AntcuFaalb said:
Molly said:
>mfw
I thought even 16mm didn't resolve well at 1080.
16mm stock is typically shitty. It's often much worse than the stock Derann used for their Super8 prints.
Puggo's 16mm transfers, as much as I love them, are not at all representative of what you can get from a good 16mm print, or even a good Super8 one.
Also, FWIW, it's not Puggo's fault. The problems are inherent to his sources.
FWIW, I have 16mm prints of Snow White (Fuji stock, post '84), Sleeping Beauty (LPP), Dumbo (unknown low-fade stock), Fantasia (awful pink-Eastman, with heavily censored Pastoral), Cinderella (unknown low-fade stock), Robin Hood (Kodak SP), Winnie the Pooh and the Blustery Day (Mylar low-fade), Winnie the Pooh and a Day for Eeyore (Kodak SP), and Winnie the Pooh and Tigger Too (Mylar low-fade).
I'd be happy to lend any of my prints to poita, if anybody felt that these were worth preserving. I don't know what the generations are, though - if they are reductions or originals. Do you suppose that would be evident if I scanned them on an Epson v700 flatbed? That way, people could see edge codes and/or reduction markings?