movies suck"?

As for why I rated Aliens the way I did ...

I didn't like any of the Marines. They were all asinine douchebags, and I was happy to see them die.

I find it pathetic that a group of Marines -- knowing they're going up a whole goddamn hive of nasty man-killing bugs with acidic blood -- armour themselves in bulletproof vests and helmets only, leaving the rest of their bodies open to damage. I could understand it if this movie were set in the present, but it's set in the far future; am I really supposed to believe that a future civilization capable of building FTL-capable starships can't come up with battlesuits or smart armour?

I don't like how all the mystique and ambiguity of the creature from the original film is taken away by making its species nothing more than giant, stupid ants driven by instinct and nothing more.  

 Pvt. Vasquez would like a word with you. ;)

And I don't see how Hicks could be considered an douchebag.

I read somewhere that not long after the movie came out, Marine recruiters were hanging Vasquez posters in their office windows, until upper brass ordered them to stop.

Post
#681535
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

darklordoftech said:

SilverWook said:

darklordoftech said:

Am I the only who finds it hilarious that Dark Horse is being celebrated with a comic that brought Palpatine (and Boba for those who don't think he could have made it out of the sarlacc) back from the dead?

1. Marvel brought Boba back first. And put him right back, but arguably the survival odds were better being trapped inside the sandcrawler that fell in, which probably gave the Sarlacc one hell of a tummy ache.

2. Lucasfilm could have said no to bringing both of them back, and didn't. George has had veto power over what the comics do from the beginning.

3. More improbable things have happened in the prequels. ;)

2. If Person A could have stopped person B from murdering somebody and didn't, person B isn't guilty of murder?

3. If person A murders one person and person B murders two people, Person A isn't guilty of murder?

 You're comparing unfavorable plot points to murder? I give up.

Post
#681514
Topic
Star Wars 1982, TESB 1984, and Rotj 1986 VHS restoration (* unfinished project *)
Time

Then you won't mind if we lock the other thread? This is getting confusing.

And BTW, I merely found that image on deviantart. Makes it easier for me to not mix you up with a couple other fellows. I take no credit for it. Credit the artist if you wish.

http://sw--obi-wan-kenobi.deviantart.com/art/Darth-Kenobi-177162005

Post
#681487
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

darklordoftech said:

Am I the only who finds it hilarious that Dark Horse is being celebrated with a comic that brought Palpatine (and Boba for those who don't think he could have made it out of the sarlacc) back from the dead?

1. Marvel brought Boba back first. And put him right back, but arguably the survival odds were better being trapped inside the sandcrawler that fell in, which probably gave the Sarlacc one hell of a tummy ache.

2. Lucasfilm could have said no to bringing both of them back, and didn't. George has had veto power over what the comics do from the beginning.

3. More improbable things have happened in the prequels. ;)

Post
#681429
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

Yikes. The fish dies by the mouth.

At least DH ended their run with SW on a high note with the The Star Wars adaptation. (The personal low point for me was the 1997 SE comics that were touted as being replacements for the Marvel adaptations, yeah right!)  I don't have high expectations for Marvel to do anything as interesting. Unless they publish Ric Olie and the Attractive Army. ;)