logo Sign In

PaulisDead2221

User Group
Members
Join date
3-Nov-2005
Last activity
6-Mar-2024
Posts
548

Post History

Post
#327321
Topic
Trivial Pursuit: STAR WARS ORIGINAL TRILOGY (Part III)
Time

Alright. I've given it some thought, and I've compiled a special, excessively cheap prize for the user who proves they've seen these three movies way more than anyone else. It's a super special banner to put in your signature, complete with your username proclaiming you, the Star Wars Trivial Pursuit Champion. You just post the link in your signature. As long as you maintain your domination over everyone else, you keep the banner. If anyone surpasses you, I break the link, and create a new one for the current champion. There needs to be some sort of system for new-comers to be able to compete against users who've been playing since round one, but I don't know what it is yet. First champion will be crowned at the end of round ten.

 

SCOREBOARD:

Gaffer Tape 11 POINTS

astromech 6 POINTS [tied]

dumb kid 6 POINTS [tied]

Hot Rod 5 POINTS

Mier 4 POINTS

 

ROUND 3

What open rectangular feature does a Star Destroyer have on its underside? 1 POINT

What did Chewbacca do during the escape from Tatooine, while Han calculated the hyperspace jump? 2 POINTS [dumb kid]

Who bravely assumed full responsibility for losing track of the Falcon, and then apologized to Lord Vader? 3 POINTS [Gaffer Tape]

Who was the first Rebel pilot to die during the first Death Star battle? 3 POINTS [hot rod]

Who did George Lucas describe as a "cynical, world-weary pessimist"? 5 POINTS [Mielr]

What character was referred to as "the Critter," during early story meetings for The Empire Strikes Back? 6 POINTS [astromech]

Post
#327230
Topic
Trivial Pursuit: STAR WARS ORIGINAL TRILOGY (Part III)
Time
Gaffer Tape said:

Who was sitting immediately behind Luke Skywalker when Luke's landspeeder entered Mos Eisley?

C-3PO

And I don't know. The only idea I have right now is to simply keep up with the scores of everybody who participates and then list them at the beginning of every round. It's your game, so I suppose it ends when you say it does... and whoever has accumulated the most points wins! Wins what? Well, of course, the honor of having won! And it is only one response per round allowed, right? And I also assume that once a question has been accurately answered, it's off the table...

EDIT: Oops, I see you already did all that in your updated first post.

Doesn't have to be just my game.  It can be our game :)

Post
#327225
Topic
Trivial Pursuit: STAR WARS ORIGINAL TRILOGY (Part III)
Time

Nice start everybody. It's a little tough finding questions up to the caliber here. Can you believe one of the questions reads "What actor played Luke Skywalker?" I can't really think of a goal or way to win, much less any system of reward for winning the game. If anybody has any ideas, you can post them here.

The number of stormtroopers who broke into the Death Star control room was 6.

 

Scoreboard:

dumb kid 6 POINTS

Gaffer Tape 5 POINTS

astromech 3 POINTS

Hot Rod 1 POINT

 

ROUND 2

What group did the Emperor dismiss as "insignificant"? 1 POINT

What was Luke's two-word response when Han told him to be careful before the Battle of Hoth? 3 POINTS [astromech]

What planet's landmarks include the North Ridge? 4 POINTS [HotRod]

What was Luke Skywalker's rank in the Rebel Alliance during The Empire Strikes Back? 4 POINTS [Mielr]

Who was sitting immediately behind Luke Skywalker when Luke's landspeeder entered Mos Eisley? 6 POINTS [gaffer tape]

How many rats were seen crawling in Jabba the Hutt's dungeon window? 6 POINTS

Post
#327124
Topic
Trivial Pursuit: STAR WARS ORIGINAL TRILOGY (Part III)
Time

TRIVIAL PURSUIT: STAR WARS ORIGINAL TRILOGY THREAD

I found my old Star Wars original trilogy trivial pursuit game. In the spirit of the Pop Quiz thread over at fanedit.org, I thought I’d break out some cards and ask some questions. Scores are recorded and updated in the first post after each set of questions have all been answered. Points are assigned to a question using the plastic R2-D2 random number generator that comes with the game. Only answer one question per round.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STP: EPISODE III: SCOREBOARD [UPDATED AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH ROUND]:

