logo Sign In

BedeHistory731

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Jul-2019
Last activity
17-Aug-2025
Posts
843

Post History

Post
#1447246
Topic
Your ideal Star Wars Sequel Trilogy
Time

I’d go for setting the sequels 100 years after ROTJ. Chewie, R2, 3PO, and ghost Luke would be the only returning characters (limit Han and Leia to flashbacks). Basically turn Luke into an Avatar Roku-like character, serving as a mentor for a new cast of characters looking to end a Jedi-New Sith war. Spirit Palpatine could return, if one really wanted him back in some significant capacity.

Post
#1446337
Topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Time

A re-ranking of live-action stuff:

  1. Empire Strikes Back 1980
  2. Star Wars 1977
  3. Return of the Jedi 1983
  4. The Last Jedi
  5. The Mandalorian
  6. The Phantom Menace
  7. Solo
  8. The Force Awakens
  9. The Rise of Skywalker
  10. Revenge of the Sith
  11. Attack of the Clones
  12. Rogue One

Rogue One just struck a nerve in such a thoroughly nasty way. It’s the only movie in the series that fell victim to the Eight Deadly Words for me.

Post
#1445599
Topic
The <strong>Original Trilogy</strong> Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

DominicCobb said:

ā€œBad Fight Scene version 4,398,289ā€ good description of SC.38

Indeed. I really don’t like the idea that Kenobi vs Vader needs to be reshot. I’d rather work with what’s available to make integration more seamless.

Yeah, some of us are a bit too hard on SC. 38, myself included. It’s too jarring within the movie and arguably the series. Place it in a fan film, replace Obi-Wan with a random Jedi, and it’s much better.

Post
#1445524
Topic
The <strong>Original Trilogy</strong> Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

I still think SC. 38 looks like a trashy fanfilm and will never rival the original duel. It’s an overcorrection for the '77 duel.

Adywan had the right idea in just recutting the duel to make it seem faster-paced and better-constucted.

G&G-Fan said:

Besides, of course the fight scene is going to be filmed differently then the talking scenes.

But there are certain qualities that are consistent between fight and talking scenes. Lighting, quality of the costumes, filming lenses and other equipment, color grading, etc. No matter how hard you try, SC. 38 blends even worse with the original film than the redone ship effects from 1997.

Post
#1443534
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

Like, Adywan kept the tweaks to Vader’s voice from 2004 (designed to make him sound like he did in ESB/ROTJ). I’d prefer to have the Imperial March in Vader’s intro. Maybe have it be the only instance of the motif, to not overshadow ā€œThe Imperial Motifā€ in the one movie where it has pre-eminence.

Post
#1443017
Topic
Star Wars Headcanons
Time

I also think that’s kind of up to the Jedi’s choice. Kind of like why in Avatar, Roku appears to be really old while Aang looks considerably younger as a spirit (how Korra knows him) than he did when he died (as Tenzin saw him in the Fog of Lost Souls). Aang chose to keep his prime look, while Roku opted to appear aged. The same applies for Anakin and Obi-Wan.

Post
#1442628
Topic
If you could change one thing about every movie, what would it be?
Time

Anakin Starkiller said:

Does ā€œscrap the entire script before filmingā€ count as one thing?

Well that’s not far off from what they did. I always compare the last minute script to Jurassic Park III which actually scrapped its entire script weeks before filming and wrote a new one as they were shooting. The weirdest part is the finished film is actually really good. Shame the same can’t be said for TRoS.

A fellow JPIII defender? Welcome to the club 😁.

Post
#1440785
Topic
George Lucas's Sequel Trilogy
Time

Stardust1138 said:

BedeHistory731 said:

SparkySywer said:

Stardust1138 said:

BedeHistory731 said:

I like how the ST we got downplayed the PT (the PT being one okay movie (TPM) and two shit ones (AOTC/ROTS). The PT’s version of the force is too sci-fi for me and the proposed ST seems to double-down on that. I don’t see any Joseph Campbell in ā€œthe microbial world.ā€

Quotes from Joseph Campbell:

ā€œBetween mythology and biology there is a very close association. I think of mythology as a function of biology; it’s a production of the human imagination, which is moved by the energies of the organs of the body operating against each other. These are the same in human beings all over the world and this is the basis for the archetypology of myth. So, I’ve thought of myself as a kind of marginal scientist studying the phenomenology of the human body, you might say.ā€

"I would say that all of our sciences are the material that has to be mythologized. A mythology gives the spiritual import – what one might call rather the psychological, inward import, of the world of nature round about, as understood today. There’s no real conflict between science and religion. Religion is the recognition of the deeper dimensions that the science reveals to us. What is in conflict is the science of 2000 B.C., which is what you have in the Bible, and the science of the twentieth century A.D. You have to disengage the messages of the Bible from its science. "

ā€œWhat I’m trying to say is that the structuring of a mythology is conditioned by the science at that time. There’s no use constructing a mythology based on an archaic science. I wouldn’t know what to do with an atom, but I do recognize that when we had a Ptolemaic cosmology there was a whole interpretation of the relationship of the earth to the different planes of the universe that was mythologized. What happened to that was it was given an ethical and moral value, the stages of a ladder of the heavens represented the stages of the psyche.ā€

None of this has anything to do with Midichlorians

Heck, I’d have loved a straight retcon of Midichlorians as a symptom of larger issues within the Jedi Order. Saying they were a bullshit idea the Order adopted in their decline as a means of selection for child abduction.

