logo Sign In

DominicCobb

User Group
Members
Join date
16-Aug-2011
Last activity
20-Jun-2025
Posts
10,455

Post History

Post
#1089562
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

CatBus said:

I think I’ve said this before but I think it bears repeating: the word racism means different things to different people. When discussing this topic, it’s pretty normal for some white people to recoil the second the word starts to touch them personally. Because racism, to them, is overt acts, conscious choices, hateful feelings, much more personal. But to others, racism is woven into the fabric of America, much more institutional. If you were born and raised here, you’ve already got some on you. The only question is: what are you going to do about it?

When Michelle Obama said she raised her daughters in a house built by slaves, that was a much more poignant way of saying she got some on her. The more important question is what is she doing about it?

The funny thing is I haven’t even called anyone racist. All I said in that regard was essentially that some people won’t admit racism still exists.

Post
#1089557
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

The sooner people in general can accept that they may have blindspots the better. I don’t know if it’s culture or human nature or a combination of both but people (in particular white men) don’t seem to either want to admit to being part of a problem or acknowledging a problem that doesn’t affect them and that they can’t see in their daily life. Basically, people don’t like being wrong. (I can sympathize.)

The truth is, if you’re a white man (as I am), you don’t experience institutional racism/sexism. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You can either accept this fact and look outside of your own bubble for evidence as to where and how and why and to what extent, or you can retreat back and proclaim that white privilege can’t possibly exist and that anyone complaining about problems that you don’t personally experience are just making things up.

If you want to be more understanding of the world around you and more empathetic towards your fellow humans, you can seek out the information. Otherwise, you can continue about your business - it won’t affect you any, obviously, but just know that to some extent you will be part of the problem.

Do you always have to be so self-righteous? Condemning a group for being awful and that they have no problems won’t win any of their suppport, this is partly why the Clinton campaign did not do as well as it should have. Instead of saying “You’re evil” or whatever, provide examples of what is wrong, like Catbus did, and what we can do to solve it. It would be a lot less frustrating and a lot more productive.

DominicCobb said:

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

I asked for examples. Fuck off.

DominicCobb said:

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

Being belligerent isn’t exactly the most inviting behavior for a reasoned discussion.

You’re only serving to prove my thesis that white dudes retreat back to their bubbles and overreact when their views are challenged.

But you haven’t challenged anything. I asked for more and you retreated. You did nothing but show condescending behavior, which rightly pissed me off. Nothing you have said is substantial in any way other than to put yourself on a pedestal.

I have not called you out. I was not talking about you specifically or really about anyone specifically here. I was speaking generally, though this tends to be the issue. It is not hard to parse generalized statements. That’s why the phrase “not all men” is such an eye roller. Though the fact that you responded in the way you did does tell me I hit a nerve.

I have not used any of the words you claim I did. Nowhere did I call anyone “evil,” despite what your quotation marks would suggest. Nowhere did I “condemn a group for being awful.” Nowhere did I call anyone an asshole (though your behavior is testing my patience in that regard). Nowhere did I say people like you are the problem (just that you can be a part of it to an extent if you aren’t willing to listen).

This goes back to why I shut down before with Warbler and mfm. If you guys are going to twist my words and make me into some sort of self righteous justice warrior condemning all the white men in the thread for being evil, I don’t know how I can reason with you. I don’t try to be condescending but it’s hard not to when you’re acting like children. If you can’t actually interact with the actual words I’m using, then I don’t entirely believe we’re on the same level to have an intelligent discussion.

Again, I don’t want to be condescending, but please read the post I made that set you off again:

DominicCobb said:

The sooner people in general can accept that they may have blindspots the better. I don’t know if it’s culture or human nature or a combination of both but people (in particular white men) don’t seem to either want to admit to being part of a problem or acknowledging a problem that doesn’t affect them and that they can’t see in their daily life. Basically, people don’t like being wrong. (I can sympathize.)

The truth is, if you’re a white man (as I am), you don’t experience institutional racism/sexism. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You can either accept this fact and look outside of your own bubble for evidence as to where and how and why and to what extent, or you can retreat back and proclaim that white privilege can’t possibly exist and that anyone complaining about problems that you don’t personally experience are just making things up.

If you want to be more understanding of the world around you and more empathetic towards your fellow humans, you can seek out the information. Otherwise, you can continue about your business - it won’t affect you any, obviously, but just know that to some extent you will be part of the problem.