HotRod 25 POINTS

see you auntie 20 POINTS

Mielr 18 POINTS/****2 Assist Trophies

bkev 18 POINTS

Moth3r 15 POINTS

Johnny Ringo **14 POINTS/1 Bone/**2 Proton Torpedoes

astromech 14 POINTS/1 Rancor with Rancor Pit


ROUND: ONE

How many X-wing starfighters were destroyed while flying through the second Death Star? 6 POINTS [dumb kid]

Who described the transmission from the Hoth probe droid as “the best lead we’ve had”? 1 POINT [Hot Rod]

Who was the first Rebel snowspeeder crewman seen killed in the Battle of Hoth? 3 POINTS [astromech]

How many stormtroopers broke into the Death Star’s hangar control room? 5 POINTS

How many times did Luke deactivate his lightsaber in his duel with Vader on the second Death Star? 2 POINTS [dumb kid]

Who covered Biggs while he destroyed a deflection tower on the Death Star’s surface? 5 POINTS [Gaffer Tape]

Post
#326663
Topic
Star Wars - The Vintage Edit (* unfinished project *)
Time

About the 1997 subwoofer channel:  That's an interesting point you bring up about the authenticity of using the lfe from the 1997 mix.  If I understand correctly (please correct me if I'm wrong), Star Wars originally used a 'baby-boom' sub-woofer effect for the six track (simply amplifying low frequencies in that channel), so I don't know how I feel about nixing the 1997 lfe for the cheap 1977 lfe effect for the sake of authenticity.  Luckily it'll be some time before I get access to the 97 mix, so I'll have time to think about it I suppose.

Post
#325897
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Fjodin said:

I have 3 uestion to adywan:

1) I know that you removedse wampa scene,but could youadd it in DVD Bonus, like you've done with Jabba? i realy like this Wampa.

2) Why you removed scene when vaders shutle flys from Bespin to SSD?

3)i hope you dont delete SE Max Rebo Scene from ROTJ. I REALY like it. :)

PS. I love your Ep4! Its better than original! :)

 

2) The problem with the shot inside the executor is that it is a recycled shot from the opening scene to Return of the Jedi. It's just like--'what the hell?' I personally don't have much of a problem with the scenes of Vader's shuttle taking off, and traversing through space. I understand some people say it slows down the pacing of the escape of the Millenium Falcon, but I think it provides a little expansion to what everybody's doing at the moment.

Ady, what do you think of the star maps so far? I love the brighter stars in both your last edit and in this one, but have you thought about working on the star maps to make them a little more realistic? Maybe star clusters, or milky way-like formations strewn across the screen could give a sense that these planets do indeed exist in a galaxy far far away. It would be interesting to see the action take place against a backdrop of stars that looks more like what you see when you look up into the sky on a clear night.  If it was at all feasible, I think it could be real cool to see probe droids searching a galaxy that looked like this.

Post
#325467
Topic
Star Wars - The Vintage Edit (* unfinished project *)
Time

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/70mm-mix-to-93-mix-comparison/topic/6501/

Oh yeah, never mentioned, Ripplin. Nice avatar.

I cannot wait for this. About the crawl, am I nuts, or is the GOUT opening shot (including the crawl, pan down and the ships flying overhead) look noticeably better than the rest of the movie? Apart from the whole non-amamorphic-ness the film source looks good to me, I wonder what it is...

I believe the consensus is that the opening shot must have been captured from a proper film source, and was edited in from the opening logo, to the subsequent shot after the initial pan down. It makes for a great source if I can just get the aliasing off the edges in the back lines.

Post
#325442
Topic
Star Wars - The Vintage Edit (* unfinished project *)
Time

Yeah, I reconsidered using the 2004 mix.  I'm in talks of obtaining the optical captures of the 1997 SE 5.1 mix.  Those seem to be much better than the 1997 upmix that's been floating around.  It will be GOUT synched (just as my whole project is GOUT synced).  I can mostly spot the major differences between 93 and back, and I have a forum page saved with information on some of the more subtle additions in 1993 and on (extra lasers and such).  I'll definitely compile a test mix for the right people.

Post
#325335
Topic
Star Wars film versions and best DVD sources
Time
Mielr said:

Maybe it's a false memory, but I swear that when I first saw ESB theatrically in 1982,
Han's "and I thought they smelled bad on the outside" line was a different take in
the version I saw (compared to all the subsequent video versions I'vd seen).
I have no idea if the theatrical showing I saw was 35mm or 70mm (was there even a 70mm re-issue of ESB?)

