logo Sign In

Lust-In-Phaze

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jan-2015
Last activity
29-Oct-2025
Posts
126

Post History

Post
#1053536
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

It’s gotten to the point where I don’t particularly care anymore. Years of being burned by this hope have brought me to the conclusion that no matter what, whether there’s an official release or not, I will always have an acceptable analogue in projects like Despecialized. Of course, for many it’s more a matter of principle and preserving history, but given Disney’s track record with classic releases, I’m not going to hold my breath for very much longer. I’ll still be glued to my computer during the Celebration livestream, and I’ll still be hunting down the credibility of any rumors that speak of an OOT, but it’s with no small amount of pain that I say I don’t think it’s very likely at this time.

Post
#1052566
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Perhaps obligation isn’t the right word. To me, the fact that over the past three years or so more and more people have been talking about Despecialized and other such fan interpretations means Lucasfilm would have more incentive to say something, not because it’s owed to anybody but because this may well become a huge financial loss on their part should they not capitalize on it. Of course, the argument could be made that the average blu-ray buyer (hell, even the average Star Wars fan) isn’t clamoring for an OOT release, but if it was announced and marketed right – which I’m sure Disney wouldn’t screw up – they could definitely pique the layman’s interest in seeing “the original masterpiece” or something kitschy like that.

Post
#907770
Topic
Info Wanted: 'LOTR - FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING': Green tint removed?
Time

The Aluminum Falcon said:

Hey guys, saw MOMA’s 35mm preservation print of FOTR, and I must say, though the BD grading isn’t perfect, the DVD colors are far worse.

Rivendell especially looks nothing like it does on the big screen; it’s got a subtle cyan(!) shift to it rather the DVD’s ugly purple tones. Really, the film looked beautiful on 35mm in a way that none of the releases have done justice.

It really does look like to me that the BD was an earnest, if flawed, attempt to recreate the 35mm look in a digital realm. In short, trying to recreate the DVD colors doesn’t seem like the right path for theatrical accuracy.

Also, there was some footage for The Two Towers at the end of it, and, looking at it, the Extended BD (which keeps the established color palette from the DVD) looks flawed as well.

Where can one see the MOMA preservation? Assuming you’re talking about the Museum of Modern Art one, I have the feeling that’s not up anywhere online.

Post
#900852
Topic
Team Negative1 - Star Wars 1977 - 35mm Eastman Vs Technicolot Theatrical Version (* unfinished project *)
Time

A few more questions to satisfy my hype:

  • What is the soundtrack going to be? 35mm Stereo and mono I’d assume, but maybe the 70mm 5.1 too? Will they be directly from the reels or will it come from the '93 releases again?

  • Will this release have a message before it like the SSE did? I’m all for giving credit where it’s due so I’m just curious.