- Post
- #1669739
- Topic
- The <strong>Original Trilogy</strong> Radical Redux Ideas Thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1669739/action/topic#1669739
- Time
I had a legitimate shower thought today. Did people in 1980 hypothesize that Obi-Wan genuinely thought he was telling Luke the truth about his father? So Darth’s reveal to Luke is just as devastating to Ben as it is to Luke.
What I mean by this is, what if George Lucas had gone a different direction and revealed in Episode 6 that Darth Vader (still a separate apprentice of Obi-Wan in this continuity) had an affair with Anakin Skywalker’s wife while he was out fighting the war? Darth betrayed his friend by doing this and then killed him when he learned the truth. And Obi-Wan was never made aware that Luke’s mom did this, naturally assuming that Luke is Anakin’s son. I guess the Emperor would need to be none-the-wiser, as well.
This would have ultimately been significantly less of a retcon than what we got. The ending of the original trilogy would have ended up exactly how the sequel trilogy went, with Luke rejecting the last name of Vader and taking on the name of Skywalker in honor of Obi-Wan’s friend.
EDIT: Nevermind, I just remembered that a part of Vader’s reveal to Luke is that he refutes ever killing Luke’s father, and states that Luke doesn’t know the truth of what happened to him. So this wouldn’t have been something people thought of after seeing ESB, unless they thought Vader was lying about only that one part of the reveal. Still, this idea could have worked if it had been implemented into ESB itself to be less of a retcon.