I haven't seen the 8mm version, however. Was that scene included?


There's a difference in that take between most home video releases and the ESB DVD.  The version in the 2004 DVD is from the 70mm mix.

Post
#325276
Topic
Star Wars - The Vintage Edit (* unfinished project *)
Time

I didn't want to do an update until I had something new to show.  I got a few really good looking encodes going, and I wanted to post screenshots, but it could use some more tweaking.  I'm having an issue with a strange jitter every second.  Seems to be because Adobe Premiere reads my HD source as 23.00 fps instead of 24.  Right now I'm just working on reassociating some files and figuring out the jitter.  I'm only completely lost on a few things:

1) The opening matte lasers are proving to be kind of tough, I could either overlay the lasers from the opening of the GOUT, which would be idea, and authentic.  What I'll probably have to do though, is redo each one, which is fine, except the HD video moves so slow and all.

2) The opening crawl looks great, until it recedes about four lines up, and major aliasing appears on the edges.  I either need to learn to recreate the crawl on my own, in HD res or higher, to avoid aliasing, or put an antialiasing blur on the crawl four lines up.  Again, the only issue with either is the cumbersome work involved with HD running.

3) There's four transitional wipes that Premiere can't do because it won't feather the edges properly.  The four wipes include, R2 in the canyons, the wipe to Ben's hut, the wipe to the cliff overlooking Mos Eisley, and the wipe to the entry in Mos Eisley.  I've been looking for programs to do just those shots with, but can't seem to find a program my computer is up to par with, or a program that will do the wipes right, or that I can work up to the learning curve for.

Anyway, besides that, everything's going fine.  I have a small side project in which I'm trying to create an general approximation of the original six track mix.  Sources include the 2004 SE DVD 5.1 surround track, the 1997 SE 5.1 surround track, the stereo six track mix preservation from Belbucus, as well as the isolated score.  The idea is to repair/re-approximate/mix/rework the various mixes into a 5.1 experience of the original six track.

So it's still moving.  If anyone has any advice, or help, it would be greatly appreciated.  I might be able to post new screenshots in the next few days or so.

Post
#325077
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Perhaps if you decide to go back to a 480p release, you can encode the HD color corrected work at 480p, and start on that as your master file.  There shouldn't be any quality loss, since it's been down-converted from a 1080p source, and it would free up a ton of space, and speed up rendering time, having excised the multiple layers of color passes.  Of course it wouldn't be free of further tweaking after the first few passes, but it seems as though it would free up a lot of work.

Post
#324807
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
adywan said:

Kurgan said:

 

As an addendum, to make this about Star Wars movies, so Ady doesn't put me on ignore ;) I'm going to say... please don't modify the lines in ROTJ about Leia and Luke's mother at all. Mess with Revenge of the Sith. Please no more toying with the Originals to "make them fit" with the Prequels. That's Lucas' fault, and it shouldn't be taken out on the original movies, no matter how many "ESB is better than ROTJ" fanboys there are out there. People agree that Hayden replacing Shaw was a travesty (and I say BRING THE DANGED EYEBROWS BACK! Put CG eyebrows on Hayden if you have to in ROTS, I don't care... but Shaw looks far worse without them)... don't add to it!

There, rant over. In four years, I hope people remember I said that!

I'll be changing ROTS to fit in with the RORJ conversation. i have a few ideas of how to do it , but thats a few years off yet. As for the eyebrows then i have to disagree there. i prefer them gone. After all he was badly burned and hair is one of the first things to be burned off. I hate it in movies when some one has been set on fire and their hair is still there. The funeral Scene in TPM annoys me. Qui-Gon is burning but his hair isn't touched. It just becomes totally unrealistic. Losing the eyebrows was one of the changes GL did that i actually agree with. But Hayden in ROTJ has to go.

Ziz said:

Adding some more explosion to cover the disappearing bridge would be the easiest fix. That's probably what ILM wanted to do at the time but it slipped past, because if you look close at the shot, it looks like they did the hold-out matte for the explosion element but didn't comp an actual explosion back in.

I'm gong to re-do the FX for that shot so we see the bridge damaged after the explosion. It may yet mean doing a completely different FX shot for that one.