If this posts sounds patronizing then I apologize, my aim was more to be clinical. I’m not attacking you or anyone else personally, in fact right off the bat I put the blame on culture and/or human nature. People don’t like being wrong. I’m the same way. When people have their worldview challenged, they bristle and retreat. I was the same way at first. All my point ever was in that post was to say the next step is as simple as being able to listen to views that challenge your own, and investigate experiences that differ from your own. It’s so easy to find examples online. So easy. I can sit here and google and show you all of them. But that’s not going to make a difference if you’re not willing to listen (and let me be clear, your attitude thus far tells me you clearly are not). If you’re actually interested in finding examples, you can seek them out yourself. If not, feel free to go about your business, as I said.

Post
#1089536
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

The sooner people in general can accept that they may have blindspots the better. I don’t know if it’s culture or human nature or a combination of both but people (in particular white men) don’t seem to either want to admit to being part of a problem or acknowledging a problem that doesn’t affect them and that they can’t see in their daily life. Basically, people don’t like being wrong. (I can sympathize.)

The truth is, if you’re a white man (as I am), you don’t experience institutional racism/sexism. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You can either accept this fact and look outside of your own bubble for evidence as to where and how and why and to what extent, or you can retreat back and proclaim that white privilege can’t possibly exist and that anyone complaining about problems that you don’t personally experience are just making things up.

If you want to be more understanding of the world around you and more empathetic towards your fellow humans, you can seek out the information. Otherwise, you can continue about your business - it won’t affect you any, obviously, but just know that to some extent you will be part of the problem.

Do you always have to be so self-righteous? Condemning a group for being awful and that they have no problems won’t win any of their suppport, this is partly why the Clinton campaign did not do as well as it should have. Instead of saying “You’re evil” or whatever, provide examples of what is wrong, like Catbus did, and what we can do to solve it. It would be a lot less frustrating and a lot more productive.

DominicCobb said:

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

I asked for examples. Fuck off.

DominicCobb said:

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

Being belligerent isn’t exactly the most inviting behavior for a reasoned discussion.

You’re only serving to prove my thesis that white dudes retreat back to their bubbles and overreact when their views are challenged.

Post
#1089521
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

The sooner people in general can accept that they may have blindspots the better. I don’t know if it’s culture or human nature or a combination of both but people (in particular white men) don’t seem to either want to admit to being part of a problem or acknowledging a problem that doesn’t affect them and that they can’t see in their daily life. Basically, people don’t like being wrong. (I can sympathize.)

The truth is, if you’re a white man (as I am), you don’t experience institutional racism/sexism. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You can either accept this fact and look outside of your own bubble for evidence as to where and how and why and to what extent, or you can retreat back and proclaim that white privilege can’t possibly exist and that anyone complaining about problems that you don’t personally experience are just making things up.

If you want to be more understanding of the world around you and more empathetic towards your fellow humans, you can seek out the information. Otherwise, you can continue about your business - it won’t affect you any, obviously, but just know that to some extent you will be part of the problem.

Do you always have to be so self-righteous? Condemning a group for being awful and that they have no problems won’t win any of their suppport, this is partly why the Clinton campaign did not do as well as it should have. Instead of saying “You’re evil” or whatever, provide examples of what is wrong, like Catbus did, and what we can do to solve it. It would be a lot less frustrating and a lot more productive.

DominicCobb said:

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

Post
#1089501
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

The sooner people in general can accept that they may have blindspots the better. I don’t know if it’s culture or human nature or a combination of both but people (in particular white men) don’t seem to either want to admit to being part of a problem or acknowledging a problem that doesn’t affect them and that they can’t see in their daily life. Basically, people don’t like being wrong. (I can sympathize.)

The truth is, if you’re a white man (as I am), you don’t experience institutional racism/sexism. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You can either accept this fact and look outside of your own bubble for evidence as to where and how and why and to what extent, or you can retreat back and proclaim that white privilege can’t possibly exist and that anyone complaining about problems that you don’t personally experience are just making things up.

If you want to be more understanding of the world around you and more empathetic towards your fellow humans, you can seek out the information. Otherwise, you can continue about your business - it won’t affect you any, obviously, but just know that to some extent you will be part of the problem.

Post
#1089002
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

It’s funny that progressives are always called the “snowflakes.”

Trying to find understanding comes from both sides. When you whine and stomp your foot and you intentionally miss my point, you’re not pulling your weight in this conversation (and that’s what it should be - not a debate).

If you’re responding to me, I haven’t done anything. If asking for further explanation is too much then you can hardly claim any moral high ground.

Not talking to you, except just to extrapolate in what I meant.

I’m not incapable of further explanation (though I don’t have the time at the moment), but there’s no point if people are going to put their fingers in their ears.

Post
#1088994
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

You guys have unsurprisingly missed the point(s) (just like last time).’

I’m a white male, I could never possibly understand these things.

