logo Sign In

BedeHistory731

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Jul-2019
Last activity
26-Apr-2024
Posts
758

Post History

Post
#1582231
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

adywan said:

That’s some truly impressive stuff! It seems like a real exercise in attrition (and immense patience) to remove the droid and it has truly paid off.

I’m so glad TN1’s efforts have produced such fantastic resources for despecializing shots. We’ve come a long way from OCPMovie’s Classic Editions mixing the ‘04 DVD releases with laserdisc recordings.

Post
#1580389
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

krlozdac said:

I like that Vader/Luke deleted scene in isolation but I think it was wisely cut out for better pacing and dramatic reveal.

That’s where I fall on the question. It really detracts from the semi-ominous reveal of Luke later in the movie and the choice to unveil his new lightsaber for a big action scene (where it makes the most impact).

I’m impressed with what I’m seeing, Ady! It’s impressive with how much you’ve been able to restore proper coloring to the movie and to see the subtle fixes implemented throughout. Do you think you’ll release a color-corrected/properly regrained master of the movie, like you did for ANH?

Post
#1579537
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

I’m loving what I’m seeing!

It’s superb that you solved the static grain issue (which sounds utterly laborious and tedious to fix) and to see the colors brought closer to the original intent. You’ve done fantastic work thus far, and it’ll be lovely to see the comparisons.

Post
#1576642
Topic
Anakin should have become Darth Vader before the last 10 minutes of Episode III
Time

G&G-Fan said:

Vader was never a character that believed he was doing the right thing. He was a power-hungry monster. In ROTJ it’s clear he knows what he’s doing is wrong.
The most ideal version would be accepting that he’s become a monster but pretends he doesn’t care.

That’s kind of where I am with Vader. It should be depressing that he accepts his fate and keeps going back to the well of the dark side despite the pain it gives him. “It is too late for me, son,” should be the key line.

Giving this “addiction” interpretation more space in the PT would be welcome, as well as in spin-off materials. You can’t really insert it into ANH and ESB for pacing reasons (even though one can read it into Vader’s actions in ESB, finding a partner in addiction). Also, it makes Obi-Wan’s attitude towards Vader in ROTJ seem even more dismissive, which makes Luke’s triumph resonate even more.

I wouldn’t say this interpretation was intended at all (correct me if I’m wrong), but it fits.

Post
#1576334
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

Jar Jar Bricks said:

If Ady has that one dude who did the younger Vader dub then I’d definitely prefer that. But the last thing I think any of us wants is an impression that immediately stands out. At the end of the day, Lucasfilm has already been doing AI Vader for Kenobi, so it’s not like this is something completely disagreeable.

That’s also the same guy who did the ANH Vader for DSG’s edit, matching the ANH-style distortion well. I’d say either him or another competent Vader impersonator would do the job well.

Post
#1572532
Topic
'Rey Skywalker' (Upcoming live action motion picture) - general discussion thread
Time

Anjohan said:

Seek to be beyond victimhood and you will find strength and wisdom, be a victim and you will find only pain.

Nobody wants to be a victim here.

It just seems to… be… targeted at… men? That’s unfortunate, especially if you look at the suicide ratio in men. They could really need to feel included as well.

Male suicide ratio is a problem created by the patriarchy due to unrealistic expectations of masculinity. Even then, it’s been completely co-opted by the right wing to suppress women and empower incels to hurt women.

If she’s targeting any men, she’s targeting the kind of men who hold power and desire power over others.

Post
#1572511
Topic
'Rey Skywalker' (Upcoming live action motion picture) - general discussion thread
Time

daveybjones999 said:

The stuff making people think you’re sexist is all this talk about the “Leftist Agenda” and calling ‘Gender equality a leftist media spewed myth” is the issue. Pretty much all of the people I see online who use this rhetoric are far right racist, sexist, homophobic, assholes who just don’t want to see women, people of color, or non straight people in main character roles. If your problem is that they’re not focused enough on telling a good story just say that and maybe don’t use sexist talking points in your comments.

This. Exactly this. Using any of the “agenda movies” or “pushing these ideas” rhetoric in your posts is a blatant red flag. This is partly how the harassment/hate movement GamerGate started and perpetuated/radicalized people.

Also, agreed about the laughable idea of a corporation or the mass media having a “leftist agenda.” A corporation having a “leftist agenda” would mean that it’s not a corporation anymore.

Post
#1572242
Topic
'Rey Skywalker' (Upcoming live action motion picture) - general discussion thread
Time

NFBisms said:

For what it’s worth, I don’t think you hate women, the anti-woke position is just silly. I think you’re being incurious, not bigoted. It’s not like me and Nev are pro-Disney

Same. I boycott Disney for their anti-union practices and attitudes. If you really wanted to piss me off, brag about crossing a picket line.