Octorox said:

Also, I think Ady should make a ROTJ thread now so we can discuss these things ahead of time.

I don't think starting a ROTJ:R thread yet is a good idea. It will just distract me from ESB:R and i need to concentrate on one film at a time .

ImperialFighter said:

Adywan, at the transition 'wipe' (1:22:08 PAL 'timing') which changes from Luke's X-wing flying away from 'Dagobah' to a reveal of Bespin 'floating city' in white clouds, I miss the movement and roar of the orange twin-pod vehicle that came directly towards us in the original GOUT version. It was removed in the SE, and replaced with a 'floating gas refinery' instead. The 'floating gas refinery' is fair enough, but I'd sure like to see the movement of a twin-pod vehicle back here, which gave the original shot a bit more life. There are a few existing elements which could be used or 'flipped' for this (either coming at us or away from us), and it's just something else to consider come the time.

 

yeh, i miss the cloud car fly by too. The problem is that, now i am working in 1080p, using any footage from the GOUT is now out of the question. I was going to add the car back in but it will really stick out . But i never liked the addition of the gas mine as it stands now. it just looks so fake to me. I'm going to be doing new FX footage for that shot.

Sluggo, that AT-AT picture i've never seen before. It definitely looks like it was originally filmed for ESB. Those pics have actually given me a few ideas for the Hoth Battle now too.

Well the colour correction is taking a lot longer to do thanks to the 1080p res. So no updates for a while.

You'd be surprised at what motion stabilization and proper color matching of sources can acccomplish.  I think using the GOUT PWNAGE avisynth script, upconverted to 1080 lines of resolution would look just fine.  I'm just speaking from experience, watching test encodes mixing 480p non-anamorphic and 1080 high def images.  Especially when it will just be the cloud car element, put through a stabilization script, I think you can pull it off easy.  Then again, maybe an entirely new fx shot is necessary.

Post
#323571
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
adywan said:

rlockhart said:

Adywan will all the previous work on ESB be in 720p ? a better way to putting it will all of ESB be 720p quality. One more thing why not 1080p is it because of the source material ?

I will be starting from scratch so everything will be in 720p. All the project files ahve been saved so its just a matter of dropping in the 720p source foir the colour correction first pass. shouldn't take me too long to catch up with what i ahve done already. 1080p is impossible to work with on a project like this due to all the colour correction and FX work i will be doing. Even a quad core can't cope with all the work being done. it just crawls or grinds to a hault

I'm not sure what your video editing program is (you told me once, and I forgot. Vegas?).  Anyway, when I did Batman: Year One in 1080p, I did it with Adobe Premiere Pro.  As long as your video editing program has multiple video tracks, this will work.  I put the 1080p version on video track one, then above it, on video track two, I put a 480p version of the same film, frame accurate to the HD version.  I then set video track one to be invisible, and just made sure that every change I made to my visible 480p footage, was also done to the 1080p version.  Basically, every edit you make is made twice, then when it was time to encode, I set video track one to be visible, and video track two to be invisible.  It still slows things down excessively, but only during the final encoding stage.  I'm not sure if this information may be helpful to you, or how stressful, if implemented, it would make editing with all the color correction/fx layering you do (which I would imagine takes up more than two video tracks).  But I thought you might find a way to temper the method to make 1080p editing work for you.

Post
#322577
Topic
The Empire Strikes Back - The Vintage Edit (Released)
Time
bkev said:

PaulisDead2221 said:

Originally posted by: iSamurai
Anyways, the showing went alright, not as well as we had hoped, but not bad. This is probably because most of the Seniors/Juniors have sports after school. I've talked to many of them and they said that they would have liked to go, but had to go to practice. So I'm thinking we might to a back-to-back showing for ESB.


Yeah a lot of people I talked to too. Jocks you know...go figure. I just don't know if I can sit through Empire twice in a row.

Updates:
-Isolated score is synced up.
-Empire is being shown next week instead of this week, and Jedi two weeks later, giving me three weeks to work on Jedi.

You know, I forgot about Jedi. Did you ever work on that?

No :(.  I got swamped and we just planned to show OCP's Jedi.  Of course a variety of things happened after that and we never actually got around to showing Jedi anyway.