No thank you. I feel that would truly be a slap in the face to all six of George’s films and The Clone Wars. Star Wars has always been about symbiotic relationships and helping people. It’s just The Phantom Menace made it central to the plot and started to explore it on a deeper more ethereal level.

A slap in the face to only three movies. The OT would be unaffected. Midichlorians were and still are stupid to me.

I like the theme of symbiosis in TPM, but Midichlorians weren’t a part of it for me. They’re a symbol of The Jedi Order’s emphasis on materialism over spirituality.

Post
#1440718
Topic
George Lucas's Sequel Trilogy
Time

SparkySywer said:

Stardust1138 said:

BedeHistory731 said:

I like how the ST we got downplayed the PT (the PT being one okay movie (TPM) and two shit ones (AOTC/ROTS). The PT’s version of the force is too sci-fi for me and the proposed ST seems to double-down on that. I don’t see any Joseph Campbell in ā€œthe microbial world.ā€

Quotes from Joseph Campbell:

ā€œBetween mythology and biology there is a very close association. I think of mythology as a function of biology; it’s a production of the human imagination, which is moved by the energies of the organs of the body operating against each other. These are the same in human beings all over the world and this is the basis for the archetypology of myth. So, I’ve thought of myself as a kind of marginal scientist studying the phenomenology of the human body, you might say.ā€

"I would say that all of our sciences are the material that has to be mythologized. A mythology gives the spiritual import – what one might call rather the psychological, inward import, of the world of nature round about, as understood today. There’s no real conflict between science and religion. Religion is the recognition of the deeper dimensions that the science reveals to us. What is in conflict is the science of 2000 B.C., which is what you have in the Bible, and the science of the twentieth century A.D. You have to disengage the messages of the Bible from its science. "

ā€œWhat I’m trying to say is that the structuring of a mythology is conditioned by the science at that time. There’s no use constructing a mythology based on an archaic science. I wouldn’t know what to do with an atom, but I do recognize that when we had a Ptolemaic cosmology there was a whole interpretation of the relationship of the earth to the different planes of the universe that was mythologized. What happened to that was it was given an ethical and moral value, the stages of a ladder of the heavens represented the stages of the psyche.ā€

None of this has anything to do with Midichlorians

Exactly. While I misspoke earlier with Campbell, I stand by my point of not wanting the microbial stuff involved in it. That just takes it too close to sci-fi and gets way too ā€œin the weedsā€ within the story. I’ll take what we got over the big microbial adventure.

Heck, I’d have loved a straight retcon of Midichlorians as a symptom of larger issues within the Jedi Order. Saying they were a bullshit idea the Order adopted in their decline as a means of selection for child abduction.

Post
#1439579
Topic
Deepfake Ideas - Index and Discussion
Time

Why has nobody thought to just redub ā€œFake Wedgeā€ instead of some complicated process? It’d be easier, look better, and you wouldn’t need any machine-learning tech to make it work. Consumer-grade microphones are probably at the right level now.

I only really support deepfakes for de-aging or for replacing obvious stunt/photo doubles. I don’t like the idea of ā€œerasingā€ actors and their performances.

Post
#1439442
Topic
Deepfake Ideas - Index and Discussion
Time

Anakin Starkiller said:

Eh, I’d rather old man Ewan. It’s a lot less footage to replace and Guinness would probably have preferred his involvement be forgotten anyway.

I’d rather neither. Ewan was cast because of his resemblance to Alec. Nobody needs to be ā€œdeepfakedā€ to sell it, since they’re playing the same character at two very different points in said character’s life.

Also, I wouldn’t mind if Alden Ehrenreich ranted on social media about deepfakes trying to ā€œeraseā€ him.

Post
#1437118
Topic
The &quot;Vader Edition&quot; Star Wars Saga - Episodes 1-6 Edits (WIP)
Time

G&G-Fan said:

TestingOutTheTest said:

Maybe I’m confusing it with mood, but Vader’s presence in ANH is something that’s more ominous. He’s often not the focus of the shot, and it creates this really great eerie effect; like how Leia backs up into him when Alderaan’s about to be destroyed. Vader inspires dread throughout ANH, but his hallway scene is all about terror. And that’s fine, that’s great, but explosive Vader shouldn’t be his opening. It should come at the end during his duel with Obi-Wan so that it feels like a major payoff to the hints that they both possess incredible power.

I guess I can see where you’re coming from. But I mean, Vader shows his power in the beginning when he literally lifts a man up with one hand, so its not like they were holding out until the end.

BedeHistory731 said:

I just hate the hallway scene. The fandom ruined it for me. If it would be feasible to cut it and not lose any plot, I would leap at the opportunity.

I adore it. One of my favorite Star Wars scenes now.

I still hate it and would rank it as the worst scene in the series. It represents everything wrong with Star Wars fans, how all they want is just mindless scenes of ā€œcool charactersā€ using lightsabers for violence.

I like my Vader far more subdued, not this videogame nonsense.