Additionally, I have an issue with “agenda” filmmaking. If said “agenda” results in the same kind of milquetoast, “safe” product that’s just meant to fill a streaming service, then what was the point? If you’re going to offer something that speaks to actual issues and addressing inequities, make it so that it doesn’t just fit into the safe brand of “pre-vis” filmmaking that has robbed so much from the industry.

If you’re going to advertise the tokenism, at least deliver some kind of earnest and genuine message. That’s why Andor succeeded where other D+ slop failed.

Post
#1572214
Topic
'Rey Skywalker' (Upcoming live action motion picture) - general discussion thread
Time

Anjohan said:

DZ-330 has said all there is to be said about the matter much better than I ever could, with harsh facts and a sharp mind.

Stating thoughtful opinions here that doesn’t match with the current cult following in America is seemingly so bad of a deal you are branded a wifebeater and anti-woman before the keys have been pushed on your keyboard, and everything is forcefully misunderstood so you can be the victim and the other the purpetrator.

It’s better than the cult following in America that gets people like me killed for “being different” and threatens to strip away our rights.

I’m thinking, all right. Thinking about the safety of my friends.

Post
#1572189
Topic
'Rey Skywalker' (Upcoming live action motion picture) - general discussion thread
Time

Dog whistles about “directors hating men” and the whole “leftist agenda” are disingenuous at best and downright dangerous at worst.

If anything, all Disney has is a capitalist agenda. Didn’t we spend most of last year learning how little a shit Disney gives about creatives when said creatives were on strike?

Anybody who is still making the points about “woke” stuff killing brands is genuinely dangerous to people’s safety.

Post
#1562560
Topic
What if The Prequels were based on the Pre-PT EU and were more &quot;OT Accurate&quot;?
Time

Vladius said:
There’s no broader discussion of Christianity and Buddhism or exactly WHY monks do what they do. It’s all judged through the lens of 21st century hyper-individualistic modern western culture where everything is about sex and doing what you want, when you want, screw everyone else.

I’d want to push back on that. This view is also heavily informed by modern rejection of religious institutions, colored by decades worth of abuse scandals and cults getting exposed (e.g., Scientology and the Unification Church). The “cult that captures children and brainwashes them” doesn’t seem so unreasonable after watching Jesus Camp or any numerous videos of indoctrinated fundamentalist children. The Jedi also acting as an added branch of government doesn’t help much, given how religious institutions have invested in candidates over the years. Hell, I’m not surprised Jedi molester stories aren’t more common within AO3 fanfics.

The intention may have been noble to show monastic life in a positive light, but the execution in the films has left things open to this more critical interpretation. I wouldn’t say it’s wrong at all, but rather just operating off of what has been presented in the media/real-world context. It’s a bit of that post-Catholic scandal/post-911 antitheism of which the internet has long enjoyed.

Of course, I go for the “Anakin is basically a school shooter” philosophy and argue that Palpatine radicalized a long-vulnerable person down the path of the dark side.

Post
#1562400
Topic
What if The Prequels were based on the Pre-PT EU and were more &quot;OT Accurate&quot;?
Time

Superweapon VII said:

BedeHistory731 said:

Vladius said:

That’s really interesting. I actually just read Dark Empire and I’m on Dark Empire 2 right now. I still question that internal logic though because the Emperor was clearly Vader’s master, and the Dark Lord of the Sith wasn’t ever subordinate to anyone else in TOTJ, other than ghosts of former Dark Lords like Marka Ragnos.

I’m trying to think of a justification for this inconsistency and I’m coming up blank.

I like to entertain the idea that Anakin joined the Sith specifically to gain the power to defeat Palpatine. But he overestimated his own abilities, confronted Palpatine half-cocked, had his ass handed to him, and was forced to join him or die.

It’s a really good idea for Anakin’s fall.

Also, as for Palpatine and Vader’s use of the Sith? I tend to think of Palpatine as somebody who used the Sith as a means to an end, while Vader fully embraced the ways of the Sith. A grifter vs a true believer, as some would say.

Post
#1562374
Topic
What if The Prequels were based on the Pre-PT EU and were more &quot;OT Accurate&quot;?
Time

Vladius said:

That’s really interesting. I actually just read Dark Empire and I’m on Dark Empire 2 right now. I still question that internal logic though because the Emperor was clearly Vader’s master, and the Dark Lord of the Sith wasn’t ever subordinate to anyone else in TOTJ, other than ghosts of former Dark Lords like Marka Ragnos.

I’m trying to think of a justification for this inconsistency and I’m coming up blank.

Post
#1562103
Topic
What if The Prequels were based on the Pre-PT EU and were more &quot;OT Accurate&quot;?
Time

Vladius said:

I do think Palpatine was intended to be a Sith, though. Once the Sith and the concept of Sith Lords existed, I’m fairly certain that Vader and Palpatine were integrated into it.

Vader was a Sith in the production of Star Wars, but the lines in the crawl and briefing scene about the Sith were cut.