Dunedain is right in this case, Empire was the first one I did, sourced from the DVD, with the 2006 DVD release of Empire used as the alternate source.  It's not technically "beta", though with what I'm doing now, I kind of consider it beta, maybe just consider it the version that I liked until I realized I could do better.  It was generally well received when it was released over a year ago.  If anybody would like a copy, they can PM me and we can set it up, the torrent for it (at least the original one that I, myself, posted) has been dead a long time.  I'm not sure if anyone has posted torrents for it since (.avis for example)

I'll be editing ESB and ROTJ much differently than I'm editing ANH right now.  It wasn't until I edited my Batman edit (Batman: Year One) as well as my Batman vs Superman crossover edit, that I figured out a very efficient way to edit HD material (for a fucking Bats vs Supes edit, you need to be able to work pretty efficiently! lolz).  Editing Star Wars now is very slow as my computer can't render the HD frames in Adobe Premiere very quickly, but ESB and ROTJ will get the boost of speed from all I've learned about doing Hi-Def complex editing structures from my HD fan-edits.  If hard drive space provides, I may do them side by side, releasing them that much more quickly.  ESB 2.0 may end up being released last, as we find out more about what we're doing with this 35mm print of Empire.

Thanks for the continued interest everybody :)

Post
#320802
Topic
Info: another 16mm print of SW on eBay
Time
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

I think you all should be realistic about how great this 16mm transfer could be. Let's remember that the GOUT is the result of a very high end scan of a 35mm print. Yeah, I know it also got a bit mangled along the way, and it's not anamorphic. But can we really expect to give a 16mm print to the local shop (or even to me) and have it come back better than the GOUT? Like I said, it is likely to be VERY interesting for research, is likely to have some pleasing qualities, an intriguing soundtrack, and who knows what cool little surprises here and there... heck if it has the original crawl, who knows what else it has? But it also is likely to have some noticeable film grain, color fading issues, problems on the borders, scratches, inferior sound, uneven lighting, poor blacks and whites, and who knows what other imperfections.

The whole reason I do my own 16mm/8mm transfers is because after years of hiring a variety of shops do them for me, I finally decided if you want something done decently you have to do it yourself. Now I see all the flaws in my own work, and worse when I see the horrors other people get back from the "local pro". So all I have to say is, although I know I can produce something very cool out of a decent 16mm print, don't expect the holy grail no matter who does the transfer - unless someone here has access to a real meticulous Hollywood top-end film scan (which I highly doubt). For one thing it would cost considerably more than the print itself, if you could even get such a shop to do it.

That said, I hope someone from this forum wins. It would be a REALLY fun project.


I understand what you're saying, and I would hope most people wouldn't be looking for a DVD of just the transfer, and see that as a victory against both the GOUT and the 2004 DVDs. I personally see a massive amount of potential in an aged, yet sharp and focused, transfer open to work throughout the community. Imagine if the GOUT was captured in 1993 in 1080i, yeah the transfer needs work, that's what digital film restoration is for, but the clarity and digital surface area available to us is way better than before. Remember the good ol' days?--when everybody was engaged in transfers of their old laserdiscs? We were on this crusade for the best looking LD transfer we could get. Somebody captured the video, they put it through the filters, they put together a sound mix, and they released a DVD to the community.

I think getting something like this together would be like going back to the good ol' days. Yes the overall quality of this transfer will not be in great condition. There will be noticeable film grain, avisynth has--like--20 different options for removing film grain. There will be color issues, that's what color correction is for. I know I, myself, will be doing it the easy way, with histograms, but there are many here who would take careful time to do it right. There are problems with the border stability, that's what stabilization is for. Sound quality will not be all the way there, but user Belbucus has done extensive work on three or four different variations on the theatrical mix for Star Wars that sound fantastic, and are available freely throughout the community. There are poor blacks and whites, that's what the level's function is for. I remember looking at the screen-shots on eBay. My immediate reaction was "start with adjusting the levels." We can rebuild it. We totally have the technology.

I hope I don't come off as argumentative. I'm excited about getting this transferred because it's fantastic source material, open to a variety of interpretations on how to get the best out of it. Anyway, I agree it's a long shot, but it's not re-named A New Hope for no reason.
Post
#320685
Topic
Info: another 16mm print of SW on eBay
Time
Dunedain said:

PaulisDead2221: That sounds like a dream 16mm transfer. A full 1080 scan would mean a superb dual layer DVD could be made from it. Plus a full HD version could be made, too. :) Would that scan be at 1920x1080 at 24 frames per second?


