logo Sign In

Dek Rollins

User Group
Members
Join date
6-Apr-2015
Last activity
10-Jul-2025
Posts
3,300

Post History

Post
#1193875
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

LordZerome1080 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

LordZerome1080 said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

LordZerome1080 said:

Dek Rollins said:

You did mean to mock them. Your statement about “the fictional bible of the Jews and Christians” was very directly mocking the books as well as those who hold related religious beliefs, and there’s no way you can victim-card your way out of it.

I say again:

Dek Rollins said:

If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?

I’m not playing any cards. I’m not mocking just giving my opinion.

Yeah, you are. You’re playing the same passive-aggressive snide cards ImpScum used to play. You’re fooling absolutely no one.

Except I’m not. I take full responsibility for what I said, what I will not take credit for is everyone trying to get a rise out of me.

ImpScum played the victim, too.

Congratulations, you’re the forum’s new resident troll.

Nope, you are.

Pff…

Post
#1193850
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

You did mean to mock them. Your statement about “the fictional bible of the Jews and Christians” was very directly mocking the books as well as those who hold related religious beliefs, and there’s no way you can victim-card your way out of it.

I say again:

Dek Rollins said:

If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?

Post
#1193841
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

LordZerome1080 said:

I was just stating an opinion, an unwanted one it seems, but an opinion nonetheless. and unlike the rest of you, I have refrained from making personal insults. Who is better, the person who answers a question or the person who jumps on the responder? The latter because name callers and shamers are not what one should aspire to be. I’m a secular humanist Jew and even I can see that there is no value to be found in the books of either religion when it comes to morality. The fact that you’re all up in arms over my suggestion to the poster proves to me that some people can’t play nice.

Dek Rollins said:

when the words used are actually descriptions of someone’s behavior rather than a juvenile insult, it isn’t simply “name calling.”

You mocked religious beliefs when the context of the thread and the conversation therein had nothing to do with religion. This is not an unwanted opinion, it is an insult being spread to anyone who is religiously a Jew or a Christian. We are not “name callers and shamers” because we called you out for being an asshole.

If someone on here made a blatantly racist comment, would I be a name calling shamer for calling them a racist?

You’re playing the victim card and I’m not buying it.

Post
#1193790
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

LordZerome1080 said:

Dek Rollins said:

I suppose I’m being a bit of a hypocrite, but casually mocking religious beliefs you don’t agree with makes you sound like a self-righteous asshole.

Again with the name calling.

But this time I called myself a name.

You see, when the words used are actually descriptions of someone’s behavior rather than a juvenile insult, it isn’t simply “name calling.”

Post
#1193760
Topic
What are you reading?
Time

LordZerome1080 said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Does anyone have any recommendations for an intelligently written yet extremely vulgar book? I really want to read another book filled with wicked violence, repugnant sexual deviancy, and revolting situations but that still tells a fantastic story and has some fascinating message on the human condition.

The only books I can think of that have the level of violence and degradation you want are the fictional bibles of the Jews and Christians.

Wow.

Post
#1193639
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

Handman said:

TV’s Frink said:

To cross threads, how can I possibly explain how weird it is for Handman to assume the two places people wear baseball hats is at a baseball game and in their own house?

In the context of the 1960s. You mean to tell me if a grown man were to walk around with a baseball cap on his head in the 1960s, people would be able to take him seriously?

Yes, because I’m pretty sure people wore casual clothing occasionally, even in the 1960s.