logo Sign In

Dek Rollins

User Group
Members
Join date
6-Apr-2015
Last activity
15-Jul-2025
Posts
3,300

Post History

Post
#1063630
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

The Great Gatsby (2013) – ★★1/2

The first third of the film was pretty bad. Once the story got started, there was no sense of pacing and everything was moving too fast. It was poorly edited, and I couldn’t tell what was going on for some of it. Once it got past that first phase, the pacing started to exist, and it progressed fine.

Performances were good. I really was able to care about Nick and Gatsby because Maguire and DiCaprio did well with the roles. Though I think the entire film could’ve built interest better and I didn’t like the visual style very much, but I had to be generous with a half star above average because the actors delivered the interesting character aspects so well, especially in the final act.

I also feel that it was a good call to write the film with a narration by Nick so that the books words good be properly interjected.

It wasn’t “great,” but it had some good stuff. I didn’t find the source material terribly entertaining, so I was surprised that the actors in the film were able to gather my interest more, even when their dialogue was word for word from the novel.

Post
#1062991
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

DominicCobb said:

Dek Rollins said:

I’m pretty sure Gen Y covers everyone born from the 1980’s to 2000.

That’s pretty generous. The differences between someone born in 1980 and 2000 are vast. I’d say someone born in 2000 has a lot more in common with someone born in 2005 than 1995.

There has to be a cutoff point somewhere, and 2000 doesn’t sound too wrong. I mean, one of my brothers was born in '95, and we aren’t really in different generations.

Post
#1062985
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

DominicCobb said:

Dek Rollins said:

TV’s Frink said:

Dek Rollins said:

I’m not “angling” for anything. I typed what came into my head.

Come on, you hang out in off topic. You know what the Lurker Thread is. Think it through. Or even easier, go check out the Lurker Thread.

I never said that I didn’t know what the Luker Thread is. I know what he was referring to, and I responded accordingly. When I was typing goofy names for all the characters, I wasn’t doing it to get recognition in the Lurker Thread. I typed what came into my head because I felt like it. And yes, I know Gin Erso was posted in the Lurker Thread.

You’re missing the point that it was a joke. Whether or not you were actually “angling” for it doesn’t matter.

I guess I’m not getting a joke anywhere. You responded to my post with a remark that I was angling for the Lurker Thread. If this wasn’t meant to be taken too seriously, I guess I missed it, so I responded to you by saying that I wasn’t angling for anything, because I wasn’t. Sorry.

Post
#1062961
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Why do people keep referencing YouTube reviews? Who cares?

Must be some Millennial thing.

I mentioned agreeing with the RLM crew on most aspects of the film in my original post. I thought they did a good job discussing the film and used something Jay said in my response because it was well said. Why do people reference reviews period? That’s all they are. Did I say I think anybody cares what it is that I’m making reference to? It wasn’t a joke reference or anything, it was a well said comment that I remembered from their discussion so I mentioned it.

TV’s Frink said:

Dek Rollins said:

I’m not “angling” for anything. I typed what came into my head.

Come on, you hang out in off topic. You know what the Lurker Thread is. Think it through. Or even easier, go check out the Lurker Thread.

I never said that I didn’t know what the Luker Thread is. I know what he was referring to, and I responded accordingly. When I was typing goofy names for all the characters, I wasn’t doing it to get recognition in the Lurker Thread. I typed what came into my head because I felt like it. And yes, I know Gin Erso was posted in the Lurker Thread.

Post
#1062938
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

As I stated in my original post, I was entertained by the fanservice at various points while watching, and I liked the Forceman. There really wasn’t anything else in it that I liked whatsoever. IMO it isn’t a very well made film. It was poorly concieved, written, and executed in almost every way. As Jay Bauman said in the Half in the Bag review, the first thing it has to accomplish is getting past the element of “who cares how they stole the plans?” and I don’t think it accomplished that very well.

Post
#1062905
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

I never posted my thoughts on Rogue One after seeing it, so I’ll do that that now because I feel like it.