Well HDV (according to Wikipedia) is capable of capturing 24 frames per second, and capable of either 720p or 1080i, so I believe 24 fps goodness in 1080i is what we can look forward to.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDV

Here's a link for anyone who'd like to know more about how the film will be stored if we win the print. I didn't know that HDV was just DV with compressed HD video on it, I was a little wary at first, but considering the bit-rate will be close to 20 Mbit/s, it should look great.
Post
#320653
Topic
Info: another 16mm print of SW on eBay
Time
I went into a video productions service place near where I live. They will do a 16mm tele-cine of the film if I bring it in. They can capture it on an HDV tape, and provide a 1080i transfer of the film stock on the tape. In addition, they will supply an mpeg2 of the capture if I bring in some portable media to put it on (ie several DL DVDs, external hard drive, etc). They will leave it untouched, and just do a clean, straight transfer of the film. They can also capture the audio and provide it in 32 bit float wav format. The cost would be 15 cents a foot of film. Star Wars should be--like--2300 feet or so I believe.

I was very blatant about what film specifically I was talking about getting transferred, and we spoke extensively about the copyright infringement aspects of what we were doing. The only concern was that they saw how they could be "profiting" off of the transfer, but assured me that the international copyright agreement pretty much had nothing to say about what we were doing, especially because it's for educational purposes. Basically, they agree with our "own the official stuff" code of ethics, and are more than willing to participate in helping us preserve the film.

I can get it transferred, and provide copies to anyone who wishes to do some digital clean-up work, stabilization, IVTC work, color correction, or what have you. The only question is whether we would like to transfer the one on eBay (granted we even win it), or if maybe Puggo's lead would feel comfortable with their copy getting transferred by somebody else besides Puggo.
Post
#320548
Topic
Info: another 16mm print of SW on eBay
Time
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

Wait a day or so before going crazy bidding... I've got a lead on a print that I might start transfering this month. I've sent a message to the individual in an attempt to determine if the one on eBay is better quality or not. I should be able to report back tomorrow. There's still 3 days left in the auction.

And please don't expect 1080p from my Workprinter. Although 16mm film can indeed produce great results, you'd need a higher-end scanner (like the one GL has apparently mothballed - heh) to achieve THAT.


Oh, I know, but the community would have a good clarity print is all I mean. Plus maybe we can get a hook up in the future or something. It would be sweet if your lead could supply a better transfer, less money to spend.
Post
#320535
Topic
Info: another 16mm print of SW on eBay
Time
hmmm. how many "quality pixels" are in 16mm footage?

http://www.cinematechnic.com/super_16mm/resolution_of_super_16mm.html

This link says it's at least as good as 1080p uncompressed, or if not that, at least way better than standard NTSC resolution. The buyer does tell you it's a bit washed out, but a quick run through the levels function in avisynth or virtualdub could fix that quickly. That coupled with a number of other free-ware filters for motion stabilization and yadda yadda yadda, and we could probably end up with an OK looking transfer, for possible applications in DE-SEing projects if the shots could be cleaned up enough.

Can only capture at DV resolution, Puggo? Damn. At least having a 16mm print around the forums could be good for the community in general. I know we shouldn't hope for our very own special OT.com HD print of Star Wars if we bought it, but it could be something to experiment with around the community. It's nothing big to hope for, but who knows what could be done with it. I have $300 I'd be willing to throw down with anyone who'd like to go for it.
Post
#319708
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
adywan said:

GhostAlpha26 said:

Ady, will there be any chance of you releasing a purely color corrected version of ESB? I know you couldnt with ANHR but I thought it would be nice to have an ESB color corrected version and I think it would be a great help to the community for anyone planning to do future projects with the movie.


I'm not sure about this. the problem is that i do a lot of the colour tweaking later in the process when i'm doing FX work and have got the editing done. I don't bother doing proper colour correction to any of the space shots or the shots that are full FX only until that stage. So the colour would be all over the place until then.


Ady can still share his custom color tweaks with the rest of the forum. I made a histogram off of the initial release of ANH:R, and applied it to the 2004 DVD and HD broadcasts of ANH. It looked very good, and would be a great start for anyone wanting to create a project of their own. I can upload the histograms if anyone is interested. I know I've asked you this before, Adywan, but do you use a Mac or a PC?