darth_ender said:
emanswfan said:
So maybe Coruscant was meant to be in ROTJ:
http://www.starwars.com/watch/gwl_3d_conversation_part2.html
Thought you might find this interesting...Coruscant was called Had Abbadon.
STAR WARS – EPISODE VI : “REVENGE OF THE JEDI”
Written by GEORGE LUCAS
REVISED ROUGH DRAFT
June 12, 1981
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away…
1. SPACE
The boundless heavens serve as a backdrop for the MAIN TITLE. A ROLL-UP crawls into infinity.
The Rebellion is doomed. Spies loyal
to the Old Republic have reported
several new armored space stations
under construction by the Empire.
A desperate plan to attack the
Dreaded Imperial capitol of
Had Abbadon and destroy the Death
Stars before they are completed has
been put into effect.
Rebel commandos, led by Princess Leia,
have made their way into the very
heart of the Galactic Empire: as the
first step toward the final battle
for freedom….
Pan down to reveal the planet HAD ABBADON, capitol of the Galactic Empire. The gray planet’s surface is completely covered with cities and is shrouded in a sickly brown haze. Orbiting the polluted planet is a small, green, moon, a sparkling contrast to the foreboding sphere beyond.
If you're bring up the old idea of the St. Petersburg/Leningrad-esque renaming of Coruscant, I would say I like it; but, honestly:
1. Why change it to Had Abbadon? Not Palpsville?
2. There is no in movie explanation, thus, audience confusion.
3. Coruscant sounds cooler. Probably the reason why Lucas used it for the PT.