logo Sign In

Mocata

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Feb-2017
Last activity
12-Nov-2025
Posts
2,753

Post History

Post
#1667403
Topic
What do you think of the <strong>Sequel Trilogy</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

NFBisms said:

Do you really think within a genre certain themes and topics become verboten?

Maybe not themes explicitly but how they’re presented. Otherwise a lack of tonal consistency appears or you get something like Rebel Moon. People already started saying that the serious conclusion to Andor doesn’t fit with the adventure plot of SW77. Think about it another way; does it make sense for the material to jump from Jar-Jar ‘whoops I stepped in the poopie’ jokes, to man being burned alive screaming? There has to be some overall balance, maybe not the content directly, but in the execution.

Post
#1667268
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

Fruit672 said:

Ok, lets get one thing straight, George Lucas is the Creator of Star Wars and every other property he has created; He will always have a say and the final say. If he wants something to be X, it should be like X and honestly he’s been pretty kind considering how straight up evil the “fans” have been. The “Fans” at some point start to get this ridiculous idea that they know better than the creator and should have control over what happens with his creations.

You don’t think this is an odd thing to say, on here of all places?

Post
#1667264
Topic
What do you think of the <strong>Sequel Trilogy</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

I guess it’s about a time and a place. Is the discussion of the wealthy one-percent, animal cruelty, or war profiteering appropriate for SW? Probably not. Does it lead to anything useful in a story arc? Nope. Those animals will be captured later and the arms deals with continue as if nothing happened, nobody really learns or progresses as a result (though that’s potentially a TROS issue). That being said it’s one of those things that even in a well written script (aka Andor) it doesn’t gel with the space opera genre itself.

Post
#1667075
Topic
What do you think of the <strong>Sequel Trilogy</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

Does woke mean anything these days? I use to think it was something do do with common sense being replaced by box ticking and messaging but it’s hard to say any more. Overall I still like TLJ but it’s odd if you break it down in any detail. Grifters complaining about Hollywood will say the Rose side-plot is forced but fail to say how beyond the basics of a lame non-romance. Would they be complaining less if Finn and Poe Dameron did this mission or is that too gay for them (or Disney)? Does it make sense Finn gets talked down to about how evil the First Order is when he’s witness to a massacre?

Elsewhere things like Luke being in hiding to avoid the circular nature of the conflict makes some sense. Some people say he shouldn’t be shown as an old grouch. But can the same old heroics go on forever, can these characters be simplistic and static? Which to me is the problem with Rogue One… it’s just so bland and has more fan service and CG action than personality. The sequels might not have much to say but RO is just ‘here’s Darth Vader, please clap’, and then people do.

Post
#1666379
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

Why are they still talking about it as if there’s “one rare print” lying there like the ark of the covenant and Gareth Edwards caught a glimpse before it vanished into a bottomless pit, gimme a break. Like he saw “it” rather than he saw one of many prints that are around and always have been. They didn’t even reference BFI release never mind the new leaks. Utter tabloid crap.

Post
#1665853
Topic
What do you think of the <strong>Sequel Trilogy</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

Vladius said:

Initial thoughts:
Since they would be “hunting” for Ben Solo he wouldn’t actually be in it as much as the other characters, so it might have looked like the Rey movie they’ve already worked on and cancelled (twice?)
People liked him as a villain, and people generally didn’t like the last minute romance, so it’s hard to say that the popularity of the character would be there.

I missed this supposed title somehow. Would it be like The Search for Spock LOL

Post
#1665796
Topic
George Lucas: Star Wars Creator, Unreliable Narrator &amp; Time Travelling Revisionist...
Time

Latest George soundbite on SW:

I’ve moved past it. I mean, I’ve got a life.

https://www.darkhorizons.com/george-lucas-has-moved-past-star-wars/

Which I hope is true. Maybe that’s why the leaks of new material have come along recently? Then again it could mean absolutely nothing.

Just last year of course we were hearing this stuff:

https://originaltrilogy.com/topic/New-Lucas-interview-2-Insists-Unaltered-Versions-Of-The-OT-Will-Never-Be-Released/id/118589

I think a film belongs to its creator. When Michelangelo made the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, he looked at it and said: I’m going to redo this part.

But I suppose both things could be true, he could be done with it all and still have power to veto a restored OOT release.

Post
#1665171
Topic
Lucasfilm Games
Time

I came across this artwork and remembered “Star Wars: Eclipse” was a thing. The Quantic Dream (Heavy Rain) production. Then I wondered if it’s ever going to come out.

https://x.com/qdream_ru/status/1916749239201272081

They claim it’s still in development, but say they are also making a multiplayer game. Which lately has signalled the death of dev teams since the market for such things is basically full.

https://www.eurogamer.net/star-wars-eclipse-is-still-in-development-quantic-dreams-assures-alongside-new-competitive-multiplayer-game