logo Sign In

JadedSkywalker

User Group
Members
Join date
7-Jun-2020
Last activity
17-Sep-2025
Posts
1,556

Post History

Post
#1659801
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

Mocata said:

Unfortunately general audiences might not see it that way. Just look at how many of them seem annoyed that people even talk about their desire to get it released. Like, how dare we even think about messing with with George’s true artistic vision etc. They’ve been fed that idea for so long now; if respect is due it’s not to SW 1977 and the ground breaking award winning original film… it’s respect for George or nothing; especially in the Disney era where they can say his story has been “ruined”. Despite all of the content he added between 1997 and 2005 being utter crap.

I don’t know if It is general audiences, but the EU Lucas devotees and the prequel kids from youtube seem to be completely incensed by the idea of the original getting released. The fact it would be Disney and KK is seen as heresy.

For some its the Saga of Darth Vader, they see Hayden Christensen as the icon.

I don’t see Star Wars that way at all being older. Star Wars was the Adventures of Luke Skywalker and Mark Hamill, it was the Star Wars Saga. David Prowse was Darth Vader imho. It may well be just a generational divide.

Post
#1659288
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

There is a market if you live in Japan have an 8k television set and NHK television which broadcasts 8k movies like 2001 a Space Odyssey. I don’t think that is Disney’s demo.

As for my personal opinion about higher than 24fps I saw the Hobbit in 48 frames per second and it looked horrid like video. I was generally unimpressed they chose to shoot on digital for 3D over film in any case since Lord of the Rings was shot on Super 35.

Honestly anything over 4k seems like overkill for consumers anyway. You can scan higher for sure if your final output is 4K.

Post
#1659260
Topic
Denis Villeneuve says the Star Wars franchise “derailed” in 1983
Time

I liked Lynch Dune part I more than Villeneuve. There is no Lynch part II to compare part II to. I liked the second part I know people complained about the changes to Chani from the book.

I also liked the sci fi mini series all those years ago and the Children of Dune follow up.

Return of the Jedi is where the prequel rot started to set in, i still enjoy the movie but not the rough patches. And Darth is way weaker in that movie than The Empire Strikes Back and Han and Leia have pretty much nothing to do. The rescue of Han Solo makes no sense but i enjoy the movie serial silliness of it. All except the whiffle bat lightsaber that causes no damage to the aliens Luke is fighting over the pit of Carkoon. No one loses an arm or a hand or a head.

There are some impressive set pieces Jabba’s sail barge, Jabba’s palace. The Death Star II. The Ewok Village. Then you have unbelivable fake stuff like the Matte painting of the Falcon in the Rebel Hangar. Instead of a full size built Falcon.

The Redwoods provide a unique setting for the rebels to chase stormtroopers on Speeders and you believe in the action that they could crash into a tree.

The Space Battle. at the end still hasn’t been topped. I like the chorus and and the part with the lightsaber duel and Luke fighting Vader, but it has nothing on the duel at Bespin, and Vader fights like a weak and already defeated opponent. He is only winning when Luke refuses to fight. The fight is very one sided.

The version with Leia as Queen of her people and Han dead would have been poignant, but would have angered parents and disappointed children and you can’t sell dead Han toys. Leia ends up alone, Luke ends up alone. They both find their duty is separate from their circle of friends. No screenplay for this version exists, we but rely on Gary Kurtz recollection of the early idea for the third film. Han died in his attack on an imperial base. He survived Carbon Freezing just to bite it. As a kid I would have felt cheated if Han killed in such a lame way, I felt the same way in Force Awakens.

The film is an incomplete experience without Lapti Nek, Yub Yub or Sebastian Shaw as Ghost Anakin. I refuse to watch the later versions. I intensely dislike the version with Hayden at the end. I hate Jedi Rocks, and Victory Celebration sounds like an incomplete temp track piece. The Ewoks singing is much more mythological and fits with Threepio storytelling earlier in the movie. They’ve added themselves to the story by helping to fight the Empire.

