This user has been banned.
Why is everyone suddenly asking for links to a project that hasn’t been completed yet?
Be patient, jeez.
No, we’re saying Lucas did a shit job of plotting out the timeframe of the movie. I think we’re supposed to believe she’s already 7 or 8 months pregnant at minimum when we meet up with her and that she’s been doing a stupidly good job of hiding her belly, but that’s definitely a stretch.
But yes, ROTS does only take place over the course of a few days to a week.
It sounds like Adywan’s Revisited edits might do more to alter the movies than our OP is looking for. If that’s the case, then I second the recommendation for Hal 9000’s “Custom SE” edits.
Yep, I’ve yet to see any edit that is halfway decent that doesn’t include some of the deleted scenes. I generally don’t recommend downloading an AOTC edit at a higher res than 720p, it helps them blend a little better.
For example, Obi-Wan and Mace talking on the landing platform is the worst-looking one of the bunch, but it’s in almost every edit because it’s so necessary and so much better than the scene that replaced it in the theatrical cut.
Hal 9000’s “The Approaching Storm.”
And herein lies the problem - there are so many good edits of the prequels that there is no “general consensus” fan edit for any of the three films (3 people offering suggestions, 3 different answers). You really have to test a few out and find the one that you like best.
My take on that is that JJ and Terrio rewrote and reshot so much that the scenes that ended up getting deleted didn’t really match the rest of the film.
This. I can’t think of examples off the top of my head, but I’ve seen deleted scenes from multiple films throughout my life that were clearly deleted, rewritten, and refilmed before the rest of the movie was set in stone, menaing that deleted scene no longer can function in any version of the film since the scenes that supported it (or that it set up) were never filmed.
That’s got to be the situation for RO, Solo, and TROS - these movies were clearly so much in flux during filming that most of the scenes that were cut are so incompatible with the remaining scenes that they probably start subplots that were never finished, or include characters that no longer exist (Matt Smith, anyone?), and Disney doesn’t want to show just how much changes happened during and after filming, so they just skipped on including any deleted scenes.
I imagine we’ll see them eventually. Once having demonstrable evidence of how much tinkering was actually done can no longer negatively affect revenue in a significant way.
Maybe they just don’t agree with you about how good it looks? Why is that so hard to believe?
Well you didn’t quote the rest of my reply, giving a false impression on what I was actually saying.
I continued by asking if the playback on Google Drive causes any issues with colouring, which would contribute to causing confusion between myself and others about what issues we were actually referring to. That is what I meant was hard to believe.
After you spent multiple posts being absolutely incredulous at the idea that anyone could disagree with you in thinking the colors were perfect. But whatever, go ahead and pretend I’m misrepresenting what you’re saying. I’ll go back to avoiding this thread until the final release. It’s gotten unwieldy and impossible to follow unless you’re on it 24/7 (with multiple pages of new posts daily) and people with your “My opinions are right and if you disagree there’s something wrong with you” attitude make it not fun to do so anyway.
Yep, I was just gonna ask that too. You can probably take it wholesale from Schorman’s older theatrical reconstruction and just mux it in, assuming frame counts are the same.
If you’re talking about the DNR version, there hasn’t been an update. Only the no-DNR version has an update at the moment (which would be v1.4).
Dunno about Usenet though, someone else will have to chime in about that.
Okay, so the workprint seems to be a perfect match with the frames Skenera provided meaning that the intensity or whatever you want to call it, has not been altered either intentionally or mistakingly by Hal like I had wrongly assumed.
Because of this, I have no idea what everyone is complaining about.
Maybe they just don’t agree with you about how good it looks? Why is that so hard to believe?
Why are you so defensive over the LUT? We’re just giving feedback as we did with countless other edit ideas that have crossed through this thread.
+1000
Chill out, dude
If we’re emphasizing on Reys darker side via the sabre could we maybe consider Rey indirectly killing Leia
Haven’t watched your video, but this is how I interpreted the scene in the theater and how I still interpret it, and I still think it’s weird that nobody else seems to see it that way.
Rey definitely killed Leia by accident, you guys. That’s why she tried to run away and hide on Ahch-To.
/soapbox
I think the general consensus is that there aren’t any consumer-priced tools available yet to author a compliant UHD disc, but I haven’t seen much chatter about it at all, one way or the other, in a long time.
DM is basically the only thing they’re called on Facebook, Twitter, etc. “PM” is pretty much exclusive to old-school forums in my experience.
Another enthusiastic vote for crackly Rey saber, too!
LOL, my bad, that was an accidental press when I was trying to stop my phone scrolling.
Come to think of it, I don’t think I’ve ever done a Markdown Post like that before…first time for everything I guess
This editor uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:
Preview this post to see the results.
For more details, see this Markdown demo.
4K77/4K83 all the way for me.
I think the Mustafar sequence looks pretty seamless.
I still hate the entire thing and think it should pan down from the crawl to Kylo’s ship flying through the nebula to Exegol. 😉
You can always, oh, I dunno, create your own version exactly the way you want it to be, and make your own thread about it to discuss it there.
I promise you people will be more willing to talk to you about your ideas there than they are in Adywan’s thread about Adywan’s edit.
Also if anyone’s interested im making my own blu ray covers for my personal copy ill make. I used some international poster art, upscaled it, messed around with colours and made my own logo. Made a normal and crazy one.
Dude, these are great! What font is that for the TROS logo? I may have to steal it for the final version of my vanilla BR cover set, since I still haven’t found a “classic” TROS logo I really like.
Also, there isn’t a great reference-color 4K77 yet. No-DNR v1.4 is close, but not quite there. Once v2.0 releases you’ll have a much more accurate comparison to work from.
I never intended to steal Ady’s thread.
You kinda have, though. And telling someone to unsubscribe from someone else’s thread because you intend to keep cluttering it up is kinda shitty.
There’s like ten different ways you can download it from multiple locations, so just saying “it doesn’t work” doesn’t help us to troubleshoot with you since we don’t know what doesn’t work or from where. We need more details to help you out.
If you’re talking about the Lynch movie, only the “animated” prologue section is cropped, isn’t it? The rest is all the correct widescreen ratio - the original broadcast was cropped except for the new prologue as far as I’m aware.