★★

I was entertained by the extreme amount of fanservice that most of the film was drenched in; though, I was annoyed by some of it at times, when it went too far, and after the initial state of watching the film wore off, most of it just annoyed me because it didn’t make sense. The plot and the execution of the plot in the film were not to my liking, and it sometimes also just didn’t make sense. The first third of the film was rather boring (with small stretches of boring throughout), and the characters were boring and forgetable.

Gin Erso was not even remotely interesting to me. Once getting past the opening exposition, she was just kind of there, doing whatever the plot needed her to do. She didn’t feel like a “strong female lead” character because there was no character to be found.

The Cass man was almost equally uninteresting, though he was just enough more interesting for me to actually want a little more out of him. I didn’t get any of that.

The guy who called their team “Rogue One” was probably the third most interesting character, but he was immediately forgetable because they didn’t develope him either.

The Forceman was definitely the most interesting character. Like, he was the only legitimately interesting character in the film. I thought it was great when he fought the storm troopers with his bowstaff skills. It reminded me of how I thought the Jedi should have fought in the prequels after seeing Essence of the Force.

The Forceman’s dudebro was pretty cool, though I thought it was dumb when he was pretty much just aimbotting everyone.

The cheap-humor droid was a little bit entertaining, but again, he was just cheap humor; kind of like C-3PO, only C-3PO actually had a developed character and therefore a reason and an excuse to be the silly voice of comic relief; C-3PO was also more funny because of what his character acted like, rather than just spouting sarcastic remarks for no reason everytime he was on screen.

CG Tarkin looked bad, but not as bad as I would have expected; but he shouldn’t have been CG faced anyway because the guy who played him in the film already looks so much like Peter Cushing that it would only take some makeup and maybe small prostetics to get him looking the same. And CG Leia was really bad, and showing her at all was also unnecessary.

Now, the plot/story and the execution of said plot/story.

The whole thing felt rather weak. Or should I say, weakly written and developed. I don’t like the idea that the weak point on the Death Star was built in by a sabatour. When I thought about how the rebels stole the plans, I thought that they would have found out through some sort of intelligence that it had finished construction. So, they realize that to destroy it and stop the threat, they need to find the build plans and exploit whatever they can find (as was alluded to by the smart Imperial man in the round table scene of SW).

Really, it should have just been a fun heist movie like Ocean’s Eleven. No huge battle spectacle was needed at the climax.

And the last scene… I hated it so much. The Vader massacre was almost comically over the top, and the way the plans were brought to the Tantive IV isn’t even what they said happened in SW. “Several transmitions were beamed…” is not the same as “I watched a dude pass a floppy disk through a door after one transmission was beamed to a different ship.” The Tantive IV shouldn’t have even been at the big space battle. The ship that recieved the plans should have beamed several transmitions to them in another location after temporarily escaping.

I think RLM’s videos did a great job analyzing the film, and I have to say that I agree with most of what they thought.

Post
#1062515
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

We just read The Great Gatsby in my English class. It wasn’t terribly interesting to me. There were actually some interesting aspects throughout, but overall it was just rather boring and pointless. We’ve started watching the movie (2013) in class and are probably half way through it. I’ll post my findings in the proper thread when we finish.

Post
#1060783
Topic
Last web series/tv show seen
Time

I’ve finished making it through four long seasons of Ronald D. Moore’s Battlestar Galactica. I was quite satisfied when it came to an end. Wonderful show, though I hated the cinematography every minute of it. If only they had let him make Voyager like this, but then again, he probably wouldn’t have made this if that happened.

I still wish the original was better. I like it a lot, but it can be rather shallow and downright silly a lot of the time.

Post
#1060106
Topic
Samurai Jack
Time

My only nitpicks with the series so far is that Aku’s recast is disappointing (the guy almost has a mexican accent it seems), the animation not being up to my picky standards of exact replication (and the 3D CG bike was stupid), and the fact that they addressed the previously existing TV restraints on Jack’s ability to kill people. Not to mention the fact that he actually did kill multiple non-robot people in the original run.

It’s been pretty great though, and I hope it just gets better!