Post
#1659125
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

That does not mean its intended for release even if there is a restoration. It could be just to put it back into Disney’s vault. To protect their assets.

What are the odds Lucas relented. Look how angry he got that Disney did not use his story treatments, you think he wants the original of Star Wars available.

I wonder if Disney can do it against his wishes. If they actually have a contract that prevents them from releasing them.

Post
#1659018
Topic
Gargoyles: The Movie (The Heroes Awaken) Restoration {Proposal}
Time

Where do people do these laserdisc rips and restorations, I’m not aware of such a forum. I’ve seen a few pop up on archive and be deleted. But not for Rock and Rule or Gargoyles unfortunately.

I’m quite interested especially in archiving anime laserdiscs.

The price of making and purchasing equipment to do it right is exorbitant. Domesday.

Back in the old times me and my friend were simply using a DVD recorder to dump them to a burned DVD.

The DVD recorder was his of course and I was sending the discs to be captured. A lot of the stuff did eventually get a DVD or Blu-Ray release. Some of it didn’t. Lensman is still a non available movie. That was his rip not mine of the Japanese disc and US disk on 2 DVD no subtitles.

Gall Force is never happening, much to my dismay. I lived long enough to see Bubblegum Crisis get multiple blu-ray releases, and even Project A-ko was saved from obscurity. I have the Gall Force mega laserdisc set that has a vinyl record with it, Gall Force Rhea is in non anamorphic its the best film ever looked. I’ve collected all but Genom Rally and I have the CLV reissues and the CAV initial releases of all the films and OVA except for the remake which i did not care for.

And of course Urusei Yatsura Beautiful Dreamer the 4:3 version is still stuck in a laserdisc master.

I’ve looked for Rock and Rule on Japan laserdisc its like a 4 leaf clover. I’ve never found it or not some place in some insane price.

Gargoyles the movie US laserdisc is expensive but not impossible to find. It’s gone up in price of course I passed on a slightly beat up copy when it was 70 dollars and now every copy that comes up is 90 to 100 US.

Post
#1658946
Topic
How would you handle a hard reboot of all nine episodes of Star Wars?
Time

Why doesn’t Lucasfilm create a new IP. Where is all the creativity.

George could create Star Wars, and Indiana Jones and Willow. So Lucasfilm without a young Lucas can’t create anything, is what the last ten years have told us. All they can do is recycle old worn-out IP.

Even his more wacky and ill considered ideas like making Howard the Duck was taking a risk. Something Disney Lucasfilm would never do. That was mere poor adaptation, the comic is completely different more political and less Disney.

It’s also the weird kind of comic parody and social commentary that does not work in a live action film.

Post
#1658945
Topic
<strong>Mos Eisley Cantina</strong> | A general discussion thread...
Time

I remember the deleted scenes from the behind the magic cd-rom I do remember someone captured them and put them on a DVD in times long ago.
Alternate Greedo footage, i think. Jenny. The black and white was half Kurosawa and half Flash Gordon with temp audio and some silent parts. For the Cantina.

Of course you also had the Biggs meets Luke and the Gang and Luke and the Macrobinoculars. And then the scene of Biggs telling Luke he is joining the rebellion.

Post
#1658608
Topic
What do you LIKE about the EU?
Time

I like that Zahn retconned the Lando/Mara romance and mocked it in the Thrawn duology.

I’m indifferent on him also mocking The Emperor reborn and taking a shot at Veitch. When he himself has a Clone of Thrawn in the story we never get to see.

I liked that the Callista romance went nowhere. The Akanah thing was a total waste of time. The Black Fleet trilogy was garbage.

Though I actually like 2 of the 3 Callista trilogy novels.

Post
#1658595
Topic
What do you HATE about the EU?
Time

Well there is Splinter of the Mind’s Eye where Luke and Vader first fought, and Luke had a sort of almost romance with Princess Leia. Vader even appears to have fallen in a deep pit and died and he lost an arm.

Then Lucas made the Empire Strikes Back and it’s like Splinter is elseworlds.

