https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D__6hwqjZAs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1vXvBMIUJc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKw2RCnbpe4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfmMQVyQnkY
Black Panther is a fan project? I’m impressed.
I was referring to the blanket statement that only Despecialized can be discussed here
I’m currently working on a V2 of my regrade, which will now completely remove the blanket despecialized statement that is heavily present on the Blu-ray of the thread.
You did mean to mock them. Your statement about “the fictional bible of the Jews and Christians” was very directly mocking the books as well as those who hold related religious beliefs, and there’s no way you can victim-card your way out of it.
I say again:
If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?
I’m not playing any cards. I’m not mocking just giving my opinion.
Yeah, you are. You’re playing the same passive-aggressive snide cards ImpScum used to play. You’re fooling absolutely no one.
Except I’m not. I take full responsibility for what I said, what I will not take credit for is everyone trying to get a rise out of me.
ImpScum played the victim, too.
Congratulations, you’re the forum’s new resident troll.
Nope, you are.
This is why everyone should use the Tex Murphy Thread.
Back to the standard.
and I will watch you try and fail to get a rise out of me.
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
This didn’t actually work this time, but I’m sure it does sometimes.
You did mean to mock them. Your statement about “the fictional bible of the Jews and Christians” was very directly mocking the books as well as those who hold related religious beliefs, and there’s no way you can victim-card your way out of it.
I say again:
If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?
He was talking about me and DE.
I was just stating an opinion, an unwanted one it seems, but an opinion nonetheless. and unlike the rest of you, I have refrained from making personal insults. Who is better, the person who answers a question or the person who jumps on the responder? The latter because name callers and shamers are not what one should aspire to be. I’m a secular humanist Jew and even I can see that there is no value to be found in the books of either religion when it comes to morality. The fact that you’re all up in arms over my suggestion to the poster proves to me that some people can’t play nice.
when the words used are actually descriptions of someone’s behavior rather than a juvenile insult, it isn’t simply “name calling.”
You mocked religious beliefs when the context of the thread and the conversation therein had nothing to do with religion. This is not an unwanted opinion, it is an insult being spread to anyone who is religiously a Jew or a Christian. We are not “name callers and shamers” because we called you out for being an asshole.
If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?
You’re playing the victim card and I’m not buying it.
He has a headache precisely because he wore it outside. The 60s fashion police batted him on the head, and now he’s swelling up because of how tight the cap is.
Anyone who doesn’t like Carrey’s Olaf has a stick up their arse! (am I doing it right?)
You mean Ten Little [REDACTEDS]?
I actually haven’t seen The Cable Guy, though I would like to sometime.
What have you seen of him, if you don’t mind me asking? (I’m just curious what specifically influenced your opinion of him)
^The movie itself is bad anyway.
I haven’t seen either of those.
Thanks coffee. I should’ve posted more like that, but I know he doesn’t need an explanation like that to understand why that post was a dick thing to say, so I reacted.
I suppose I’m being a bit of a hypocrite, but casually mocking religious beliefs you don’t agree with makes you sound like a self-righteous asshole.
Again with the name calling.
But this time I called myself a name.
You see, when the words used are actually descriptions of someone’s behavior rather than a juvenile insult, it isn’t simply “name calling.”
Okay, not all the acting was over the top and silly, but the first death stuck with my brain so that’s what I think of first.
I suppose I’m being a bit of a hypocrite, but casually mocking religious beliefs you don’t agree with makes you sound like a self-righteous asshole.
^The movie itself is bad anyway.
Not true at all.
The acting is over the top and silly, and, while I am sometimes a defender of adaptations not needing to be exact, this film definitely suffered from having an ending that is nothing like the book.
I was awestruck by the self-righteous assholery.
^The movie itself is bad anyway.
Does anyone have any recommendations for an intelligently written yet extremely vulgar book? I really want to read another book filled with wicked violence, repugnant sexual deviancy, and revolting situations but that still tells a fantastic story and has some fascinating message on the human condition.
The only books I can think of that have the level of violence and degradation you want are the fictional bibles of the Jews and Christians.
Wow.
To cross threads, how can I possibly explain how weird it is for Handman to assume the two places people wear baseball hats is at a baseball game and in their own house?
In the context of the 1960s. You mean to tell me if a grown man were to walk around with a baseball cap on his head in the 1960s, people would be able to take him seriously?
Yes, because I’m pretty sure people wore casual clothing occasionally, even in the 1960s.