logo Sign In

yhwx

User Group
Members
Join date
23-May-2016
Last activity
9-Jun-2023
Posts
6,256

Post History

Post
#1104004
Topic
Discord
Time

TV’s Frink said:

I’m not terribly familiar with Discord, the only things I know are that

  1. A lot of Star War Galaxy of Heroes guilds use it (I don’t)
  2. A lot of Nazis were recently removed from it

With that said, can anyone explain to me why you would need to use it for this place? Why can’t you just post whatever you’re talking about here?

I know a lot of gamers use Discord.

I’m not sure where I stand on the idea. It sounds like it could be a good idea, but I’m not sure how many would participate.

Post
#1103999
Topic
We need better looking unhappy face
Time

The forum doesn’t decide what the various smileys looks like. They’re actually emoji, and the vendor of your computer or phone decide what they look like. For example, the unhappy face, which is actually Unicode (a system for representing all the various symbols and characters in a myriad of languages) code point U+1F626 “Frowning Face With Open Mouth”, looks like this on an Apple platform:

whereas you see this on Windows:

There are other emoji that might fit the bill of “unhappy face” better, like the “Frowning Face” emoji. It would look somewhat like this, with variations depending on your OS and web browser:

As for the smileys not showing sometimes, that’s problem of OS and application developers for not updating their software to properly display the full Unicode character set, which includes the emoji this site uses. While Apple platforms and Android are generally good at displaying emoji properly, Windows and browsers like Google Chrome don’t always implement these things correctly, often resulting in broken or improper representation of non-English texts and emoji.

Post
#1103960
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

In slightly older news from the world of biology:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neopalpa_donaldtrumpi

Neopalpa donaldtrumpi is a moth species of the genus Neopalpa occurring in Southern California and Northern Mexico. It was described in 2017 by Canadian scientist Vazrick Nazari. He chose the name because the moth’s head cover reminded him of the hair of then President-elect Donald Trump.

Discovery

The genus Neopalpa, including the species Neopalpa neonata, was first described in 1998 by Dalibor Povolný.[2] Almost two decades later, Nazari reviewed the material, including specimens that had been collected since the first description of the genus, from the Bohart Entomology Museum. He considered that some of the specimens formed a new species. In January 2017 he published an article naming it Neopalpa donaldtrumpi for the yellowish-white color of the scales on the head, which reminded him of then President-elect Donald Trump’s hairstyle.

http://time.com/4637403/tiny-moth-donald-trump/

A new species of tiny moth has been named after Donald Trump, partly because the President-elect’s hairstyle resembles the moth’s distinctive yellow and white scales.

The minuscule creature, named Neopalpa donaldtrumpi, is the first species to bear the name of the soon-to-be president, whose inauguration is this Friday. It was discovered by Vazrick Nazari, a biologist and researcher from Ottawa, Canada.
“The new species is named in honor of Donald J. Trump,” Nazari wrote in a review of the species.

“The reason for this choice of name is to bring wider public attention to the need to continue protecting fragile habitats in the U.S. that still contain many undescribed species. The specific epithet is selected because of the resemblance of the scales… of the moth to Mr. Trump’s hairstyle.”

The micro-moth was discovered in southern California, but its habitat extends to Baja California in Mexico.

Last year a critter found in the Peruvian Amazon hit the headlines because of its striking resemblance to Trump’s hairdo. The flannel moth caterpillar (Megalopyge opercularis), was subsequently dubbed the ‘Trumpapillar’ by researchers, Life Science reports.

I wonder if Trump will be doubling down on moth immigration from Mexico. They’re taking American moths’ jobs, you know.

Oddly enough, I found out about this while looking at the front page of the French Wikipedia, even though I cannot speak French. Don’t ask me why I was looking at French Wikipedia.

Post
#1103802
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

CatBus said:

yhwx said:

http://ew.com/tv/2017/09/01/donald-trump-spelled-heal-wrong-again-in-a-tweet/

President Donald Trump was mocked on Twitter early Friday for misspelling “heal” as “heel,” the second time in two weeks Trump has made the error online.

“Texas is heeling [sic] fast thanks to all of the great men & women who have been working so hard. But still, so much to do. Will be back tomorrow!” Trump wrote at 7:50 a.m. ET on Friday, addressing Hurricane Harvey relief efforts. The tweet was later deleted.

Twitter users and media members were quick to mock the president for his mistake.

Appearing dumb to elicit an elitist response from Democrats is a pretty old Republican game. Not that Trump needs to play too hard at it, but still. Seriously, there are tons of Americans out there who get by just fine without spelling very well, and they may just be a little sensitive on that matter, and when the Democrats play “cultural partisan elite”, it hardly helps matters. That’s kinda how Bush effectively won the debate with Gore by getting demolished a little too severely. It’s verbal rope-a-dope – they expend far less effort misspeaking than their opponents do correcting them. Can you imagine what would happen if Democrats insisted Republicans get the name of their party right every single time they said it wrong? That’s exactly why Republican politicians and operatives still almost universally get it so consistently wrong after so many decades. It’s a messaging mandate from the party. The focus on style rather than substance aids their cause. The fact that they sound stupid isn’t politically relevant – it’s even a net positive.

