I forgot to post about that. I also saw the 50th anniversary 70mm presentation a couple weeks ago. It was wonderful. Seeing the opening on the big screen was awe inspiring. I will never be impressed by the stargate sequence again thanks to that experience. đ
But Halle Berry taught us the important lesson of electrified toads!
That line actually doesnât bother me. I mean, itâs dumb, but it doesnât annoy me. I just think Berry was horribly miscast as Storm and actually Stormâs character wasnât that great in the movies anyway.
But the Batman costume had a purpose behind itâs design. (and didnât some of the late-'80s comics have a pure black outfit?)
Bats first got an all-black costume in the comics in the '90s.
Anyway I love the batsuit because it still embodies the comicbook feel.
I can live with it, but I still prefer the gray-with-black-trunks look.
Maybe itâs because I grew up with it, but Iâve always thought the âjet-black with yellow emblem/beltâ look is super cool.
I mean heâs just so darn cool!
I think the color variance of the trunks might actually work better in illustrated form though.
But the Batman costume had a purpose behind itâs design. (and didnât some of the late-'80s comics have a pure black outfit?)
Bats first got an all-black costume in the comics in the '90s.
Anyway I love the batsuit because it still embodies the comicbook feel. The costumes (and Halle Berry) are the biggest reason I canât bring myself to rewatch X-Men and X2. I loved those movies as a kid.
But the Batman costume had a purpose behind itâs design. (and didnât some of the late-'80s comics have a pure black outfit?)
You guys are really convinced Iâm some lowly, immature twelve-year-old, arenât you?
FTFY
âAunt.â
I only use âantâ specific times like characters who are referred to that way in universe.
Definitely 12.
Someone told me tonight they donât like Godfather pt 2 because the parallel plot structure is confusing. He wishes the stories had been told more âgracefully.â I want to cry.
I didnât take much of a liking to Part II either but I loved the parallel plot structure.
They do for me so I donât know what the problem could be.
Or you knowâŚyou could recommend they switch to classic graphics when playing the SE. =P
SE Guybrush is an abomination that thankfully can be ignored with a button press.
All of the graphics in the SE are horrendous. All of the intricate detail created by the pixel art (including some very disturbing background imagery) is replaced with awful smeary digital paint crap that has zero fine detail.
I have not watched George of the Jungle in a while, but I just realized itâs a Tarzan clone. Tarzan and George are shockingly similar, and Ursula is obviously Jane.
Iâm pretty sure itâs a parody. I donât think it was trying to steel Tarzanâs thunder. At least not the movie, and Iâm sure the cartoon series from the '60s is the same story.
Lol paja telling someone their opinion on culture is pathetic.
Not to mention that Red Green being on that list is far more concerning.
Mildly amusing, but great comedy it ainât.
But great comedy it is. Not always smart comedy, but certainly well executed and very funny, and of course clever sometimes. It stayed on the air 15 years for a reason.
You wrong đ.
Lol paja telling someone their opinion on culture is pathetic.
Not to mention that Red Green being on that list is far more concerning.
Am I missing something? Smithers is entirely correct, the linked image is 200x90 and has zero visible detail.
His face flashes a greenish yellow but itâs never actually green, and the flowers donât appear over his face. I find the intensity of the colors and the placement of the objects unpleasant to look at. Putting just his face over a colored and striped background from the sequence and putting the flower bit on the back without that staircase would be a better look.
They chose red and green because the entire film revolves around red and green.
I guess different tranfers make it look different. I went and rewatched the dream sequence to make sure I didnât forget something and his face looked yellow, not grannysmith green.
The cover is just an amalgamation of everything that appears in that dream sequence, which I would argue is the most memorable scene of the film. Definitely the most surreal. However, I canât argue your personal taste.
As I said before, the use of that sequence isnât the problem. I described what I considered a better idea for portraying the imagery in a way that is pleasing to the eye. I donât find the choices they made for that cover pleasing to the eye. But, as you say, personal taste.
His face flashes a greenish yellow but itâs never actually green, and the flowers donât appear over his face. I find the intensity of the colors and the placement of the objects unpleasant to look at. Putting just his face over a colored and striped background from the sequence and putting the flower bit on the back without that staircase would be a better look.
SoâŚdisgusting?
I dunno. I donât much care for cranberries, but the taste of black licoriceâs grown on me.
You should bathe more often if that is the case. But harvest that licorice first, make some $ (or whatever you call it was j Canada)
Donât you know? We use beaver pelts as currency.
Sounds better than that terrible plastic crap. đ
Yeah but the cover doesnât look like that shot. The flowers are ugly and his face isnât straight up green in the actual shot. Also the red background isnât visually compelling without the lines in the shot.
Yes.
Jimmyâs face is great. But the use of color and the flowers and whatnot is not pleasing to the eye. Those bright colors donât even feel representative of the film at all.
The Odd Couple is perfect. đ
Itâs ugly. Thatâs whatâs wrong with it.
The broken grindhouse was released internally and then a user created a streamlined file with synced audio tracks. That fixed version which was not prepared by the group as far as I know, is what was released.
The ON has to be faded by now. The only proper color reference would be an archival three strip technicolor print.