Lucas dropped the love triangle between Luke, Han and Leia set up in the first film. And its barely there in deleted scenes for Empire, and when Luke is in the medical center, but Leia obvious falls for Han on the way to cloud city and at Cloud city. Lucas little bandage he put on it in Jedi, making Leia the sister, and making her the other was to this day completely unbelievable to me.

You think Luke is pining for his sister, kisses his sister. Saves her from the death star and is standing at the medal ceremony smiling at her because they were platonic. Its one of Lucas dumbest moves.

Post
#1658571
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

I don’t believe in the doctrine of attachment it was made up on the prequel. It exists literally nowhere in the original trilogy or the expanded universe before episode II. In fact Luke wins because he doesn’t follow what Ben and Yoda told him, his attachment to his father turns the tide of the war bringing Anakin back to the light.

Post
#1658492
Topic
George Lucas Los Angeles Times Interview December 10, 1977
Time

No it was a compromised production at every level. He never was in control of the process. It was a virtual nightmare for him.

He would say I can see the seams, all the places where everything is held together and barely worked.

When he says it was 25% of the movie he wanted to make that is being generous, he thought it was a turkey and his career was over.

Post
#1658225
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

Wazzles said:

Considering I’ve never had a chance to see Star Wars in theaters in general, I’d undoubtedly go to this regardless of cut. Obviously I’m hoping for the OUT, but I won’t hold my breath. We went through similar speculation for the 40th anniversary with absolutely nothing to show for it.

And the 30th and only got the Rinzler book and no film.

Post
#1658215
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

I specifically avoided the Revenge reissue release because the ticket price was 20 dollars and standard laser DCP. On their smallest crap screen. At AMC. Meanwhile Sinners was on the Imax. If it was the Imax I would have paid as much as 25 dollars.

It wasn’t even in the Dolby cinema that was some other movie too.

Reminds me of when I wanted to see Dead Reckoning and both Imax screens were showing Barbie and Oppenheimer.

If this is not the original cut they can forget about it. 1981 release I probably would see just for the hell of it, but they aren’t doing that, Lucas and his vision and all that speak.

Even if I despise the title A New Hope.

To be 100% transparent the 2020 Maclunky cut from the official 4K home video release, Dead on Arrival. For me at least, although so many people will just go see it anyway. They don’t care it’s not the real deal. A lot of them like Lucas so called enhancements. And won’t mind seeing Han shoot second in 4K. or the awful Artoo behind cgi rocks. Of the three films it is the least ruined 4k release. It had a ton of DNR but not ruinous like Empire. And the Atmos mix is not bad. It’s not the actual movie, it’s a redone mix but for modern mixes it’s as tasteful as you can get.

TBH the only Star Wars I’m waiting and hoping to see is the 70mm Star Wars. Since Lucasfilm is not going to restore the oot for home viewing in any century without Lucas’s consent. He is more in tune and interested with his museum of narrative art and his charitable causes and god love him for that, but I want Star Wars. Not A New Hope.

George is never relenting, he is a known quantity. He never apologizes and he never forgives, he never comprises. And he always wins. He likes it that way, fans be damned. Unless suddenly the man has mellowed, and says give those Gen X haters of the prequels the originals. He is more likely to withhold them even more, due to his quote they throw rocks at me. They do fanedits of my movie, it’s my movie. I’m paraphrasing but he said similar things. He also said the original movie was crap because it was a laserdisc. That whopper was at Cannes.

Post
#1658206
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

I will pass if maclunky in 4K I already own that. I realize people will argue DCP are better quality than a 4K disc.

But if it’s not Star Wars 1977 I’m not going to bother. Instead I’ll watch 4k77 on May the 25th.

Or Puggo Grande or the laserdiscs. Even gout would be better than the horrible cgi version.

Its amazing that they are ignoring two anniversaries. The one in Jan for the 30th of the 1997 Special Edition, and the one on May the 25th. 50th of Star Wars 1977. May the 4th is completely made up.