That’s great and all, but I was just pointing out Trumpy’s ineptitude.

Post
#1103688
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

http://ew.com/tv/2017/09/01/donald-trump-spelled-heal-wrong-again-in-a-tweet/

President Donald Trump was mocked on Twitter early Friday for misspelling “heal” as “heel,” the second time in two weeks Trump has made the error online.

“Texas is heeling [sic] fast thanks to all of the great men & women who have been working so hard. But still, so much to do. Will be back tomorrow!” Trump wrote at 7:50 a.m. ET on Friday, addressing Hurricane Harvey relief efforts. The tweet was later deleted.

Twitter users and media members were quick to mock the president for his mistake.

Post
#1103303
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

What a world, where this has to be fact checked.

http://www.snopes.com/barack-obama-katrina/

CLAIM
Barack Obama was president when Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005.

RATING
FALSE

ORIGIN
As damage from Hurricane Harvey continued to grow in Texas in late August 2017, some Twitter users sought to defend President Donald Trump’s response to the disaster by criticizing his predecessor, Barack Obama:

The argument that Obama did not do enough after Hurricane Katrina lashed New Orleans, however, ignores the fact that Obama was not president at the time. Katrina made landfall in August 2005, during George W. Bush’s presidency.

Post
#1103272
Topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Time

LuckyGungan2001 said:

I just realised that I haven’t updated my list for a while (my opinion changes a lot), so I’ll do that now.

  1. The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
  2. A New Hope (1977)
  3. The Force Awakens (2015)
  4. Revenge of the Sith (2005)
  5. Attack of the Clones (2002)
  6. Return of the Jedi (1983)
  7. Rogue One (2016)
  8. The Phantom Menace (1999)
  9. The Clone Wars (2008)

Yeah, I’ll get some flak for four and five, but honestly, I’ve kinda lost all my hate for those ones. I enjoy 'em.

I’d give you flak for number seven.

Post
#1103248
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4

I don’t post this because I agree with it. I post it show that maybe, just maybe the cause of secession was bit more complicated than we think, just maybe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPOnL-PZeCc

I don’t think your argument really make sense.

It wasn’t may argument. I made clear I wasn’t agreeing with the video.

You keep on saying that “maybe the Civil War wasn’t about slavery,”

no that is not what I have been saying, I have being that maybe it wasn’t JUST about slavery.

OK. You caught me there.

(which sounds a hell of a lot like a conspiracy theory) but never have the courage of your convictions to follow that theory through.

I don’t have any conspiracy theory. Maybe the Civil War only about slavery. Maybe there were other reasons. I don’t know. At this point I am simply asking questions.

Here’s the answer to your questions: The Civil War was about slavery. Period.

All of the other explanations for the Civil War make no sense.

Here is one thing that doesn’t make sense to me. Everyone says the south fought the war to preserve slavery. Yet seems to clear that the push in the North to end slavery really didn’t begin until the middle of the war. I have been told in this thread that the North wasn’t fighting to free the slaves, but preserve the union. To quote Lincoln:

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that

So here is the thing. If the North didn’t care all the much early in the war about freeing the slaves, and slavery is all the south was fighting for, Why couldn’t they make agreement? The south returns to the union and slavery will be preserved.
Sounds like it would have made both sides happy and prevented war, right? So why didn’t this happen?

No.

First of all, a compromise had already been reached a decade earlier. It didn’t really make anybody happy. In fact, it’s divisiveness made the country more prone to war. Not a great solution.

Second of all, I actually think that Lincoln and Co. might have been hiding their real internal opinions on slavery when talking about the possibility of war to appeal to a broader section of the population. I have no evidence on this. This is just a hypothesis that I think might be true.

States’ rights? A state’s right to what, Mr. Warbler?

I agree one of the major things they wanted was a state’s right to decide the slavery issue for themselves.

Economic differences? Economic differences because of what?

Slavery, yes I know.

Thank you.

The bell has rung. You are dismissed.

Post
#1103221
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4

I don’t post this because I agree with it. I post it show that maybe, just maybe the cause of secession was bit more complicated than we think, just maybe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPOnL-PZeCc

I don’t think your argument really make sense. You keep on saying that “maybe the Civil War wasn’t about slavery,” (which sounds a hell of a lot like a conspiracy theory) but never have the courage of your convictions to follow that theory through.

All of the other explanations for the Civil War make no sense.

States’ rights? A state’s right to what, Mr. Warbler?

Economic differences? Economic differences because of what?