logo Sign In

Mocata

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Feb-2017
Last activity
28-Jun-2025
Posts
2,663

Post History

Post
#1597112
Topic
Yellow Lightsabers
Time

Nothing about the current explanation really makes sense. It was better when it seemed as though red was a choice by bad guys, but not always. As mentioned Leia had a red blade. Villains in Dark Forces II had different ones, even blue. It was more logical to assume the crystal was simply unique rather then being “changed” by good/evil deeds. Not everything about a character has to be linked to a weapon after all; it’s giving a tool too much importance.

In something like KOTOR the colours were coded to Jedi roles but I don’t like that idea either, it’s like being given a boring job interview instead of finding a crystal yourself. These days it seems like yellow was used to make Rey seem even more unique (until recent TV shows) but in the past it was used in merchandise because the manufacturers didn’t have the right production art or movie stills yet.

Post
#1596637
Topic
'Rey Skywalker' (Upcoming live action motion picture) - general discussion thread
Time

The current narrative is that all mainstream pop culture is bad, not just what falls under the (admittedly large) umbrella of Disney. Actual SW discussion seems to be dead as it once was at its height during the sequel trilogy. For me it became clear when that guy from Collider say he had been “busting his ass as a Star Wars fan” hahah jeez. The traffic those kind of videos got is clearly dead, so it’s just general entertainment for the masses / corporate decision making they dislike. And to be fair a Rey movie isn’t an artistic decision it’s just a branding one. They could do almost anything with the IP but they can’t get (or don’t have faith in) any proper writers apparently.

Post
#1596501
Topic
❗ <strong>#ReleaseTheOriginalTrilogy</strong> | OriginalTrilogy.com’s enduring goal | How <strong>you</strong> can help ❗
Time

If you’re going to post on Twitter just do it rather than getting this all way off topic more than it already is. George isn’t ever going to be on there for real so I’m not sure what you’re worried about. The idea is to show solidarity and not let the cause be lost over time, hence a single hashtag that can be found by people on a wide platform. If you want to wax lyrical about anything else start a new thread of your own use any social media of your choice.

Post
#1595955
Topic
Strong Female characters in the Star Wars universe
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

Still Luke running the Jedi religion and Leia running the government how does that work if the galaxy finds out Vader was their father. How do you prevent something like the first order from happening, which happened in Disney. or how does Luke prevent a student of his or several of them from going dark and upending everything.

Those are good points for development of drama in a film which will never exist.

Post
#1595873
Topic
Strong Female characters in the Star Wars universe
Time

Padme is a total cipher. Beyond some lip-service to her role in the Republic collapsing she’s there to give birth and vanish, as the OT dictates. Since the rise of the Empire and the birth of Luke is a given she has no agency in ROTS. Even in the previous films she exists as basic love interest since Anakin has to become evil. She does nothing to act in the face of obvious problems, which would make her have some impact or actual tragedy. A military creation act? That’s good and convenient. Oh wait it’s never mentioned again. Arguably she does a few things in TPM but it’s hardly relevant later. Which is funny because she should have some role in hiding Leia.

Post
#1595760
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

It should probably be a case of ‘the road to hell is paved with good intentions’ but instead it comes off as ‘dumb people are too dumb to do anything right’. Clearly the rise of the Empire wasn’t supposed to be the result of arrogance and hubris alone, but everything seems to point to that; especially in all the spin-off material. The clone army is baffling enough but we’re never shown things like an investigation into where Darth Maul came from. Diminished force powers don’t account for the lack of basic thinking.

Post
#1595757
Topic
❗ <strong>#ReleaseTheOriginalTrilogy</strong> | OriginalTrilogy.com’s enduring goal | How <strong>you</strong> can help ❗
Time

doubleofive said:

My feeling after years of study is that Lucas doesn’t want to be reminded of work he wasn’t happy with at the time and only reminds him of what he lost. Every movie he swore it was the last and that he and Marcia could settle down after, but by the time RotJ was done, she was gone.

Doesn’t change the fact that it’s film history and should be preserved, but I get his hesitation now.

It’s not spite, it’s regret.

If he feels regret then he should show it and have some respect for the talent he collaborated with during those years. Instead it’s always him vs the studios, a rhetoric he continued during Red Tails period. Nobody gets me, nobody wants to take a risk, nobody understands my true artistic vision, etc. He spent a lot of energy and time and money on the work in the early days but jeez the tortured auteur thing and one standing alone is a sham and everybody knows it. He’s not David Lynch for crying out loud (someone who also had plenty of support from people close to him for a breakthrough 1977 movie).

Post
#1595142
Topic
Special Editions - Improvement to Film or Changing History?
Time

It seems like a pointless topic to raise here of all places, but the problems go well beyond ‘improving’ things if that was ever the true intention. Which is probably wasn’t as most of us already know; George knew about producing and fund raising better than anything else, and a theatrical re-release tied with new effects that used Jurassic Park tech to figure out what could be done in The Phantom Menace was making and saving money all at once.

As stated above there are all kinds of conflicting things he’s said over the many decades, keeping him in the limelight and burying real film history. We have so many threads here about this already and the more he talks the more obvious the lie gets, but Joe Public isn’t that discerning. You can’t even look on IMDB without seeing Episode IV: A New Hope right away despite that not being the right name. They don’t list re-releases and re-iterations as separate entities. Film history is basically gone already at this stage.

Post
#1593424
Topic
If the Star Wars prequels were never made, which actor you would have imagined as the Pre-Prequels Anakin Skywalker?
Time

I would have said someone like Sam Niell would be a good fit for Sebastian Shaw in the Clone Wars. But depicting the earlier days of Obi-wan having to train Anakin is tougher, unless they started a prequel trilogy like 1986. Obi-wan would have to be someone like Jared Harris if they did it in the late 90s.

Post
#1592904
Topic
New Lucas interview 2: 'Insists Unaltered Versions Of The OT Will Never Be Released'
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

Can someone articulate how in the name of heck George Lucas can sell Lucasfilm, and then tell Disney to not release the originals, don’t they own the films and all archival material belonging to the Lucas archives?

Paid 4 billion its not his movie anymore.

Its just way too insane to contemplate.

Paying 4 billion to make a potential profit many times more? To them that’s probably worth signing a contract with any clause written in, film or art history can be buried.

Post
#1592647
Topic
New Lucas interview 2: 'Insists Unaltered Versions Of The OT Will Never Be Released'
Time

Lexa C said:

George fancies himself in the realms of Michelangelo?! 😄

Very funny for him to say this, also kind of sad. If anything George is clearly one of bean counters who would have commissioned somebody else to create a work of art. Imagine if a Pope back in history claimed that some masterpiece was all their own doing and had the right to paint over it.

Post
#1592644
Topic
George Lucas will receive Honorary Palme d’or at Cannes festival
Time

“They would say, ‘It’s all white men.'”

Who? Who would say this George, what are you talking about? About the films from 1977-1983? Is this some kind of attempt to make himself seem like some kind of benevolent genius or something? Feel free to link to a source here guys because I don’t get it. It’s like this award gave him an excuse to get his soap box out, and he just felt like making himself victim to undue criticism. Because let’s face it the backlash to things he put in the prequels has never really reared its head.

Post
#1592643
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

Something about the action in the clip they just release feels off to me. Despite the lack of cutting/editing it’s not working. Maybe it’s the lack of properly dynamic martial arts camera movement and the lack of old-school pow-powder? Maybe they’re just not trained fighters and are just acting out the motions. It’s kinda weightless for some reason.