Hopefully someday you and the rest will (and you most certainly can), and the world will be a better place.

Yeah, I know, I make the world such a horrible place right now.

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

Not as much as saying that the world is held back by people like Warbler, who has most likely never in his life hindered human progress, not having the right opinions. The right opinions being your opinions of course.

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

You guys have unsurprisingly missed the point(s) (just like last time).’

I’m a white male, I could never possibly understand these things.

Hopefully someday you and the rest will (and you most certainly can), and the world will be a better place.

Yeah, I know, I make the world such a horrible place right now.

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

Post
#1088957
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

You guys have unsurprisingly missed the point(s) (just like last time).’

I’m a white male, I could never possibly understand these things.

Hopefully someday you and the rest will (and you most certainly can), and the world will be a better place.

Yeah, I know, I make the world such a horrible place right now.

This is the kind of shit that makes it impossible to reach a point of understanding.

Post
#1088904
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

DominicCobb said:

Frank your Majesty said:

Is there a reason for the changing aspect ratio? I get the idea behind it in Grand Budapest Hotel and I can see the technical reasons for it in movies with Imax scenes, but this is just a stupid Transformers movie. I saw a sign at my cinema informing viewers that the changing aspect ratio is intended by the director and not a malfunction. This should indicate how the target audience of a Transformers movie thinks about changing aspect ratios.

For reasons I won’t get into, I saw it, and I don’t for a second blame the people who thought it was a malfunction.

Basically, the film shifts ratios practically every shot, with no care given as to when and why. Some of it was shot with IMAX cameras, but that’s just one of the many formats used. Again, I’m not talking about specific scenes/sequences, I’m talking individual shots within scenes that have different aspect ratios. I’ve honestly never seen anything like it (besides in bad student films/fan edits).

Did you at least sneak in without paying for a ticket? 😉

Possibly…

Post
#1088618
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Frank your Majesty said:

Is there a reason for the changing aspect ratio? I get the idea behind it in Grand Budapest Hotel and I can see the technical reasons for it in movies with Imax scenes, but this is just a stupid Transformers movie. I saw a sign at my cinema informing viewers that the changing aspect ratio is intended by the director and not a malfunction. This should indicate how the target audience of a Transformers movie thinks about changing aspect ratios.

For reasons I won’t get into, I saw it, and I don’t for a second blame the people who thought it was a malfunction.

Basically, the film shifts ratios practically every shot, with no care given as to when and why. Some of it was shot with IMAX cameras, but that’s just one of the many formats used. Again, I’m not talking about specific scenes/sequences, I’m talking individual shots within scenes that have different aspect ratios. I’ve honestly never seen anything like it (besides in bad student films/fan edits).

Post
#1088496
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something <strong>other than originaltrilogy.com</strong>... This is the place
Time

TV’s Frink said:

DominicCobb said:

Might have been released in 94, but that wasn’t when I was born.

Well ok but how far off is that?

A year. Wikipedia tells me it was actually recorded in 1994, but wasn’t released until 1995 (and didn’t hit number one until the first week of July, 1995).

Post
#1088393
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something <strong>other than originaltrilogy.com</strong>... This is the place
Time

yhwx said:

On another note…

DuracellEnergizer said:

On this exact moment, I turn thirty years old today.

I think I have the perfect dirge for this momentous occasion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX6FbIkfyro

The number one song on the week of your birthday was…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Cw1ng75KP0

Where’d you calculate that?

http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100?archive-search__input=7%2F5%2F1987

Okay but is that US or Canada?

In other news, I guess this was the number 1 song the week I was born: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WEtxJ4-sh4

Post
#1088392
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

CatBus said:

I felt I had a pretty good idea what the question was really trying to gauge, regardless of what it actually asked. And in my case, usually when I answered “Neutral” because what the question actually asked was too vague, it effectively made me more conservative than if I had just answered what I felt the question was trying to gauge. So, if anything, I think the bad questions had a moderating effect on the results.

Yeah this is pretty much same for me.

I also generally am not a fan of being able to tell what a question is trying to gauge, I feel like that kind of defeats the purpose. I could have come up with the percentages I got easily out of thin air just based on what I think to be my feelings, rather than what my feelings actually are (which is what the questions should be figuring out)

Post
#1088378
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something <strong>other than originaltrilogy.com</strong>... This is the place
Time

yhwx said:

I don’t like how people/autocorrect make “Leia” "“Leah.”

Agreed (wrong thread though?).

On another note…

DuracellEnergizer said:

On this exact moment, I turn thirty years old today.

I think I have the perfect dirge for this momentous occasion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX6FbIkfyro

The number one song on the week of your birthday was…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Cw1ng75KP0

Where’d you calculate that?